How accurate is this?!
07 January 2007, 11:07 PM
#1
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Mansfield. Nottingham
Posts: 604
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
07 January 2007, 11:08 PM
#2
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Roundhouse
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
07 January 2007, 11:09 PM
#3
Heres mine.. lol.
Admittedly i guessed the weight of my STI7
Power at Flywheel (BHP) : 340
Weight without Driver (KG) : 1400
Power to Weight Ratio (BHP Per Ton) : 246.76
0 - 60 (Secs) : 4.17
0 - 100 (Secs) : 10.73
60 - 100 (Secs) : 6.56
Quarter Mile (Secs) : 12.83
Terminal Speed (MPH) : 109.35
Drag Strip Quarter Mile (Secs) : 12.43
Drag Strip Terminal Speed (MPH) : 112.96
Admittedly i guessed the weight of my STI7
Power at Flywheel (BHP) : 340
Weight without Driver (KG) : 1400
Power to Weight Ratio (BHP Per Ton) : 246.76
0 - 60 (Secs) : 4.17
0 - 100 (Secs) : 10.73
60 - 100 (Secs) : 6.56
Quarter Mile (Secs) : 12.83
Terminal Speed (MPH) : 109.35
Drag Strip Quarter Mile (Secs) : 12.43
Drag Strip Terminal Speed (MPH) : 112.96
07 January 2007, 11:13 PM
#6
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (46)
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Probably polishing it.Lol
Posts: 5,381
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Like it.
But if i replace the 4 wheel drive with rear wheel drive, the 1\4 mile time is the same and going off, "losing power due to transmission loss"....is it accurate?
But if i replace the 4 wheel drive with rear wheel drive, the 1\4 mile time is the same and going off, "losing power due to transmission loss"....is it accurate?
Trending Topics
08 January 2007, 12:04 AM
#8
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Bristol-ish
Posts: 2,085
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Not bad, but also doesn't take into account gearing.
For example, most cars can make 60mph in 2nd, my WRX needs to be in third - the extra gearchange must cost some time!!
For example, most cars can make 60mph in 2nd, my WRX needs to be in third - the extra gearchange must cost some time!!
08 January 2007, 06:47 AM
#10
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Mansfield. Nottingham
Posts: 604
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Say if you tap in some stock numbers, for example, an mg zr 160, weighing only 1070kg unladen, it has 158bhp, that acheives 0-60 in 7.23 or sumthin on the website, and the manuf. quoted 7.3, it really is not that far away if you tap in some different cars!
08 January 2007, 11:34 AM
#11
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: 392/361 MY04 STi
Posts: 7,638
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If it does this then i'm happy:
Power at Flywheel (BHP) : 371
Weight without Driver (KG) : 1400
Power to Weight Ratio (BHP Per Ton) : 269.25
0 - 60 (Secs) : 3.89
0 - 100 (Secs) : 9.85
60 - 100 (Secs) : 5.97
Quarter Mile (Secs) : 12.52
Terminal Speed (MPH) : 112.70
Drag Strip Quarter Mile (Secs) : 12.12
Drag Strip Terminal Speed (MPH) : 116.47
...and i haven't had to launch it or give it abuse. Nice!
Power at Flywheel (BHP) : 371
Weight without Driver (KG) : 1400
Power to Weight Ratio (BHP Per Ton) : 269.25
0 - 60 (Secs) : 3.89
0 - 100 (Secs) : 9.85
60 - 100 (Secs) : 5.97
Quarter Mile (Secs) : 12.52
Terminal Speed (MPH) : 112.70
Drag Strip Quarter Mile (Secs) : 12.12
Drag Strip Terminal Speed (MPH) : 116.47
...and i haven't had to launch it or give it abuse. Nice!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Scott@ScoobySpares
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
61
11 January 2021 03:08 PM
Scott@ScoobySpares
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
55
05 August 2018 07:02 AM
Scott@ScoobySpares
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
7
14 December 2015 08:16 AM