Notices
Projects For Serious DIY Car Projects

Why are all the quickest scoobs 2.33?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 29 September 2006, 12:22 PM
  #1  
johnwiz
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (26)
 
johnwiz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Stuck in the 70s, man.....
Posts: 1,423
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Why are all the quickest scoobs 2.33?

Excuse my ignorance & apologies if this has been done before but I notice all the quickest UK Scoobs are 2.33 litre (Basically a 2.2 block with a 2.5 litre US STI crank.) Is this the ideal bore /stroke combination?
Normally you cant beat cubes but people say the full 2.5 engine will not rev hence power output is limited?
In the bike world bores are becoming increasingly bigger & strokes shorter in the quest for revs, would this not work on a scoob engine?
Anyone recommend a good up to date book covering modifying turbo engines?
Cheers, John
Old 29 September 2006, 12:46 PM
  #2  
Scoobyslammed
Scooby Regular
 
Scoobyslammed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Cheshire
Posts: 1,919
Received 26 Likes on 8 Posts
Wink

Because its supposedly the strongest form of Impreza engine being a CDB...... and you've got near the torque of the 2.5... but also rev's well like the 2 litre...
Old 29 September 2006, 01:31 PM
  #3  
ZEN Performance
Former Sponsor
 
ZEN Performance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Wellingborough, Northamptonshire
Posts: 2,859
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Easiest and most reliable way to build a larger capacity engine that doesn't pop head gaskets. Expect more "quick" 2.5s as technology improves and becomes more accessable.
Old 01 October 2006, 05:29 PM
  #4  
911
Scooby Regular
 
911's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 11,341
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

And 2.33's are the most expensive to build?

If you spent as much as a 'good' 2.33 costs on a 2.5 base, what would the performance be like in comparison?

Lets say a 'good' 2.33 cost 10K fully dressed,(550 x 450?) then using the USA 2.5 as a starter and the same budget you would get...?

Graham
Old 01 October 2006, 07:50 PM
  #5  
ZEN Performance
Former Sponsor
 
ZEN Performance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Wellingborough, Northamptonshire
Posts: 2,859
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

IMHO you can build a 2.5 that works well, but I know as a matter of fact you can build 2.35 that works well.
Old 02 October 2006, 10:13 PM
  #6  
johnwiz
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (26)
 
johnwiz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Stuck in the 70s, man.....
Posts: 1,423
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Any tips on good books guys that cover things like maximum piston speeds using using up to date materials & technology,choosing turbos, etc?
Cheers John
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Shaun
Other Marques
33
26 October 2015 10:57 AM
Davalar
General Technical
19
30 September 2015 08:54 PM
Bean592
ICE
10
25 September 2015 01:03 PM
14500rpm
Suspension
15
18 September 2015 09:15 AM
WRX Blues
Was it you?
0
17 September 2015 12:52 PM



Quick Reply: Why are all the quickest scoobs 2.33?



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:47 AM.