Loathed its base, non-turbo 2.5-liter boxer engine
30 January 2010, 10:44 AM
#1
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 299
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Loathed its base, non-turbo 2.5-liter boxer engine
If the tester dislikes the 2.5 that much, he is lucky not to be annoyed by the 2.0 liter engine that is built into the Legacy:
Subaru's reinvented Outback and Legacy tackle the terrain | SummitDaily.com
And do you get a better fuelconsumption in the 2.0 liter Legacy Touringwagon then the 2.5 liter Outback?
A test in a Dutch magazine with the two cars resulted in the same figures.
And not even that much better then my 2.5 Forester did (with speeds up to 230 km/h).
Time to replace these engines with softturbos like the 2.5 XT had.
The way it is now Subaru is falling behind the competition.
Greetings,
SRX!
Subaru's reinvented Outback and Legacy tackle the terrain | SummitDaily.com
And do you get a better fuelconsumption in the 2.0 liter Legacy Touringwagon then the 2.5 liter Outback?
A test in a Dutch magazine with the two cars resulted in the same figures.
And not even that much better then my 2.5 Forester did (with speeds up to 230 km/h).
Time to replace these engines with softturbos like the 2.5 XT had.
The way it is now Subaru is falling behind the competition.
Greetings,
SRX!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
28
28 December 2015 11:07 PM
Sam Witwicky
Engine Management and ECU Remapping
17
13 November 2015 10:49 AM
Brzoza
Engine Management and ECU Remapping
1
02 October 2015 05:26 PM
