STi hatch, bad idea???
Hi all, been a couple of years since my last impreza, i have previously owned a bug WRX and a blob STi and i am currently contemplating buying a STi hatchback, i have read all the horror stories about the engines but i am after some genuine owners advice, are they that bad? i have seen a few for sale with 50-70k on the clock and from what i have read a lot of the engines went pop really early in the cars life, should i be concerned as i really don't want to have to fork out on rebuilding an engine soon after purchase, or is it just a case of finding a good one with history and looking after it correctly, i would have no plans to modify the car and it would be my weekend car only. Cheers for any input.
|
Try finding one that's had work done, removing any of that doubt and giving you peace of mind.
What's your budget? |
I would be looking at around 13.5k, i also looked at the WRX-S but would probably only end up wishing i had bought an STi.
|
As above look for one already forged or have a few pound set aside in case it needs a rebuild 13k will get you a decent hatch sti
Alternatively you could buy a jdm model which comes with 2lite engine but these are a lot more expensive to buy |
http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Subaru-Imp...EAAOSw3v5YnNDe
This one is 14.5k but might take less, decent spec. Fully forged. http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Subaru-Imp...MAAOSwB09YQLhe JDM i wonder how much it will sell for. http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/2-0-Subaru...0AAOSwB-1YqhkM Another forged one http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Subaru-Imp...oAAOSwt5hYd1hT The 2nd one at 14.5k I would have probably bought if it was up for sale when I bought my one. Great spec, you're spoilt for choice really. |
I had the same concerns going from my blob sti to hatch sti. I spent time looking and got a forged one all documented so I knew what parts had be used etc to give me some comfort. It's my daily drive and I love it, fuel consumption seems a lot worst than the blob but guess that's just part of it and if it's weekends only you won't even notice 👍🏻
|
Originally Posted by Wull
(Post 11921634)
http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Subaru-Imp...EAAOSw3v5YnNDe
This one is 14.5k but might take less, decent spec. Fully forged. http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Subaru-Imp...MAAOSwB09YQLhe JDM i wonder how much it will sell for. http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/2-0-Subaru...0AAOSwB-1YqhkM Another forged one http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Subaru-Imp...oAAOSwt5hYd1hT The 2nd one at 14.5k I would have probably bought if it was up for sale when I bought my one. Great spec, you're spoilt for choice really. |
Luck of the draw I guess. Some people have problems some have none at all. But I think most problems are due to a bad map or running to much through the engine without the supporting mods. It's not just Subaru's it happens to, mate has a skyline and a piston went on that. But I wouldn't worry too much if you are keeping it standard.
|
Try and find a JDM hatch, no engine issues.
|
Have to agree TRY and get a car with NO mods and low mileage ! I looked for months before buying as i was in the same boat as you.
Check with the dealers that the car has had all recalls done in case it was running with a bad map. Every subaru will look after you as long as you look after it. |
To true @big-kev. Good servicing decent oil etc will help you along the way definitely aswell. If you do go for a map, use someone with a good reputation. They are great cars when looked after properly.
|
Has Subaru ever commented about this mass issue?
|
Love my hatchback and the 2.5 is awesome once properly rebuilt
|
Originally Posted by ryan51
(Post 11921649)
First one has forged pistons.no mention of forged rods!
As for just having forged pistons that's a good start regarding the issues of ringland failure. |
I know we all fear that engine failure but is the 2.5 that bad of an engine ? or is it the usual give it a bad name and ****e sticks ?
Just outa curiosity how may hatch owners have had to get a rebuild ? Are the engines failing due to the owners pushing the car to hard or as mentioned modifications/servicing etc. I never liked the hatch or the 2.5 just because of the bad rep it had but i wasnt willing to pay 10k plus for a 10 to 12 yr old scooby so took a chance and bought a 2009 sti and i love it ! |
I'd be looking at something far more special for a weekend only car! A Scoob is fun but not an event! I'd probably put an MX5 in front of an Impreza for a weekend ride!
|
Originally Posted by big-kev
(Post 11921698)
I know we all fear that engine failure but is the 2.5 that bad of an engine ? or is it the usual give it a bad name and ****e sticks ?
