Road Tax Query 2001 JDM STi Bugeye registered 18/03/08
#1
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (21)
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: North West
Posts: 1,236
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Road Tax Query 2001 JDM STi Bugeye registered 18/03/08
Can anyone tell me what tax bracket and how much i can expect to pay for a V7 STi built and down on the log book as 1/1/2001 but imported this year 18/03/2008
Many thanks
Many thanks
#5
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: May 2006
Location: On MLR
Posts: 1,280
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Even worse, new cars registered in 2010 in band G will pay 950 pounds first year followed by 455 pounds.
Road tax - Parker's
Road tax - Parker's
#6
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (21)
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: North West
Posts: 1,236
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks for the info Id better not buy it then, So looks like a late classic is the way forward. Im assuming its the year / date of import that effects these vehicles even if they are manufacturered pre the March 2001 threshold?
#7
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: May 2006
Location: On MLR
Posts: 1,280
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Pre 1997 classics don't have a SVA emissons test so the goverment can't place them in any tax band without knowing there emissions output. So as things stand the road tax is 185 rising to 200 pounds in 2010. I'm sticking with my classic for sure.
Trending Topics
#8
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (21)
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: North West
Posts: 1,236
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Last question, so any pre 1997 classics fresh imported will be in the lower band, What about UK classics or early Bugs? i assume the lower rate then if they are registered pre march 2001?
#10
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: www.dsoc.co.nr
Posts: 979
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm sure I've heard it something like the 21st of March 2001 or so. I saw it on another thread where two identical bugs would pay different tax because they were registered either side of this date. I'm sure I will be corrected if wrong!! Or given dodgy info in other thread!
#11
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (21)
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: North West
Posts: 1,236
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
By the word "registered" on an import am i correct to say it will be the date its first UK registered as noted on the Log Book and not the year of manufacture, as the car im looking at is first "registered" as 18/03/08
Last edited by KK3960; 30 July 2008 at 12:16 PM.
#12
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: 1600cc's of twin scroll fun :)
Posts: 25,565
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
JDM's registered in the UK before 01/03/06 wont have a CO2 band on, so you will have the 200 quid tax bracket for them, anything after unfortunately falls into the somewhat more expensive bracket.
Keep looking around, you may find a nice MY01/02 JDM STi wagon up for sale which meets this category
Tony
Keep looking around, you may find a nice MY01/02 JDM STi wagon up for sale which meets this category
Tony
#14
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: www.dsoc.co.nr
Posts: 979
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Maybe registered is the wrong word to use. I was looking at the fact his V5 date was 01/01/2001 which falls before the March 2001 cut-off point. I would imagine the SVA had it as a 2001 model and just wrote it down as the earliest date possible (loophole?) I'm not sure of all the facts in this new tax class system as I've got a classic! Just from bits and pieces I pick up of different threads.
#16
Owner of SNet
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Berkshire
Posts: 11,513
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I checked this with the DVLA & it's a right scam The relevant date is registered in the UK rather than first registered wherever. So, my car was regd in Japan in Dec 2004 & then the UK in Jan 2007. Guess which band my cars falls in to?
TX.
TX.
Maybe registered is the wrong word to use. I was looking at the fact his V5 date was 01/01/2001 which falls before the March 2001 cut-off point. I would imagine the SVA had it as a 2001 model and just wrote it down as the earliest date possible (loophole?) I'm not sure of all the facts in this new tax class system as I've got a classic! Just from bits and pieces I pick up of different threads.
#17
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Southampton(ish)
Posts: 494
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
JDM's registered in the UK before 01/03/06 wont have a CO2 band on, so you will have the 200 quid tax bracket for them, anything after unfortunately falls into the somewhat more expensive bracket.
Keep looking around, you may find a nice MY01/02 JDM STi wagon up for sale which meets this category
Tony
Keep looking around, you may find a nice MY01/02 JDM STi wagon up for sale which meets this category
Tony
#18
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Sheffield; Rome of the North
Posts: 17,582
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Im not doubting what you have been told, but they are incorrect. Unfortunately as this gathers pace itll become harder and harder to stop.
#19
18 June 1815 - Waterloo
iTrader: (31)
It's happened to me already, had a reminder for the 04 Legacy, reg'd here in June 07 VED £400 for renewal.
Luckily I have sold the car already, but it's still going to be £400 for the 04 STi Foggy I now have on renewal.
The Foggy was reg'd in the UK before 01/03/06 and also has the CO2 on it.
Last edited by The Trooper 1815; 31 July 2008 at 08:40 AM.
#20
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: 1600cc's of twin scroll fun :)
Posts: 25,565
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Well Gussy for one pays less than 200 quid per year, his car was new in the uk in 2006 (reg 1/1/06)
Its not the original date of manufacture or first registered outside the uk, its to do with the first date of registration in the uk.
Tony
Its not the original date of manufacture or first registered outside the uk, its to do with the first date of registration in the uk.
Tony
#21
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Sheffield; Rome of the North
Posts: 17,582
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Blue Dragoon
No there not!
A situation has now arisen where vehicles may be 'first registered' ten, or even twenty years after they were manufactured, because they were used first in a foreign country. These vehicles are obviously beyond the scope of the legislation and due to their not ever having been type approved, there isnt any emissions date available (this has to be from a new vehicle; you cant test used vehicles). Obviously, without type approval emissions date, it isnt possible to state what a vehicles CO2 emissions are (the tests conducted for SVA testing and E-SVA testing and the original comparison reports arent good enough althought the E-IV tests are different).
In this circumstance it is plainly incorrect (and beyond the intention of the poorly worded legislation) to attempt to force the vehicles owners to pay a higher rate of VED. Unfortunately it has become more common for VRO clerks to interpret the legislation in this manner, ignoring the fact that the correct tests have not taken place.
Now, I think that its apparent I know what I am talking about: what makes you feel that I am wrong? Just because its happening doesnt mean that it should.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
JonMc
Subaru Parts
22
06 February 2016 09:50 PM