2014 bmw m3
#1
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Trending Topics
#10
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Mars
Posts: 11,470
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
A huge jump in torque and 4.1s to 60 is properly quick.
However my £56k would probably go on a lightly used 911 (one that doesn't break down). It would be an R8 but I need some sort of back seats.
Will have to test one if possible at some stage!
However my £56k would probably go on a lightly used 911 (one that doesn't break down). It would be an R8 but I need some sort of back seats.
Will have to test one if possible at some stage!
#13
Scooby Regular
£56k new is too expensive.
£30k secondhand and run in by a sensible owner makes it a far more appealing purchase.
But what will you be able to pick up an E92 for after this car has been out six months?
£30k secondhand and run in by a sensible owner makes it a far more appealing purchase.
But what will you be able to pick up an E92 for after this car has been out six months?
#18
Scooby Regular
It is without doubt a lot of money but tell me another car you can buy new with 430 BHP, 400 torques, quality engineering and interior for less.
A 991 with similar power once specced lightly will approach £90k. Now I know a 991 is more 'special' than what some may regard as a pimped up 3 series but perhaps you get my point.
#19
Scooby Regular
Have things changed recently? BMW would be my choice of car but their cars of late have been built so poorly that I had been put off.
#20
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Mars
Posts: 11,470
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#21
Scooby Regular
My F10 5 series is seriously well put together, quality german engineering at its best. It's boring to drive, poorly resolved suspension, vague steering etc but you can't fault the build quality at all.
#22
4wd will make it more boring to drive and heavier. The m3 was 'supposed' to be a purists car with its RWD and nasp engine, of course now they have forced induction to keep up with the power arms race so middle aged guys in the pub can boast , they retain the RWD of course (for now). The 1 series M car is probably more like on old M3 in spirit.
#25
Scooby Regular
4wd will make it more boring to drive and heavier. The m3 was 'supposed' to be a purists car with its RWD and nasp engine, of course now they have forced induction to keep up with the power arms race so middle aged guys in the pub can boast , they retain the RWD of course (for now). The 1 series M car is probably more like on old M3 in spirit.
Not at all, but a common response that endless idiots on Pistonheads (and the like) continually copy and paste. Usually those people have never owned and will probably never own these cars (not brand new anyway)
Forced induction has been used to increase mpg and decrease co2 rather than a power arms race. Amg got 500 bhp out of the 63 engine but are still going over to FI for that reason.
4wd does not always mean more boring to drive. Read the reviews of the new e63amg 4wd and you'll see most prefer it to 2wd. Similarly read the reviews of the 991 c4s and it is likewise. Potential weight gain from the 4wd can be offset from weight savings elsewhere.
#26
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (16)
M3 saloon or M4 coupe??
Think it would have to be the M4 for me!!
http://www.carmagazine.co.uk/News/Se...cial-pictures/
Think it would have to be the M4 for me!!
http://www.carmagazine.co.uk/News/Se...cial-pictures/
#28
Not at all, but a common response that endless idiots on Pistonheads (and the like) continually copy and paste. Usually those people have never owned and will probably never own these cars (not brand new anyway)
Forced induction has been used to increase mpg and decrease co2 rather than a power arms race. Amg got 500 bhp out of the 63 engine but are still going over to FI for that reason.
4wd does not always mean more boring to drive. Read the reviews of the new e63amg 4wd and you'll see most prefer it to 2wd. Similarly read the reviews of the 991 c4s and it is likewise. Potential weight gain from the 4wd can be offset from weight savings elsewhere.
Forced induction has been used to increase mpg and decrease co2 rather than a power arms race. Amg got 500 bhp out of the 63 engine but are still going over to FI for that reason.
4wd does not always mean more boring to drive. Read the reviews of the new e63amg 4wd and you'll see most prefer it to 2wd. Similarly read the reviews of the 991 c4s and it is likewise. Potential weight gain from the 4wd can be offset from weight savings elsewhere.
I know what you mean, that FI allows to run a smaller displacement motor and still get big displacement power. It IS related to the power arms race in a sense, and yes when you start putting 6.3 litre V8's in cars they really do benefit from AWD. But I question the point of it all. I would really liked to have seen BMW keep a nasp engine and make it rev to like 10 grand or something to get as much power as possible, but then that costs a lot to do.
#29
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Mars
Posts: 11,470
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The most exciting thing about these is the big weight saving; the last two M3s have been incredibly heavy!
And a good dollop of torque will be a boon too.
Powerful NA engines are just too thirsty; I suspect none will exist within five years.
Regarding AWD; I have no interest in it in a BM or Merc.
And a good dollop of torque will be a boon too.
Powerful NA engines are just too thirsty; I suspect none will exist within five years.
Regarding AWD; I have no interest in it in a BM or Merc.
Last edited by Matteeboy; 14 December 2013 at 08:42 AM.