evo magazine
16 October 2001, 07:13 PM
#5
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: london
Posts: 819
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
what i really wanded to know from the article was is the suspension and settings for the rb5 the same as a standard scooby ,except of course the bigger wheels.because in the article the stndard scooby didnt fare to well.do you think my ppp1999 scooby is the same as a rb5 [without the cosmetics and bigger wheels]
16 October 2001, 07:35 PM
#6
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 590
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The RB5 tested had the same suspension as the turbo they used. Only differences between the cars was power for the RB5 (237bhp, 258lbs) and the RB5 had 205/45 ZR17 P-Zero against the stock turbo's 205/50 R16 RE101
Hope that helps
Rich
Hope that helps
Rich
17 October 2001, 08:24 AM
#7
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 946
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yhe chod
It wasnt that they didnt like the MY99 it was just that they thought the RB5 was slightly better with the WR mods and they couldn't have all the scoobs in the final round.
It wasnt that they didnt like the MY99 it was just that they thought the RB5 was slightly better with the WR mods and they couldn't have all the scoobs in the final round.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Wingnuttzz
Member's Gallery
30
26 April 2022 11:15 PM