Notices
ScoobyNet General General Subaru Discussion
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

0 - 60 mph

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 25 August 2000, 12:44 AM
  #1  
Fosters
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
Fosters's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Islington
Posts: 2,145
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

So if a UK turbo is around 5.7 and an STi is around 4.7 (is that fair?), where does a PPP'd UK scoob figure in the 0-60 times?
Old 25 August 2000, 12:47 AM
  #2  
GaryC
Scooby Regular
 
GaryC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Posts: 1,999
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

EVO did the RB5 WR in 4.9 2-up, half tank of petrol
Old 25 August 2000, 12:58 AM
  #3  
Yex
Scooby Regular
 
Yex's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 1999
Posts: 1,030
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool

2 up, half a tank of petrol and 4.9 seconds you say

Going shopping tonight with wifey....might give it a try

Yex
Old 25 August 2000, 10:34 AM
  #4  
Dave Stephens
Scooby Newbie
 
Dave Stephens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Subaru quote 6.3 seconds for the MY00
Other sources say different

What is the real pace of a turbo?
Old 25 August 2000, 10:44 AM
  #5  
SecretAgentMan
Scooby Regular
 
SecretAgentMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,912
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool

Around 5.7 is more like it.
Old 25 August 2000, 11:47 AM
  #6  
Puff The Magic Wagon!
Moderator
Support Scoobynet!
iTrader: (2)
 
Puff The Magic Wagon!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: From far, far away...
Posts: 16,978
Received 15 Likes on 9 Posts
Talking

5.8s 2up with full tank of u/leaded (+ towbar )

Old 25 August 2000, 11:54 AM
  #7  
subverbal
Scooby Regular
 
subverbal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 193
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Look at the SIDC web site (sidc.co.uk). They have a performance section with all the various test times. Times range from just over 5 to just over 6 - 5.7 sounds good to me too though.

Neil.

Trending Topics

Old 25 August 2000, 11:58 AM
  #8  
GaryC
Scooby Regular
 
GaryC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Posts: 1,999
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Performance car got a standard MY98 to 62 in 5.05, but that was only one up with enough fuel to get to the end of the strip!!
Old 25 August 2000, 01:02 PM
  #9  
MorayMackenzie
Scooby Senior
 
MorayMackenzie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Posts: 3,410
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool

Sub 4 is possible in modded STI.
Old 25 August 2000, 01:03 PM
  #10  
BrewandBake
Scooby Regular
 
BrewandBake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

MY 94/95/96's were clocked at around 5.8
MY 97/8/99/00's are usually around 5.3-5.5
Later STi's & P1's around 4.6/4.7

Brew.
Old 25 August 2000, 02:47 PM
  #11  
Don Palmer
Scooby Regular
 
Don Palmer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool

Why live with the dissadvantage of cold turbo engines and four wheel traction that are slugs from a standing start? (ooooo that's contensious isn't it tho) :-)
Go for a time from 30 to 100 and you'll kill most of the opposition.

Old 25 August 2000, 02:50 PM
  #12  
BrewandBake
Scooby Regular
 
BrewandBake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

4.6secs to 60 is a slug ????

[this will really make me popular]
According to AutoCar a Fiat Coupe Turbo is faster to 100 than a standard UK Scoob Turbo.
Old 25 August 2000, 03:24 PM
  #13  
Stef
Scooby Regular
 
Stef's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Posts: 3,055
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

I keep hearing about how std STi's can do 0-60 in 4.7 secs, but have never seen one get under 6 secs at the 0-60 run at Silverstone, primarily because they seem to have to change into third gear.
They may not be launching the car ideally, but 1.3+ secs is a big difference.
Perhaps we can get a few STi's to have a go at TRAX in a couple of weeks?
Oh, and at the recent REVS shoot-out, Craig managed 4.3secs in his STi, and I managed 4.5secs in my UK car, in the wet! Both only have exhaust/filter mods. Just in case any of you had forgotten.
Maybe we'll get a 0-60 run set up at a forthcoming SIDC track day?

Stef.
Old 25 August 2000, 03:27 PM
  #14  
john banks
Scooby Regular
 
john banks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: 32 cylinders and many cats
Posts: 18,658
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Cool

Fiat Coupe Turbo was faster than Scoob in one Autocar test (and they admitted that car was a crap example). According to Top Gear, What Car, Evo, Autoexpress and Car from memory I think you'll find the Scoob is faster every time
Most figures of UK scoob 0-60 are between 5.2 & 5.5 and 0-100 in 14.5s.
BTW, have you actually tried a Fiat Coupe? (a secret owner perhaps ) - torque steer city Totally outclassed by Scoob!
Old 25 August 2000, 04:12 PM
  #15  
Tang
Scooby Regular
 
Tang's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Smile

I have a PPP'd MY 00 (also has DEP), and can confirm that it feels a lot faster than 5 secs to 60 (more like 4.25), again tho' was done with fuel vapour and just me, and no stop watch, just 1000,2000,3000.....Did 0-60 with a friend and a watch and hit 5 dead with full tank - car had only done 2000 miles at that point so its bound to have loosened since then (now at 7500).

Agree with above comment that 30-100 is more relevant, think though that most relevant is 50-100 which Scoob is very suited to.

Tang
Old 25 August 2000, 05:16 PM
  #16  
Craig H
Scooby Regular
 
Craig H's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Posts: 770
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

The only way to get accurate results is with timing gear.
I don't think anyone could get a UK car with the same mods to beat Stefs time.
Reckon a little could be shaved off mine with a decent driver though. Or a lot, depending how good the new engine is
6 secs to sixty isn't exactly a blinding time for an STi.
Old 25 August 2000, 11:48 PM
  #17  
Paul Wilson
Scooby Regular
 
Paul Wilson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Posts: 906
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

60 seems to be a bad speed to test the STi's at, I know mine needs a change at 57mph, but I would imagine that although the STi may be slower/the same to 60, it would be ahead the whole time, (excluding launches by those with well used warranties )

p.s. 0-60 in 9 secs for me, thats with the caterham on the back
Old 26 August 2000, 09:13 AM
  #18  
Trout
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Trout's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 15,271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Autocar did 4.6 for an STi IV; 5.3 for MY99, 5.6 UK WR PPP; 5.0 22B.

EVO did 4.7 for an STi V, but only 5.2 for a STi V Type R - impact of that extra gear change.

Bottom line, any attempt to get it under 5, or even 6, ***** your clutch and gearbox - isn't that right Stef

I want a Forester STI, 0-60 in less than 6s, in a TRUCK!

R

[This message has been edited by Rannoch (edited 26 August 2000).]
Old 26 August 2000, 04:32 PM
  #19  
Stef
Scooby Regular
 
Stef's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Posts: 3,055
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Oi! I'll have you know that my original clutch lasted 30,000 miles and the gearbox didn't fail until 48,000 miles.
Despite what people may think, I am not particularly hard on either when I launch, that is, I don't 'dump' the clutch.
Anyway, my warranty is up soon, so I won't be visiting The Pod quite as much, if at all. I don't think I can get any more from my car anyhow in it's current guise.
The AP clutch is worth it's weight in gold though.

Stef.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Shaun
Other Marques
33
26 October 2015 10:57 AM
InTurbo
ScoobyNet General
21
30 September 2015 08:59 PM
shorty87
Other Marques
0
25 September 2015 08:52 PM
smunns
Dealer and Third Party Supplier Queries
5
14 September 2015 08:08 PM



Quick Reply: 0 - 60 mph



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:39 PM.