Just outa curiosity how may hatch owners have had to get a rebuild ? Are the engines failing due to the owners pushing the car to hard or as mentioned modifications/servicing etc. I never liked the hatch or the 2.5 just because of the bad rep it had but i wasnt willing to pay 10k plus for a 10 to 12 yr old scooby so took a chance and bought a 2009 sti and i love it ! https://www.scoobynet.com/scoobynet-...-failures.html |
And the engineering reasons the 2.5 is not great.
http://www.motoiq.com/MagazineArticl...That-Suck.aspx |
Originally Posted by The Trooper 1815
(Post 11921701)
And the engineering reasons the 2.5 is not great.
http://www.motoiq.com/MagazineArticl...That-Suck.aspx He mentions the compression ring being too high, then shows a picture of a piston with seizure marks and the top ring land still intact (and yes, I saw the second land was broken, but the article implied it was the top land that fails). That ringland failure looks like a result of a failure, not the cause of a failure. He then talks about pump gas, overzealous tuning and 7500 rpm causing failures....... Well, duh :wonder: no surprise there.... The 2.5 may or may not be fragile, but that article is a crock of sh1t. (I am not having a go at you Trooper, I just hate these internet "expert" articles that are poorly cobbled together). |
Originally Posted by Brun
(Post 11921699)
I'd be looking at something far more special for a weekend only car! A Scoob is fun but not an event! I'd probably put an MX5 in front of an Impreza for a weekend ride!
|
Well...
TBH to spend 13k on a used Sti hatch is madness unless rebuilt. Having one from new and it failing at 16k no mods and never abused I speak from experience.
I personally think more than 40% of the early 2008-2010 hatches failed ... it was well past 20% (that's one in every five !) by 2010. It was a pandemic. Lovely cars but really s---e engines ... forged only unless you won't listen. And then not the 'drop in pistons' half fix - I'd want a complete forged build BUT these are only safe to400/420 bhp. More than that and it's only s matter of time. My expensive forged reputable build @450 lasted another 43k miles until the little ends spun a bearing and minced the whole engine. Fact is the 2.5 is not a good engine to play with. JDM is the best way to go. Sorry to rain in your parade. You'd get a nice Evo for that. Lol. |
Just out of interest did the '11' plates and later saloons suffer the same issues? I agree upon reading the comments that a rebuilt car would be the way to go.
|
I've got a hatch and I've got no record of mine having a problem (touch wood) and it's on 72,000.
its how how people treat them I think mate. |
Originally Posted by wrxben
(Post 11921729)
Just out of interest did the '11' plates and later saloons suffer the same issues? I agree upon reading the comments that a rebuilt car would be the way to go.
I think for the price of them you're as well going for a forged one. They seem to be around the 13-15k mark which is the price bracket mine was in as well. |
Originally Posted by Wull
(Post 11921731)
I think for the price of them you're as well going for a forged one. They seem to be around the 13-15k mark which is the price bracket mine was in as well.
|
Originally Posted by Matty81
(Post 11921730)
I've got a hatch and I've got no record of mine having a problem (touch wood) and it's on 72,000.
its how how people treat them I think mate. |
I do agree that if you can afford a rebuild it's a good way to go. My mate had to have his skyline forged because a piston went after the previous guy basically put mods on it without putting it in for a remap. Was your mates cars standard or was they heavily modified ?
|
Originally Posted by Matty81
(Post 11921730)
I've got a hatch and I've got no record of mine having a problem (touch wood) and it's on 72,000.
its how how people treat them I think mate. Unless you have had it from new or checked its history documentation details you cannot tell. I had one customers car in for a forged build & he said its never had any work done other than servicing, when checked properly it had had pistons 2 & 4 replaced at 16,000 miles, then at 31,000 it had had a replacement short engine all under its warranty, this was an early 08 car, which are the worst for failure, that said I have also had a couple of 2012's & a 2013 with failed ringlands at very low miles. |
Originally Posted by Matty81
(Post 11921739)
I do agree that if you can afford a rebuild it's a good way to go. My mate had to have his skyline forged because a piston went after the previous guy basically put mods on it without putting it in for a remap. Was your mates cars standard or was they heavily modified ?
|
Hmmm!. I can imagine they was glad to find out that 2 and 4 had been replaced in its early life, I would be if that happened to me too be honest. I'd definitely contemplate having forged pistons put in mine to be honest just to be safe.
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:23 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands