Which is the prettier
#3
I was told by a designer that the Scoob has a confusion of lines in the front below the grille and you could not clearly see where its pupils were....I had just managed to convince myself how nice-looking it was.
Trending Topics
#10
Scooby Regular
Both ugly family saloon cars with almost tasteless motorsport inspired bodywork revisions, but as j4mou says, it's the attitude you go for. The performance lures you into appreciating the looks, but they are both very ugly from a design or style POV. I prefer Scoobs BTW
#12
Agreed - neither could be classed as pretty but even though I would have said scooby if we were talking about the classic, the evo is starting to look leaner and more purposeful when you compare current models.
#16
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: ShyTot graphics Location: Squires Bar Location: Wakecastlefract
Posts: 8,048
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Prettiest? Neither.
Meanest, most purposeful and downright best? Evo.
Long journey, or steady run out? Scoob.
Last edited by Sticky Stuff; 13 June 2004 at 12:50 AM. Reason: pic resize
#17
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Texas - It's BIG!
Posts: 2,105
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Neither are attractive, I think, purposeful and well designed, yes, but who in their right mind would buy either of these cars for their looks and not their capabilities. Love my scoob as I do!
Good looking cars generally hail from Europe and cost five times as much, imo.
Or eight times as much, thinking about the Maranello I was behind in the park today....
Good looking cars generally hail from Europe and cost five times as much, imo.
Or eight times as much, thinking about the Maranello I was behind in the park today....
#18
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: 1994 WRX STI VERSION 1 No. 21/200
Posts: 2,803
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by corradoboy
Both ugly family saloon cars with almost tasteless motorsport inspired bodywork revisions, but as j4mou says, it's the attitude you go for. The performance lures you into appreciating the looks, but they are both very ugly from a design or style POV. I prefer Scoobs BTW
Brian.
#19
i hate threads like this only answered by plebs "they are both ugly" ffs would u ever buy anything u considered to be ugly? i wouldnt even by a TV if i thought it was ugly looking.
trying to fool urself comes to mind.
trying to fool urself comes to mind.
#20
Scooby Regular
Originally Posted by Madjay2
would u ever buy anything u considered to be ugly?
#23
Originally Posted by Madjay2
i hate threads like this only answered by plebs "they are both ugly" ffs would u ever buy anything u considered to be ugly? i wouldnt even by a TV if i thought it was ugly looking.
trying to fool urself comes to mind.
trying to fool urself comes to mind.
SPOT ON
#24
I think I've only owned one good looking car, and I still own it, but it's not my scoob, although I wouldn't class that as ugly. My VR6 Corrado still puts it in the shade, even though it's 10 years old.
#25
Originally Posted by Madjay2
i think bull**** comes to mind, everyone else says they are ugly so i think i'll follow suit and make up and excuse why i have one.
Come on man, how old are you? Different strokes for different folks! Just because looks are important to you, it doesn't make it the case for everyone else - you ain't the blueprint from which the rest of the world was made!
If someone tells you they like their car for what it is/does, not for how it looks, just accept it - there's no need to insult them. Your reasons for buying a car don't mean squat to anybody else, so get over yourself.
#26
Madjay - I can't for the life of me understand plebs who reply to their own replies on internet bbs' but hey thats life eh? Ever heard of function over form?? Thats why I bought a scoob - it does what it says on the tin. Theres no way you can tell me that a scoob is a 'pretty' car...it just aint! Theres plenty of positive things you can say about them but 'pretty'??? nah.
#27
u lot are children
and where did i reply to my own reply? i just added a bit extra and couldnt be ****ed pressing the edit post button as it is quicker to use the QUICK REPLY button.
i still think you are all talking complete bollox you like the look of your car and you know it, the only reason you say you dont because other people have told you that you dont.
and where did i reply to my own reply? i just added a bit extra and couldnt be ****ed pressing the edit post button as it is quicker to use the QUICK REPLY button.
i still think you are all talking complete bollox you like the look of your car and you know it, the only reason you say you dont because other people have told you that you dont.
#28
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: Cardiff. Wales
Posts: 11,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by dij
Everyone to their own opinion.
Please dont let this become another "which car is faster thread?",we all know the evo is quicker.
Please dont let this become another "which car is faster thread?",we all know the evo is quicker.
Chip.
#30
Cooking on Calor
iTrader: (23)
why buy bits to modify the exterior if its ugly???
to make it look better perhaps?
been to the nbo today, and seen some great cars.
even people that have rb5, 22b and type r modify them. why?
because its their car and its their choice.
i used to dislike the bug eye and blob eye shape immensly, but they grow on you. I cant stand the standard bug eyes, but chrissy' and tiny' both look bloody brilliant.n again my choice.
just my 2 pence.
jamo
to make it look better perhaps?
been to the nbo today, and seen some great cars.
even people that have rb5, 22b and type r modify them. why?
because its their car and its their choice.
i used to dislike the bug eye and blob eye shape immensly, but they grow on you. I cant stand the standard bug eyes, but chrissy' and tiny' both look bloody brilliant.n again my choice.
just my 2 pence.
jamo