thinking of geting a 2003 wrx sti ppp
#1
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: halesowen
Posts: 216
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
thinking of geting a 2003 wrx sti ppp
well at the moment i have a Toyota celica GT4 1995 as much as i love the car its getting on in age now, but as i love the 4WD and the power im thinking of getting a wrx sti ppp 2003 model was looking at evo's but seem to be to much work and cost more £££ to run and have always loved the impreza since i was younger so what am i looking out for when buying one, good and bad stuff thanks for any help
#2
Good choice!
Bought my 03sti new in sept 2003 and it's been the best car I've ever had. Only issue was knocking rear suspension struts replaced Twice under warrantee and now fitted BC coilovers.
Try and find a clean one with no silly mods like atmos dump valves, bleed valves, intake kits. Just like mine infact
dipster
Bought my 03sti new in sept 2003 and it's been the best car I've ever had. Only issue was knocking rear suspension struts replaced Twice under warrantee and now fitted BC coilovers.
Try and find a clean one with no silly mods like atmos dump valves, bleed valves, intake kits. Just like mine infact
dipster
#3
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: 1600cc's of twin scroll fun :)
Posts: 25,565
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
What is your budget? depending on what that is will depend on what you can buy, sometimes its best to see what is in your price range as the models are slightly different (JDM STI etc are very different to the UK cars and all STI's were revised for the MY05 model year).
Tony
Tony
#5
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Swadlincote
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Best car i have ever had just love it , even better after its first map ppp is good but u will do well to have a good map and fuel pump done
Enjoy here is mine
Now has black wheels and tein coilovers
#6
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (24)
i got one a couple of weeks ago moving on from a classic and have to say i love it
completely different from the one i had before due to the fact it's so much newer
mine is more or less standard apart from a td05 18g turbo and the centre cat removed, of course with a remap
one thing i will say is though the new age is so so slow compared with the classic
completely different from the one i had before due to the fact it's so much newer
mine is more or less standard apart from a td05 18g turbo and the centre cat removed, of course with a remap
one thing i will say is though the new age is so so slow compared with the classic
Trending Topics
#9
A ppp'd 300hp car already has a sports cat, decat center pipe and higher flow fuel pump, remap this for £500odd and get 330hp easy.
A non ppp'd car you would need to buy all of the above bits then remap.
dipster
A non ppp'd car you would need to buy all of the above bits then remap.
dipster
#10
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: 1600cc's of twin scroll fun :)
Posts: 25,565
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
10k drops you into MY05 money, its a better car, has the Spec C geometry setup and A-DCCD (both improve the handling).
http://www.pistonheads.co.uk/sales/1725428.htm
Not overkeen on dodgy dump valves but...
http://www.pistonheads.co.uk/sales/1764003.htm
Avoid things like this>>>
http://www.pistonheads.co.uk/sales/1824955.htm
Decatting and not remapping one of these is a recipe for disaster (mainly engine failure due to det and boost spikes)
http://www.pistonheads.co.uk/sales/1866948.htm
A few to look at plus the MY05 cars (look for the flair on the rear arches) has the uprated interior and steering wheel
JDM ones are better though
Tony
http://www.pistonheads.co.uk/sales/1725428.htm
Not overkeen on dodgy dump valves but...
http://www.pistonheads.co.uk/sales/1764003.htm
Avoid things like this>>>
http://www.pistonheads.co.uk/sales/1824955.htm
Decatting and not remapping one of these is a recipe for disaster (mainly engine failure due to det and boost spikes)
http://www.pistonheads.co.uk/sales/1866948.htm
A few to look at plus the MY05 cars (look for the flair on the rear arches) has the uprated interior and steering wheel
JDM ones are better though
Tony
#11
tingtong is it actually noticible the power difference between a newage an classic even with the 18g? if classic an newage had same power/torque would there be a clear difference in straight line performance? ive been thinking of a 03> blobeye but id have to fit an md series turbo
#14
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: 1600cc's of twin scroll fun :)
Posts: 25,565
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
But has shorter gearing (most of the time ) plus pushes more torque and has a better cd value (and wont blow up or put a piston through the block at 350bhp )
The extra weight is all in the parts people complained about with the classics, so better gearbox, uprated clutch, uprated brakes, stiffer shell (better handling), and the performance difference isnt as much as people make it out to be a new age JDM STI twin scroll for example is as quick as a classic JDM STI, if not slightly quicker (and thats not the spec c im talking about either )
Tony
The extra weight is all in the parts people complained about with the classics, so better gearbox, uprated clutch, uprated brakes, stiffer shell (better handling), and the performance difference isnt as much as people make it out to be a new age JDM STI twin scroll for example is as quick as a classic JDM STI, if not slightly quicker (and thats not the spec c im talking about either )
Tony
#16
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (24)
tingtong is it actually noticible the power difference between a newage an classic even with the 18g? if classic an newage had same power/torque would there be a clear difference in straight line performance? ive been thinking of a 03> blobeye but id have to fit an md series turbo
yes massive difference in feeling but it's not really a like for like comparrison
as said above the wieght difference is a major factor and i will always be a classic fan
the newage suits my needs much better at this moment in time, ok you don't get the same connected feeling when your driving but it's a lot sturdier to drive, suits family life (with car sick child), more comfortable on the motorway etc
i hindsight my classic was running quite a way over 400bhp (with a uk 6 speed + a 2.1) so i don't know on a like for like basis, once i have had my sc46 fitted and a 3" exhaust plus remap i will have a better idea
Last edited by TingTongPJ; 01 August 2010 at 10:40 AM.
#18
Owner of SNet
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Berkshire
Posts: 11,513
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This is the question I answered though Tony
"is it actually noticible the power difference between a newage an classic even with the 18g? if classic an newage had same power/torque would there be a clear difference in straight line performance"
I'd rather own a hawkeye of course (best looking scoobs to date IMHO) but they need serious power over a classic to be faster ...
