mot and decats??
#5
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Sheffield; Rome of the North
Posts: 17,582
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
A catalytic converter isnt required, but if we are being pedantic an Imported WRX will only have to pass the more stringent test if its date of first use is recorded as 010995 onwards.....
#7
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Oxford- the shire
Posts: 1,281
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks, that has been a great help, i tried a search of the forums, as i assumed this sort of question came up all the time, but i just couldnt find the answer i was looking for, but now i know i do not require a cat for my 93 wrx.
Trending Topics
#8
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Nothing to do with YOU !!
Posts: 1,165
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
my husband is an mot tester he said it is"before 19992 the max permitted co is 3.5%. After 1992 max co 0.30%"
If the vehicle is an import and not on the emission list the vehicle must be tested as a non cat vehicle. Hope this helps"
If the vehicle is an import and not on the emission list the vehicle must be tested as a non cat vehicle. Hope this helps"
#10
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Nothing to do with YOU !!
Posts: 1,165
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
he said the majority of japanese imported cars have catalytic convertors on already to pass the strict emission laws in japan.
one of the reasons that the uk have had such an influx of imported vehicles is that most of them aren't able to pass the emissions so therefore they have to get rid of the vehicle. he is also led to believe that to own a car in japan, the owner has to be able to afford the parking space which he buys from the government, if he cannot afford to pay for the space, then he has to sell the car! that is what he has been led to believe, and i hope that he is right cos it took me ages to type this in
one of the reasons that the uk have had such an influx of imported vehicles is that most of them aren't able to pass the emissions so therefore they have to get rid of the vehicle. he is also led to believe that to own a car in japan, the owner has to be able to afford the parking space which he buys from the government, if he cannot afford to pay for the space, then he has to sell the car! that is what he has been led to believe, and i hope that he is right cos it took me ages to type this in
#11
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: bath/plymouth
Posts: 548
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
your probably right about the japanese stuff! Thats where mine came from but it now has a brand new engine and no cats in its exhaust whatsoever!! As well as a fair few other tastefull engine mods.. It still flies through and its a 1994 model.
#13
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: At the bottom of a glass
Posts: 1,462
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I know Japanese emission tests are strict......... so why does my import have 2 cats where the UK one has 3? I have no centre cat - but a resonator instead.
Mine was imported new - not an emission failure
Mine was imported new - not an emission failure
#15
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Andover
Posts: 354
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The advice from the MOT tester is correct. While it is true that all the old jap cars have cats the have to be selected on the test machine (computer) AS AN EXACT MATCH. As there is no match for an import car then they only have to pass the static idle test up to 95.
There is no part of the test that calls for an examination to see if a cat is fitted as this is impossible anyway. (ie - how do you tell the difference between a cat and a resonator just by looking at the outside?)
There is no part of the test that calls for an examination to see if a cat is fitted as this is impossible anyway. (ie - how do you tell the difference between a cat and a resonator just by looking at the outside?)
#17
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Andover
Posts: 354
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
GC8 - is that date of registration or manufacture?
Sometimes the V5 is all over the place on imports - i found the best way on Mitsi Pajeros was that the DOM was printed on a ticket at the bottom of each seatbelt!!
Is ther room to negotiate/argue with the tester as to the actual date for boarderline cases?
Sometimes the V5 is all over the place on imports - i found the best way on Mitsi Pajeros was that the DOM was printed on a ticket at the bottom of each seatbelt!!
Is ther room to negotiate/argue with the tester as to the actual date for boarderline cases?
#18
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Sheffield; Rome of the North
Posts: 17,582
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
To the best of my knowledge its the date of first use, because the exact date of manufacture cant be ascertained. Ive fallen foul of that with a car manufactured just in time but not registered in Japan until the following year.
Simon
Simon
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
fatboy_coach
General Technical
15
18 June 2016 03:48 PM
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
28
28 December 2015 11:07 PM