LPG is it really a cost saver?
#1
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 12,329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
LPG is it really a cost saver?
Looking at some bigger 4x4's
Lots of V8's from the landrover stable going with LPG conversions
Question is are they viable, or are you still paying big fuel bills even with LPG
I did a quick calc on paper,
Petrol on a 90 litre tank returns approx 432 miles £120
LPG at 70L would return 264
so effectively I'd need 2x fills of LPG to achieve 528 miles £103
and after 4.5 fill's id be on a free 70L
Now that's on paper, what are they like in the real world
Or do the savings get mullerd?
Mart
Lots of V8's from the landrover stable going with LPG conversions
Question is are they viable, or are you still paying big fuel bills even with LPG
I did a quick calc on paper,
Petrol on a 90 litre tank returns approx 432 miles £120
LPG at 70L would return 264
so effectively I'd need 2x fills of LPG to achieve 528 miles £103
and after 4.5 fill's id be on a free 70L
Now that's on paper, what are they like in the real world
Or do the savings get mullerd?
Mart
#3
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (7)
I think you need to do your sums again, it wouldn't take 4.5 fills.
Over 2 fills you save £34 and do 190 miles more. so after 4 fills you have done 380 miles more plus you saved £68 so then you get your free fill plus your 380 miles, and £17 change.
I think.
Over 2 fills you save £34 and do 190 miles more. so after 4 fills you have done 380 miles more plus you saved £68 so then you get your free fill plus your 380 miles, and £17 change.
I think.
Last edited by ditchmyster; 21 January 2014 at 06:13 PM.
#4
Scooby Regular
i had a 4.2ltr Range Rover - converted in 2001, and ran it on LPG for 6 years
problably went thru less than £100 worth of petrol in all that time - saved me an absolute fortune (its started and ran on LPG 100% of the time)
but I had a masshoosive 120ltr tank in the boot - and on a cool day could get over a 100tlrs in the fvcker
this gave a decent range
fuel consumption was slighlty less (10% or so)
my brother has self converted all his cars apart from his WRX (about 7 in total) and makes very good savings currently he runs a 3.9 V8 Disco
problably went thru less than £100 worth of petrol in all that time - saved me an absolute fortune (its started and ran on LPG 100% of the time)
but I had a masshoosive 120ltr tank in the boot - and on a cool day could get over a 100tlrs in the fvcker
this gave a decent range
fuel consumption was slighlty less (10% or so)
my brother has self converted all his cars apart from his WRX (about 7 in total) and makes very good savings currently he runs a 3.9 V8 Disco
#5
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 12,329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i had a 4.2ltr Range Rover - converted in 2001, and ran it on LPG for 6 years
problably went thru less than £100 worth of petrol in all that time - saved me an absolute fortune (its started and ran on LPG 100% of the time)
but I had a masshoosive 120ltr tank in the boot - and on a cool day could get over a 100tlrs in the fvcker
this gave a decent range
fuel consumption was slighlty less (10% or so)
my brother has self converted all his cars apart from his WRX (about 7 in total) and makes very good savings currently he runs a 3.9 V8 Disco
problably went thru less than £100 worth of petrol in all that time - saved me an absolute fortune (its started and ran on LPG 100% of the time)
but I had a masshoosive 120ltr tank in the boot - and on a cool day could get over a 100tlrs in the fvcker
this gave a decent range
fuel consumption was slighlty less (10% or so)
my brother has self converted all his cars apart from his WRX (about 7 in total) and makes very good savings currently he runs a 3.9 V8 Disco
Thats what i was looking at , what MPG does he get from the LPG?
Mart
#6
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (5)
I'm seriously considering converting my BMW 530i as well..
I'm getting absolutely mullered by fuel costs at the moment, getting about 200 miles for 80-85 pound fill up, depending on what the forecourt cost is at any given day. At 1000 miles per month, my wallet is hurting.
It seems as if LPG makes sense on cars with large petrol engines. I wouldn't bother if it wasn't a large petrol engined car I liked and intended to run for a while - I've seen conversions done on things like astra's, and you'd need to do astronomical mileage for them to make sense.
LPG on my BMW would mean the difference between being able to keep it, realistically, or selling up and getting something different.
I'm getting absolutely mullered by fuel costs at the moment, getting about 200 miles for 80-85 pound fill up, depending on what the forecourt cost is at any given day. At 1000 miles per month, my wallet is hurting.
It seems as if LPG makes sense on cars with large petrol engines. I wouldn't bother if it wasn't a large petrol engined car I liked and intended to run for a while - I've seen conversions done on things like astra's, and you'd need to do astronomical mileage for them to make sense.
LPG on my BMW would mean the difference between being able to keep it, realistically, or selling up and getting something different.
