Project "Less Lag"
I'm currently obsessed with the amount of lag my car has so I'm going to try some easy, cheap ways to reduce it.
Current spec:
MY93 WRX
Scoobysport full system from the turbo back
HKS SPF induction kit
Bosch MEC723 coils
ScoobyECU by Scott
Standard TD05 running at 15.5psi (1.07 bar)
Current boost levels: (all recorded in 4th gear, from 2000rpm on a closed throttle)
2500 - 0.3 bar
3000 - 0.5 bar
3500 - 0.75 bar
3800 - 1 bar
4200 - 1.1 bar
4400 - 1.07 bar held to redline
I'm now going to change from the standard boost solenoid to the Turbosmart MBC I was using previously.
Current spec:
MY93 WRX
Scoobysport full system from the turbo back
HKS SPF induction kit
Bosch MEC723 coils
ScoobyECU by Scott
Standard TD05 running at 15.5psi (1.07 bar)
Current boost levels: (all recorded in 4th gear, from 2000rpm on a closed throttle)
2500 - 0.3 bar
3000 - 0.5 bar
3500 - 0.75 bar
3800 - 1 bar
4200 - 1.1 bar
4400 - 1.07 bar held to redline
I'm now going to change from the standard boost solenoid to the Turbosmart MBC I was using previously.
Scooby Regular
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 15,239
Likes: 1
From: Leeds - It was 562.4bhp@28psi on Optimax, How much closer to 600 with race fuel and a bigger turbo?
Easy cheap ways.. hmm
Enable Antilag in the ecu.
Dawes or similar.
Smaller Turbo.
TD05 FE
A proper Map to really get it moving
Ported Headers.
Ported OEM up pipe or cheap up pipe.
David
Enable Antilag in the ecu.
Dawes or similar.
Smaller Turbo.
TD05 FE
A proper Map to really get it moving
Ported Headers.
Ported OEM up pipe or cheap up pipe.
David
The plan is:
Phase 1:
MBC (Turbosmart)
check the dump valve isn't leaking
check wastegate is working properly and spring preload is reasonable
Phase 2:
ported headers and uppipe (cheap, but not that easy)
exhaust wrap
Phase 3:
Getting beyond cheap and easy...
Phase 1:
MBC (Turbosmart)
check the dump valve isn't leaking
check wastegate is working properly and spring preload is reasonable
Phase 2:
ported headers and uppipe (cheap, but not that easy)
exhaust wrap
Phase 3:
Getting beyond cheap and easy...
Paul, thats what worries me, I've seen comments from others along the same lines. 3800rpm for 1 bar seems awfully high. Problem is, the car wasn't standard when I bought it, it came with a bleed valve so the piping had already been "interfered with" so I'm not sure whats standard and what isn't.
Zippy, cheap and cheerful mate, I'm tighter than a ducks ****.
A quick question, this could sound dumb
Should I be able to move the wastegate by hand, by moving the arm, relatively easily? Mine won't budge with "reasonable" force. Haven't tried unreasonable force yet.
Zippy, cheap and cheerful mate, I'm tighter than a ducks ****.
A quick question, this could sound dumb

Should I be able to move the wastegate by hand, by moving the arm, relatively easily? Mine won't budge with "reasonable" force. Haven't tried unreasonable force yet.
Trending Topics
OK, fitted and adjusted the Turbosmart MBC and the improvement is massive:
2500 - 0.3 bar
3000 - 0.55 bar
3200 - 1 bar
3500 - 1.07 bar held to redline
I'd had the MBC fitted previously and it had always felt fine, but recently I'd begun to notice the lag, which is when I reverted to the OEM boost solenoid.
The car now feels a lot faster and a lot torquier, which is great, in fact it feels better than it's ever done (placebo effect?) I had stripped and cleaned the MBC before refitting and used new vacuum tubing, which may have helped a little.
The wastegate actuator seems fine, and the OEM dump valve definately isn't leaking, so I guess it's onto the harder, more expensive things to try (ported headers/uppipe). I don't suppose anyone is doing these on an exchange basis, are they?
2500 - 0.3 bar
3000 - 0.55 bar
3200 - 1 bar
3500 - 1.07 bar held to redline
I'd had the MBC fitted previously and it had always felt fine, but recently I'd begun to notice the lag, which is when I reverted to the OEM boost solenoid.
The car now feels a lot faster and a lot torquier, which is great, in fact it feels better than it's ever done (placebo effect?) I had stripped and cleaned the MBC before refitting and used new vacuum tubing, which may have helped a little.
The wastegate actuator seems fine, and the OEM dump valve definately isn't leaking, so I guess it's onto the harder, more expensive things to try (ported headers/uppipe). I don't suppose anyone is doing these on an exchange basis, are they?

