MY06 500c more but no extra bhp , what gives ?.
#1
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Leeds
Posts: 230
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
MY06 500c more but no extra bhp , what gives ?.
Ive been wanting to ask this for a while but wanted to see if anyone else asked first. At the risk of sounding stupid , why does the MY06 have 500cc extra capacity but only adds a couple of bhp over the 2.0 . Is the potential for tuning greater cos I cant see the point of the engine change.
#3
The major difference I have noticed is the lessened lag and the responsiveness down low compared to the 2.0L.
It's a torquey little bugger and makes round town driving so much more liveable with. Opening her up is just as good, but much more smooth than before.
It's a torquey little bugger and makes round town driving so much more liveable with. Opening her up is just as good, but much more smooth than before.
#4
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Swilling coffee at my lab bench
Posts: 9,096
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think you'll find the real reason is emissions. MY06 is the first car that legally has to pass the Euro IV emissions standard, and that means it has to be tuned to be as clean as possible, not as powerful. The extra 0.5 litre is really there to maintain power at existing levels, not increase it.
Trending Topics
#8
Moderator
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: The Terry Crews of moderation. P P P P P P POWER!!
Posts: 18,687
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by AndyC_772
I think you'll find the real reason is emissions. MY06 is the first car that legally has to pass the Euro IV emissions standard, and that means it has to be tuned to be as clean as possible, not as powerful. The extra 0.5 litre is really there to maintain power at existing levels, not increase it.
Ns04
#9
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Swilling coffee at my lab bench
Posts: 9,096
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
fallwood: In theory yes, but there's a lot more to it than just displacement. You still need to flow more air and fuel, and still need to make sure the engine and transmission are strong enough to handle the extra torque without breaking.
I honestly doubt we'll see reliable 2.5 cars that are much more powerful than their 2.0 cousins, comparing like-for-like in terms of tuning budget.
I honestly doubt we'll see reliable 2.5 cars that are much more powerful than their 2.0 cousins, comparing like-for-like in terms of tuning budget.
#12
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Swilling coffee at my lab bench
Posts: 9,096
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Paul3446
Is it not slightly ironic that by tightening emissions the EU are forcing manufacturers to produce cars with bigger engines?
The same goes for safety too; a safer car is a stronger and therefore heavier one, so it burns more fuel and produces more pollution. That's another inescapable trade-off, there's no win-win situation.
#13
Perhaps we should start a discussion on how much the standard pistons on a 2.5 will take, as opposed to say a newage 2ltr and then the tuning capabilities using the stock 2.5ltr engine may look less appealing. In essence, I think I will stick with my feeble under torqued 2ltr.
Regards,
Shaun.
Regards,
Shaun.
#14
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Crawley
Posts: 444
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
For euro IV the My06 has grown from 2.0L to 2.5L and for the same reason the Toyota Coralla TTE has now added a Supercharger to get it through euro IV ! So although I know I'm talking total rubbish in theory by euro VIII we could have compound charged 5.0L nitros cars!
Col
Col
#18
Originally Posted by scoobfan
I'm hearing stories that the 2.5 is not as "tuneable" as the good ole 2.0,
can this be true
Rob
can this be true
Rob
Are the cylinders thinner?
Are the pistons made of ****ite?
God knows, we do hear some stories on here though...
dipster.
#19
Originally Posted by Leeroy
Are the quoted power figures for the new Sti/WRX accurate - or are they conservative like skyline etc to keep under 280 'gentlemens agreement'?
dipster.
#20
Ecu Specialist
The std 2.5 engines are definatley not as "relatively" tunable and do have piston issues if pushed too far. Also the WRX has the Forrester intercooler which is little bigger than an early slanted one, that alone will/should give tuners cause for caution, that said its still tunable with its limits.
As Shaun points out the 2 litre is still "relatively" better to tune in std guise.
cheers
bob
As Shaun points out the 2 litre is still "relatively" better to tune in std guise.
cheers
bob
#24
Former Sponsor
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: www.Litchfieldimports.co.uk
Posts: 820
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I would imagine the Evo's that are in the country were built before the begining of 2006. The Evo's engine set-up is better suited to emissions testing than the Impreza.
Iain
Iain
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post