Notices
ScoobyNet General General Subaru Discussion
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Subaru flat 4 versus V versus in line

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 16 April 2006, 10:06 PM
  #1  
tim's wrx
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
tim's wrx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 387
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Subaru flat 4 versus V versus in line

thought this was interesting


http://www.subaru.com.mt/html/leftfr...300/index.html
Old 16 April 2006, 10:18 PM
  #2  
Paulo P
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (42)
 
Paulo P's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Bucks
Posts: 23,797
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

That's an interesting thought. I wonder if it really makes any difference though.
Old 16 April 2006, 10:22 PM
  #3  
banny sti
Scooby Senior
iTrader: (68)
 
banny sti's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Type R
Posts: 16,598
Received 22 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by paulpalmer
That's an interesting thought. I wonder if it really makes any difference though.
Flat four layout is smoother as the opposing pistons cancel the vibrations out. Looking good in jap tuner mag paul!
Old 16 April 2006, 11:11 PM
  #4  
James Neill
Scooby Senior
iTrader: (1)
 
James Neill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Posts: 2,889
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The inline model shows the crank shaft going up and down. Is that really right?
Old 16 April 2006, 11:16 PM
  #5  
ALi-B
Moderator
Support Scoobynet!
iTrader: (1)
 
ALi-B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: The hell where youth and laughter go
Posts: 38,034
Received 301 Likes on 240 Posts
Default

Something else of interest:

http://www.e31.net/engines_e.html

Yup nice and smooth...Only for it all to be messed up by unequal length headers

Can't beat a straight 6 or V12 though
Old 16 April 2006, 11:32 PM
  #6  
Bubba po
Scooby Regular
 
Bubba po's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Cas Vegas
Posts: 60,269
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by James Neill
The inline model shows the crank shaft going up and down. Is that really right?
Only in an extremely exaggerated way. It's showing the direction of vibration, not the true extent.
Old 16 April 2006, 11:37 PM
  #7  
Bubba po
Scooby Regular
 
Bubba po's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Cas Vegas
Posts: 60,269
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ALi-B

Yup nice and smooth...Only for it all to be messed up by unequal length headers
)
Which makes it sound wonderful.
Old 16 April 2006, 11:56 PM
  #8  
ALi-B
Moderator
Support Scoobynet!
iTrader: (1)
 
ALi-B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: The hell where youth and laughter go
Posts: 38,034
Received 301 Likes on 240 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Bubba po
Which makes it sound woeful.
Old 17 April 2006, 02:02 AM
  #9  
Anders_WR1
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (8)
 
Anders_WR1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Surrey
Posts: 1,405
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ALi-B
Something else of interest:

http://www.e31.net/engines_e.html

Yup nice and smooth...Only for it all to be messed up by unequal length headers

Can't beat a straight 6 or V12 though
Is the design on the two cylinder right? It seems mad to have the pistons going up and down at the same time. Why not have them split by 180 degrees like this?

http://www.billandelaine.co.uk/scoobystuff/2c.jpg

Anders
Old 17 April 2006, 08:19 AM
  #10  
wide
Scooby Regular
 
wide's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,665
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Isnt that the reason for engine mountings
Old 17 April 2006, 11:47 AM
  #11  
ALi-B
Moderator
Support Scoobynet!
iTrader: (1)
 
ALi-B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: The hell where youth and laughter go
Posts: 38,034
Received 301 Likes on 240 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Anders_WR1
Is the design on the two cylinder right? It seems mad to have the pistons going up and down at the same time. Why not have them split by 180 degrees like this?

http://www.billandelaine.co.uk/scoobystuff/2c.jpg

Anders

Yup it is correct: It's a parallel twin...almost every old British twin cylinder motorbike ever made is like that (one cylinder at TDC on exhaust, other at TDC on compression/ignition). Gives a great sensation through the nads when you wind them up to 5000rpm

Last edited by ALi-B; 17 April 2006 at 11:49 AM.
Old 17 April 2006, 11:58 AM
  #12  
Welloilbeefhooked
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
Welloilbeefhooked's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Sheffield
Posts: 3,577
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Its not the crank that is going up and down, its the centre of gravity that the engine is altering slightly. Think I'm right on this.
Old 17 April 2006, 12:03 PM
  #13  
ALi-B
Moderator
Support Scoobynet!
iTrader: (1)
 
ALi-B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: The hell where youth and laughter go
Posts: 38,034
Received 301 Likes on 240 Posts
Default

What is interesting is on bikes is the gyroscopic effect. An engine with a large rotating mass will actually be harder to lean into bends. You'd think just teh wheels would cause this, obviously. But the engine does too.

I doubt it would have any effect on a car as the overall weight difference of the chassis vs rotating mass of the engine is far too negliable to have any effect. And the balance of the engine would be a similar story.

Last edited by ALi-B; 17 April 2006 at 12:05 PM.
Old 17 April 2006, 12:08 PM
  #14  
Gary C
Scooby Regular
 
Gary C's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,301
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

what bollocks, how many inline car engines have a single cyclinder or all 4 going up and down together.

when 2 are going up, 2 are going down. The masses are roughly balanced and some 4's have a balancer shaft to ofset the small amount of imbalance in a 4 but its more for NVH than any affect on the chassis.

Marketing bollocks
Old 17 April 2006, 12:08 PM
  #15  
Baggers
Scooby Regular
 
Baggers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

fantastic links, interesting reading. Maybe an insight into the scoob vs evo maintenance / failure related experiences.
Old 17 April 2006, 12:54 PM
  #16  
KiwiGTI
Scooby Regular
 
KiwiGTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 4,631
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:4-Stroke-Engine.gif

looks nicer.
Old 17 April 2006, 01:48 PM
  #17  
KiwiGTI
Scooby Regular
 
KiwiGTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 4,631
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

This was interesting too.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boxer_engine
Old 17 April 2006, 05:34 PM
  #18  
Anders_WR1
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (8)
 
Anders_WR1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Surrey
Posts: 1,405
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ALi-B
Yup it is correct: It's a parallel twin...almost every old British twin cylinder motorbike ever made is like that (one cylinder at TDC on exhaust, other at TDC on compression/ignition). Gives a great sensation through the nads when you wind them up to 5000rpm
So what's the technical benefit, apart from making the bird on the back of your bike smile? Couldn't you fit smaller weights on the crank if it was designed the other way?
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Pro-Line Motorsport
Car Parts For Sale
48
21 July 2017 09:50 PM
Abx
Subaru
22
09 January 2016 05:42 PM
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
28
28 December 2015 11:07 PM
Pro-Line Motorsport
Car Parts For Sale
2
29 September 2015 07:36 PM
Pro-Line Motorsport
Car Parts For Sale
0
27 September 2015 11:23 AM



Quick Reply: Subaru flat 4 versus V versus in line



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:58 AM.