Trending Topics
#9
Scooby Regular
I ran an 80 series Landcruiser auto 4.5 petrol which had been converted with a 90 litre under slung tank. It roughly did around 15 mpg and at the time LPG was around half the cost of unleaded so in real world figures/money costs it was doing 30mpg. Compared to the 4.2 diesel Landcruiser that do no more than 20 - 22 mpg on more expensive diesel it worked out in my favour but only due to the fact that the previous owner had bore the cost! People say you loose power on LPG but I didn't notice any loss, the only drawbacks are finding LPG filling stations and the actual time they take to fill the tanks. If you register you have converted to LPG you are congestion charge exempt!
#10
Scooby Regular
he gets roughly 150 miles to £50 woth of LPG
he lives in London so that does include a bit of town driving - which kills consumption
and as someone who ran a 4.2 V8 on LPG for 6 odd years - I totally concur with Henrik
it just takes some of the pain away - on a day to day basis (and quite nice driving it with a fuel gauge that does not visibly move when you are doing 75 on the mway
he lives in London so that does include a bit of town driving - which kills consumption
and as someone who ran a 4.2 V8 on LPG for 6 odd years - I totally concur with Henrik
it just takes some of the pain away - on a day to day basis (and quite nice driving it with a fuel gauge that does not visibly move when you are doing 75 on the mway
Last edited by hodgy0_2; 22 January 2014 at 03:25 PM.
#11
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 12,329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
he gets roughly 150 miles to £50 woth of LPG
he lives in London so that does include a bit of town driving - which kills consumption
and as someone who ran a 4.2 V8 on LPG for 6 odd years - I totally concur with Henrik
it just takes some of the pain away - on a day to day basis (and quite nice driving it with a fuel gauge that does not visibly move when you are doing 75 on the mway
he lives in London so that does include a bit of town driving - which kills consumption
and as someone who ran a 4.2 V8 on LPG for 6 odd years - I totally concur with Henrik
it just takes some of the pain away - on a day to day basis (and quite nice driving it with a fuel gauge that does not visibly move when you are doing 75 on the mway
Weekends & trips out...
Typical, the one i had my eye on has gone, so now to keep looking,
Seen another, nut its a slightly lower spec, and i think it's single point injection (which he states is the best one lol ...(dont you just love ads!))
or look at a diesel
Mart
#13
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 12,329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#14
Scooby Regular
Similiar to my brothers - make sure you check for the "three amigos"
Very common problem and can be masked by removing the bulbs
https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=di...&client=safari
Such a shame they did not fit the mechanical diff lock, I believe the mechanism is in the transfer box - just no way to engage it
Also check for the Porous block syndrome - I am not sure whether it effects the 3.9, it certainly effects the 4.0 4.2 and 4.6 - classic sign is the rock hard upper radiator hose when engine up to temp
Very common problem and can be masked by removing the bulbs
https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=di...&client=safari
Such a shame they did not fit the mechanical diff lock, I believe the mechanism is in the transfer box - just no way to engage it
Also check for the Porous block syndrome - I am not sure whether it effects the 3.9, it certainly effects the 4.0 4.2 and 4.6 - classic sign is the rock hard upper radiator hose when engine up to temp
#15
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 12,329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Similiar to my brothers - make sure you check for the "three amigos"
Very common problem and can be masked by removing the bulbs
https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=di...&client=safari
Such a shame they did not fit the mechanical diff lock, I believe the mechanism is in the transfer box - just no way to engage it
Also check for the Porous block syndrome - I am not sure whether it effects the 3.9, it certainly effects the 4.0 4.2 and 4.6 - classic sign is the rock hard upper radiator hose when engine up to temp
Very common problem and can be masked by removing the bulbs
https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=di...&client=safari
Such a shame they did not fit the mechanical diff lock, I believe the mechanism is in the transfer box - just no way to engage it
Also check for the Porous block syndrome - I am not sure whether it effects the 3.9, it certainly effects the 4.0 4.2 and 4.6 - classic sign is the rock hard upper radiator hose when engine up to temp
Allready aware of the 3 fellows lol ....
Cheers for the heads up on the porus block, will remember that if i look
Mart
#16
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: In RS land......
Posts: 12,902
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I ran an 80 series Landcruiser auto 4.5 petrol which had been converted with a 90 litre under slung tank. It roughly did around 15 mpg and at the time LPG was around half the cost of unleaded so in real world figures/money costs it was doing 30mpg. Compared to the 4.2 diesel Landcruiser that do no more than 20 - 22 mpg on more expensive diesel it worked out in my favour but only due to the fact that the previous owner had bore the cost! People say you loose power on LPG but I didn't notice any loss, the only drawbacks are finding LPG filling stations and the actual time they take to fill the tanks. If you register you have converted to LPG you are congestion charge exempt!
#17
Scooby Regular
Doesn't really surprise me. Running LPG used to be a viable proposition but like all good things the Government catch on and take away any benefits
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
28
28 December 2015 11:07 PM
shorty87
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
19
22 December 2015 11:59 AM
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
12
18 November 2015 07:03 AM