Questions on standard WRX power/performance.
#4
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
For the OP here's a link to the official brochure
http://www.subaru-impreza.org/downlo...eza%202002.pdf
Last edited by myblackwrx; 29 October 2007 at 09:26 AM.
#7
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Portsmouth
Posts: 403
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hi
With reference to the wrx uk standard power appears to be 218 bhp i was looking at the 0-60 time of 5.9 so does that mean my 1996 wrx import which is lighter than a bug eye by about 140 kg and with 265 bhp do mid to low 5's then??
steve
With reference to the wrx uk standard power appears to be 218 bhp i was looking at the 0-60 time of 5.9 so does that mean my 1996 wrx import which is lighter than a bug eye by about 140 kg and with 265 bhp do mid to low 5's then??
steve
Trending Topics
#13
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: cheltenham
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
no it's not, 240ps is standard power for 93wrx.
For the OP here's a link to the official brochure
http://www.subaru-impreza.org/downlo...eza%202002.pdf
For the OP here's a link to the official brochure
http://www.subaru-impreza.org/downlo...eza%202002.pdf
Last edited by scoobie_girl; 29 October 2007 at 10:02 AM.
#14
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
1 bar isn't standard on an early wrx i thank you
Boost Targets & Fuel-Cut Limits
WRX/STi Saloon ECU's 2C, U8, W6, W9 - As above, 11.47psi held to redline. Fuel-cut 14.57psi
WRX (1995/96) ECU Z4 - 12.71psi, dropping to 11.78psi @ 6600rpm. Fuel-cut 15.65psi.
In bar 0.79 bar held to redline fuel cut 1bar (2c,u8,w6,w9)
In bar 0.87bar down to 0.81 fuel cut 1.07bar (z4)
Boost Targets & Fuel-Cut Limits
WRX/STi Saloon ECU's 2C, U8, W6, W9 - As above, 11.47psi held to redline. Fuel-cut 14.57psi
WRX (1995/96) ECU Z4 - 12.71psi, dropping to 11.78psi @ 6600rpm. Fuel-cut 15.65psi.
In bar 0.79 bar held to redline fuel cut 1bar (2c,u8,w6,w9)
In bar 0.87bar down to 0.81 fuel cut 1.07bar (z4)
#16
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Central Scotland
Posts: 3,687
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Either it isn't as standard as you think (in which case you could be in trouble insurance wise since your car should not be making that much power - especially as performance will drop away over time and really, you'd be lucky to find a 15 year old car still capable of putting out factory power levels) or someone's rolling road is a little bit optimistic
5t.
(03 WRX decat, zorst, Andy F remap = 273 bhp and 1.3 bar boost @ 2700 rpm)
#17
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: cheltenham
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
put the gloves away every one lol....insurance wise every thin on my car is declaired i aint that stupid...the power from my car is correct i had 3 power runs done that day....the car was completly standered when it was imported as i had it checked over to make sure...cant see how the rolling roads would be out at powerstation...im not gona quibble i no what my cars doin and im happy with it ...
#18
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
put the gloves away every one lol....insurance wise every thin on my car is declaired i aint that stupid...the power from my car is correct i had 3 power runs done that day....the car was completly standered when it was imported as i had it checked over to make sure...cant see how the rolling roads would be out at powerstation...im not gona quibble i no what my cars doin and im happy with it ...
I'm not having a go as you're just repeating what you've been told.
Did they look inside the ecu ,as i said 1 bar isn't standard.
But as you say you're happy with it and that's all that matters
#19
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Central Scotland
Posts: 3,687
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Same here - not having a go at all! You said car was standard but it is running power and boost figures that say otherwise - could have been tricky for insurance if it is checked over, just showing concern! - although you also say everything on the car is declared so i guess those are cosmetic mods if the power is standard?
And yes, different rollers will give big variances in power, that's just how it is although if you are happy then there you go.
5t.
And yes, different rollers will give big variances in power, that's just how it is although if you are happy then there you go.
5t.
#21
Scooby Senior
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: West Yorks.
Posts: 4,130
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I drive the same car as the original poster, and the standard power is 215bhp, not sure about the 0-60 time. I had the PPP kit fitted to mine which takes power to 261bhp, and a 0-60 time of 4.8 seconds, if you're prepared to be mechanically un-sympathetic to the clutch.
#22
18 June 1815 - Waterloo
iTrader: (31)
Wrong
Subaru Impreza WRX - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Subaru Impreza WRX STI - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Subaru Impreza WRX - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Subaru Impreza WRX STI - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Last edited by The Trooper 1815; 29 October 2007 at 12:28 PM.
#23
BANNED
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Your home is worthless.You can't afford to run your car.Your job is on the line.Schadenfreude rules.
Posts: 4,787
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My bet is that almost nobody on this thread has had anything like the 0-60 times they are quoting.
The fact is lack of skill and too much mechanical sympathu means that most Impreza drivers are going to be in the 7 second category regardless of what power they may think they have.
The fact is lack of skill and too much mechanical sympathu means that most Impreza drivers are going to be in the 7 second category regardless of what power they may think they have.
#24
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: SE London
Posts: 977
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
myblackwrx - thanks - it appears that mine (UK 2002 WRX Wagon) is 218ps (215bhp), 0-60 in 5.9.
NACRO - that is probably true of almost any car unless you have an auto or launch control!
NACRO - that is probably true of almost any car unless you have an auto or launch control!
Last edited by escott; 29 October 2007 at 01:54 PM.
#25
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Wanting the English to come first in England for a change!
Posts: 2,091
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Agree with nacro, not many people i know launch their performance cars properly anyway, give it 4 or 4.5k revs and drop the clutch and see what happens! (not in the wet though, it will fishtail)
#26
BANNED
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Your home is worthless.You can't afford to run your car.Your job is on the line.Schadenfreude rules.
Posts: 4,787
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
That's why I wonder why people insist on quoting theoretical times they will never/have never achieved. Never mind the fact that many older and poorly modified cars are probably down on power or have wrecked drivetrains which means that the owners may as well just make some power and performance figures up for all they are worth.
Obviously there are a minority of people out there with cars in rude health and that have worthwhile mods- I'm betting they can't reproduce their cars best consistently either.
Obviously there are a minority of people out there with cars in rude health and that have worthwhile mods- I'm betting they can't reproduce their cars best consistently either.
#27
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
That's why I wonder why people insist on quoting theoretical times they will never/have never achieved. Never mind the fact that many older and poorly modified cars are probably down on power or have wrecked drivetrains which means that the owners may as well just make some power and performance figures up for all they are worth.
Obviously there are a minority of people out there with cars in rude health and that have worthwhile mods- I'm betting they can't reproduce their cars best consistently either.
Obviously there are a minority of people out there with cars in rude health and that have worthwhile mods- I'm betting they can't reproduce their cars best consistently either.
And as many a thread on here it's how it feels rather than pub talk figures
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Scott@ScoobySpares
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
61
11 January 2021 03:08 PM
Scott@ScoobySpares
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
7
14 December 2015 08:16 AM
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
20
22 October 2015 06:12 AM