you could allways try nos,fit system as normal rig to wot switch and through pressure switch in manifold to cut at about 10psi,instant boost from tickover! is easy on nos too as wont take long to spin up.
Jon.
Jeez, who resurrected this? 
NOS would work, but I really can't be bothered, I quite like to the way it runs with the Turbosmart MBC fitted (which is basically a purple anodised Dawes device
)
In fact, on all the ice that was around on the local untreated roads at 6am this morning, it spolled up a bit too quick

NOS would work, but I really can't be bothered, I quite like to the way it runs with the Turbosmart MBC fitted (which is basically a purple anodised Dawes device
)In fact, on all the ice that was around on the local untreated roads at 6am this morning, it spolled up a bit too quick
Not me mate!
Evenin' Dave!
Which of the above mods / suggestions did you eventually do?
Exchange ported ( and wrapped ) headers are common now about £100 exchange ( Harvey, Jim Litten etc ).
Merry xmas!
Evenin' Dave!
Which of the above mods / suggestions did you eventually do?
Exchange ported ( and wrapped ) headers are common now about £100 exchange ( Harvey, Jim Litten etc ).
Merry xmas!
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 11,479
Likes: 27
From: MY99UK-MY02STi-MY99Type R-MY06 T20-MY11 340R-MY05 TYPE25
Doesn't a Top Mount Intercooler give fairly good results bar from heatsoak
a FMIC will give better result's during 'Medium & High' speeds but due to lenth of Inlet and Exhaust pipework Lag is also increased
Wouln't it be better to reposistion the Turbo towards the front of engine reverse both inlet and Exhaust manifolds and fit a FMIC
this would drasticaly reduce the lenth's pipework and 'Lag' yet increasing the effieciency of induction cooling 
Tony
IMHO
Tony
a FMIC will give better result's during 'Medium & High' speeds but due to lenth of Inlet and Exhaust pipework Lag is also increased

Wouln't it be better to reposistion the Turbo towards the front of engine reverse both inlet and Exhaust manifolds and fit a FMIC
this would drasticaly reduce the lenth's pipework and 'Lag' yet increasing the effieciency of induction cooling 
Tony
IMHO
Tony
Scooby Regular
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 15,239
Likes: 1
From: Leeds - It was 562.4bhp@28psi on Optimax, How much closer to 600 with race fuel and a bigger turbo?
you would need to remove the radiator.. and make some special headers.. funnily enough I have some exhaust flanges in the garage for just this..
David
David
You could try tightening the actuator rod a little to take up any slack.
My MY 95 UK saloon hits 1bar at 2850 rpm and 1.25bar at 3100ish.
Std TD05
K&N Panel filter
Revolution 3" decat DP and system
MAF de-grilled
MRT inlet plenum pipe
Walbro and FSE reg
Apexi PFC
My MY 95 UK saloon hits 1bar at 2850 rpm and 1.25bar at 3100ish.
Std TD05
K&N Panel filter
Revolution 3" decat DP and system
MAF de-grilled
MRT inlet plenum pipe
Walbro and FSE reg
Apexi PFC
The NOS idea is ok if used from 2500rpm on WOT then kicked out by a pressure switch as mentioned to blend NOS/Boost. Still not got mine fitted yet, but its in the pipeline. 15 shot is enough for this.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
12
Nov 18, 2015 07:03 AM
Phil3822
General Technical
0
Sep 30, 2015 06:29 PM








