STi hatch, bad idea???
24 February 2017, 08:57 AM
#31
Scooby Regular
Ouch! Bet he was gutted about that. Too be honest I'm not worried about having my turbo changed, maybe to have it billet'd. But I wouldn't go to the extent that some people do when modifying cars.
24 February 2017, 08:59 AM
#32
i only bought a std 09 330s that had been forged 2014...too many horror stories. checking history before purchase and it turned it had also had an engine replacement in 2010
so if buying a std engine car, id budget for the forged build
they are a cracking car though - so much better than my previous hawk STI imo - so much road presence also
so if buying a std engine car, id budget for the forged build
they are a cracking car though - so much better than my previous hawk STI imo - so much road presence also
24 February 2017, 01:47 PM
#33
Scooby Regular
Had the car checked out by a specialist and full compression test done all ok so changed the plugs and all sorted now.
Running a cat back system (removed the secondary cat) so car is pritty much standard
24 February 2017, 03:33 PM
#35
I can't say whether or not the 2.5 is fragile, as I don't have enough experiences of it....but the comments in that article demonstrate nothing.
He mentions the compression ring being too high, then shows a picture of a piston with seizure marks and the top ring land still intact (and yes, I saw the second land was broken, but the article implied it was the top land that fails). That ringland failure looks like a result of a failure, not the cause of a failure.
He then talks about pump gas, overzealous tuning and 7500 rpm causing failures.......
Well, duh
no surprise there....
The 2.5 may or may not be fragile, but that article is a crock of ****.
(I am not having a go at you Trooper, I just hate these internet "expert" articles that are poorly cobbled together).
He mentions the compression ring being too high, then shows a picture of a piston with seizure marks and the top ring land still intact (and yes, I saw the second land was broken, but the article implied it was the top land that fails). That ringland failure looks like a result of a failure, not the cause of a failure.
He then talks about pump gas, overzealous tuning and 7500 rpm causing failures.......
Well, duh
no surprise there....The 2.5 may or may not be fragile, but that article is a crock of ****.
(I am not having a go at you Trooper, I just hate these internet "expert" articles that are poorly cobbled together).
does.
24 February 2017, 09:04 PM
#38
Scooby Regular
Well thought I would add my bit I have a STI hatch 2010 mapped to 370. Decat invida exhaust. All on standard inturnals. By the way 920000 miles. Loving it. !!!!!!!!!
24 February 2017, 11:01 PM
#41
Scooby Senior
had mine 6yrs now.. bought at two years old.. (touch wood) no issues either...... how a car is treated is one of the problems.. wrong fuel.. red line bouncing.. lack of proper servicing.. (like most cars really)
it's a great car and quick... looks good too.
24 February 2017, 11:07 PM
#42
Scooby Regular
especially with the Irish plate lol
24 February 2017, 11:17 PM
#43
Scooby Senior
24 February 2017, 11:25 PM
#44
Scooby Regular
24 February 2017, 11:34 PM
#45
Scooby Senior
25 February 2017, 08:34 AM
#48
Scooby Senior
its been on years now... car snow foamed and jet washed most weeks too.
25 February 2017, 08:11 PM
#50
Scooby Senior
which foam part?
25 February 2017, 08:29 PM
#51
Scooby Regular
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Leigh
Posts: 379
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
26 February 2017, 09:27 PM
#52
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: the blue half of manchester!
Posts: 219
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have noticed a 2011 saloon STI come up for reasonable money close to me, did these cars suffer the same engine issues? There is no mention of a rebuilt engine in the advertisement but it's nearby and possibly worth a look if they didn't suffer the same issues.