MY DYNO SHEET 413lbs OF TORQUE
03 December 2006, 01:34 PM
#1
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
MY DYNO SHEET 413lbs OF TORQUE
06 sti re-map at prosport ,,,does anyone believe me now
http://i119.photobucket.com/albums/o...b_01/remap.jpg
http://i119.photobucket.com/albums/o...b_01/remap.jpg
03 December 2006, 02:04 PM
#4
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (20)
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: 8.95 @ 168mph. Zero to 1KM 194.1mph
Posts: 1,150
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It's a little hard to seen in the graph you posted, but your power, & torque don't appear to cross at 5252rpm ? You can check this on the original.
If they don't cross at that point, the figures are incorrect, no if's, or but's, they are wrong.
Realistically, to get 413ftlbs of torque @ 3450rpm from a 2.0lt, you would have to run over 2 bar of boost.
Now if you had a 2.5lt engine, it's very possible, but the graph still looks wrong.
Mark.
If they don't cross at that point, the figures are incorrect, no if's, or but's, they are wrong.
Realistically, to get 413ftlbs of torque @ 3450rpm from a 2.0lt, you would have to run over 2 bar of boost.
Now if you had a 2.5lt engine, it's very possible, but the graph still looks wrong.
Mark.
03 December 2006, 02:12 PM
#5
Originally Posted by jakeob
06 sti re-map at prosport ,,,does anyone believe me now
http://i119.photobucket.com/albums/o...b_01/remap.jpg
http://i119.photobucket.com/albums/o...b_01/remap.jpg
03 December 2006, 02:29 PM
#7
Scooby Regular
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Ascended to the next level
Posts: 7,498
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Davey P
Just out of interest, why should the power and torque cross at 5252rpm?
Cheers,
Dave
Cheers,
Dave
Basic mathematics: bhp = torque x rpm/5252
Power is calculated by touque, revs and the magic calculation constant 5252. Which, when plotted on a graph of the same scale shows both curves cross at that particular rpm.
The above graph has the BHP scale different to the torque scale, so it doesn't cross at 5252rpm. It doesn't mean the graph is wrong, just the plot BHP scale on the left is in different increments to the torque scale. For it to it to cross at 5252 they need to be plotted on a graph with identical tourque and bhp scales (if that makes sense
)If you look at the BHP @ 5252rpm its roughly 345bhp (blue curve), now look at the torque scale at 345lb/ft and follow across, you'll see you'll meet the torque curve (red curve) at 5252rpm. So the figues are right, just the scaling is not done in the normal manner.
Last edited by Shark Man; 03 December 2006 at 02:36 PM.
Trending Topics
03 December 2006, 03:18 PM
#9
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (20)
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: 8.95 @ 168mph. Zero to 1KM 194.1mph
Posts: 1,150
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My mistake, I should have said that they should cross if they use the same scaling, which having looked at the graph again, they don't !
I wish the rolling road operators would use the same scaling, otherwise it just distorts the graph.
Mark.
I wish the rolling road operators would use the same scaling, otherwise it just distorts the graph.
Mark.
03 December 2006, 03:35 PM
#10
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yes i have said before it IS a 2.5L motor not a 2.0L
I thought all 06 sti's were 2.5L other than the spec c's
So whats the verdict??? does my print out seem genuine or what
I thought all 06 sti's were 2.5L other than the spec c's
So whats the verdict??? does my print out seem genuine or what
03 December 2006, 03:51 PM
#11
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,976
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Sorry but I still think something is wrong there.
A Type 25 puts out that kind of torque figure and that's with supporting mods (cams, different heads, different turbo etc). I just can't see you getting that kind of torque figure from a CAT back exhaust, filter and a re-map. Realistically I would've said around the 340/350 lbs ft mark.
A Type 25 puts out that kind of torque figure and that's with supporting mods (cams, different heads, different turbo etc). I just can't see you getting that kind of torque figure from a CAT back exhaust, filter and a re-map. Realistically I would've said around the 340/350 lbs ft mark.
03 December 2006, 03:58 PM
#12
Scooby Regular
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Ascended to the next level
Posts: 7,498
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Picks up nicely at a decent rpm (250lb/ft @2500 
) seems to drop off quite a bit though. What gear was this run taken in? Have you a plot of the turbo pressure? I'd guess it overshoots a bit when it kicks in before the wastegate has chance to reigns it back in (thus that shove in the back) .
) seems to drop off quite a bit though. What gear was this run taken in? Have you a plot of the turbo pressure? I'd guess it overshoots a bit when it kicks in before the wastegate has chance to reigns it back in (thus that shove in the back) .
03 December 2006, 04:51 PM
#14
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So i think its safe to say you lot are no fans of Prosport in
Manchester. If petes reading this he must be getting pretty pissed of by now.
I had my last car Mapped there and they did an exelent job, and it went like F""K... and guess what ? its still going with no problems. I will get back to you next week if it doesnt blow up
cheers
Manchester. If petes reading this he must be getting pretty pissed of by now.
I had my last car Mapped there and they did an exelent job, and it went like F""K... and guess what ? its still going with no problems. I will get back to you next week if it doesnt blow up
cheers
03 December 2006, 08:11 PM
#20
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: liverpool the capital of culture 08
Posts: 14,025
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 555pro
Paul the car has a full decat exhaust and several hours were spent mapping this car,please dont go down the road you went with mike chows p1.
Thanks Peter.
Thanks Peter.
03 December 2006, 10:53 PM
#22
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: liverpool the capital of culture 08
Posts: 14,025
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by bighead
I think it the man himself...1st appearance on Scobynet !
nice to see the main man on here though his knowledge will surely help us all
03 December 2006, 10:57 PM
#24
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: There is only one God - Elvis!
Posts: 8,328
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 555pro
Paul the car has a full decat exhaust and several hours were spent mapping this car,please dont go down the road you went with mike chows p1.
Thanks Peter.
Thanks Peter.
Welcome to Scoobynet Pete
04 December 2006, 11:16 AM
#27
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: West Yorkshire
Posts: 4,778
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by jasonius
How do you save the graph image to .jpg from an excel file..?
Not very good with excel and can't see anything obvious, like right clicking etc..
Not very good with excel and can't see anything obvious, like right clicking etc..
Open paint, then edit & paste
Then save as, give it a name, change the file type from .bmp to .jpeg
HTH
04 December 2006, 12:08 PM
#30
Scooby Regular
mates 06sti ran 380ftlb with remap, decat and typhoon induction kit.
my own car is running about 20ftlb higher than norm (uk classic turbo) so tbh extra 30ftlb isn't that unbelieveable, after all, no two cars are the same
my own car is running about 20ftlb higher than norm (uk classic turbo) so tbh extra 30ftlb isn't that unbelieveable, after all, no two cars are the same