TX.
"is it actually noticible the power difference between a newage an classic even with the 18g? if classic an newage had same power/torque would there be a clear difference in straight line performance"
I'd rather own a hawkeye of course (best looking scoobs to date IMHO) but they need serious power over a classic to be faster ...
TX.
But has shorter gearing (most of the time ) plus pushes more torque and has a better cd value (and wont blow up or put a piston through the block at 350bhp )
The extra weight is all in the parts people complained about with the classics, so better gearbox, uprated clutch, uprated brakes, stiffer shell (better handling), and the performance difference isnt as much as people make it out to be a new age JDM STI twin scroll for example is as quick as a classic JDM STI, if not slightly quicker (and thats not the spec c im talking about either )
Tony
The extra weight is all in the parts people complained about with the classics, so better gearbox, uprated clutch, uprated brakes, stiffer shell (better handling), and the performance difference isnt as much as people make it out to be a new age JDM STI twin scroll for example is as quick as a classic JDM STI, if not slightly quicker (and thats not the spec c im talking about either )
Tony
#19
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: 1600cc's of twin scroll fun :)
Posts: 25,565
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
They dont thats the main point, they are smoother and more planted, that on its own makes them feel slower, where as they are actually not, its all about power delivery, the new age cars do that far better and more linear than the classics did, I had a P1 (slightly modded) go up against my old spec c, mine had a panel filter, he wasnt as quick yet my car was heavier but I had more torque and more aerodynamic, so the point is, what is quicker? something that "feels" quicker, or something that is quicker but doesnt feel it
I could give you the autobahn story, where I had my classic up at 150+mph, and it was scary, in the Spec C on another autobahn, I looked down at the speedo and was doing 155mph and went "ooops, didnt think I was going that quickly", as you didnt notice it (felt like 80mph!)
Tony
I could give you the autobahn story, where I had my classic up at 150+mph, and it was scary, in the Spec C on another autobahn, I looked down at the speedo and was doing 155mph and went "ooops, didnt think I was going that quickly", as you didnt notice it (felt like 80mph!)
Tony
Last edited by TonyBurns; 01 August 2010 at 11:05 AM.
#21
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: 1600cc's of twin scroll fun :)
Posts: 25,565
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Depends on the parts
If you buy pads and discs from a dealer for instance, its like 550 quid (front), buy them from elsewhere and its less than 300 quid (350ish for uprated 2 part discs), cambelts are quite expensive but they are also quite long, you wont save much for a decent quality one (Gates/Subaru), then tyres are down to what you like, decent ones will cost you around 85-125 quid a corner, but these are not the cheapest cars to run, just be aware of that (fuel mainly as they require 97+ ron standard).
Tony
If you buy pads and discs from a dealer for instance, its like 550 quid (front), buy them from elsewhere and its less than 300 quid (350ish for uprated 2 part discs), cambelts are quite expensive but they are also quite long, you wont save much for a decent quality one (Gates/Subaru), then tyres are down to what you like, decent ones will cost you around 85-125 quid a corner, but these are not the cheapest cars to run, just be aware of that (fuel mainly as they require 97+ ron standard).
Tony
#22
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: halesowen
Posts: 216
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Depends on the parts
If you buy pads and discs from a dealer for instance, its like 550 quid (front), buy them from elsewhere and its less than 300 quid (350ish for uprated 2 part discs), cambelts are quite expensive but they are also quite long, you wont save much for a decent quality one (Gates/Subaru), then tyres are down to what you like, decent ones will cost you around 85-125 quid a corner, but these are not the cheapest cars to run, just be aware of that (fuel mainly as they require 97+ ron standard).
Tony
If you buy pads and discs from a dealer for instance, its like 550 quid (front), buy them from elsewhere and its less than 300 quid (350ish for uprated 2 part discs), cambelts are quite expensive but they are also quite long, you wont save much for a decent quality one (Gates/Subaru), then tyres are down to what you like, decent ones will cost you around 85-125 quid a corner, but these are not the cheapest cars to run, just be aware of that (fuel mainly as they require 97+ ron standard).
Tony
#23
Owner of SNet
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Berkshire
Posts: 11,513
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Er ... a 460hp hawkeye was 2.5s slower to 130 than me at Marham earlier this year
TX.
TX.
They dont thats the main point, they are smoother and more planted, that on its own makes them feel slower, where as they are actually not, its all about power delivery, the new age cars do that far better and more linear than the classics did, I had a P1 (slightly modded) go up against my old spec c, mine had a panel filter, he wasnt as quick yet my car was heavier but I had more torque and more aerodynamic, so the point is, what is quicker? something that "feels" quicker, or something that is quicker but doesnt feel it
#27
Scooby Regular
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Shropshire
Posts: 301
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
As above mate (things to avoid)
Dump valve (annoying)
aftermarket air intake (most increase intake temps on these models)
these and any other engine mods without a remap after they might not necassarily damage the engine in the short term but they will not help the life span of the engine or the performance.
cat back exhuasts are ok but i dont think they actually offer much of a performance improvement.
and the old knocking rear suspension.
Its also worth checking the cambelt has been changed with a receipt, most of these are carried out within the recommended mileages due to the extra strain and the low miles these cars normally do.
Incidentally there is a really nice one in the for sale section with 6 months tax and mot and the rear suspension was changed in september 2008
Whatever you choose i am sure you will be well chuffed with it, the cars are not as raw as the classics but as stated above that doesnt mean they are not going just as fast, just much smoother at speed in my opinion.
Good luck with the search
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
KOEScoob
ScoobyNet General
6
17 September 2015 03:51 PM