Notices
Other Marques Non-Subaru Vehicles

How quick are the older Civic Type R's really?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11 March 2009, 01:04 PM
  #1  
simog
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
simog's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Milton Keynes
Posts: 542
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default How quick are the older Civic Type R's really?

Hi all,

general wondering, I was followed by one of these things (not the newest one but a generation back before the redesigned shell) and it seems exceptionally quick to me.

I was suprised to see that he was sticking with me on straights from 0-60 which I didn't expect.

I should be pushing approx 270 - 280 with the mods and remap.

This must surely be down to my driving skills now!!!!

of course this is based on his car being standard!!
Old 11 March 2009, 01:12 PM
  #2  
phillyctr
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
phillyctr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

ek9 ctr is a 1.6 185hp standard,i doubt it would have been standard to keep with you,do u notice a fmic?if not may have been supercharged,pretty quick out of the box,but with a turbo kit or supercharged they will easliy keep with a scooby.
Old 11 March 2009, 01:13 PM
  #3  
gpssti4
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (6)
 
gpssti4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Deepest Darkest Kernow
Posts: 4,404
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

They're very quick once in the Vtec zone. They also handle much better than a (standard) Scoob. You're probably loosing 20bhp more through the 4x4 system, so 200bhp v 220 bhp at the wheels and the Civic will be lighter - not much in it really.
Old 11 March 2009, 01:15 PM
  #4  
urban
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
urban's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Never you mind
Posts: 12,566
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

You should see how good they take off with a young buck behind the wheel on a damp road.

Traffic light GP style.
Old 11 March 2009, 02:02 PM
  #5  
simog
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
simog's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Milton Keynes
Posts: 542
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Ok so it could have been a supercharged one then. I didn't see a front mount, to be honest it looked standard but then I don't know how into modding the looks of these cars the owners really are. Perhaps a sleeper?!

Nice little car though.
Old 11 March 2009, 03:37 PM
  #6  
MelTypeR
Scooby Regular
Support Scoobynet!
iTrader: (4)
 
MelTypeR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Hertfordshire
Posts: 876
Received 15 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

Theres one knocking around my area and its also very quick.

You'll be surprised how quick they are

0-60mph :5.7 seconds0-100mph:17.5 seconds0-1/4mi 15.0 seconds at 94mph

Honda EK9 Civic Type R Length / Width / Height (mm)4185 / 1695 /1360Minimum Ground Clearance (mm)135Curb weight (kg) 1090Displacement (cc)1595Horsepower (PS/rpm)185 / 8200 Torque (KGM/rpm) 16.3 /7500

so as you can see not bad for a front wheel drive car!!


Mel
Old 11 March 2009, 03:45 PM
  #7  
ALi-B
Moderator
Support Scoobynet!
iTrader: (1)
 
ALi-B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: The hell where youth and laughter go
Posts: 38,034
Received 301 Likes on 240 Posts
Default

Quickish: My Slusho-matic Shed kept up with one, who was "really" trying, and that by all means is not a quick car off the mark. CTR should have wiped the floor with it.
Old 11 March 2009, 04:12 PM
  #8  
simog
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
simog's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Milton Keynes
Posts: 542
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

This one was defo quick, will have to watch out for him again. Don't think I will miss him though...he will be the type R right up my backside!!

I hate being tail gated!
Old 11 March 2009, 04:21 PM
  #9  
LG John
Scooby Regular
 
LG John's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Bradford
Posts: 13,720
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

A supercharged civic would be passing a 280bhp scooby.
Old 11 March 2009, 04:51 PM
  #10  
simog
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
simog's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Milton Keynes
Posts: 542
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I don't doubt it.
Old 11 March 2009, 04:56 PM
  #11  
f1_fan
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (9)
 
f1_fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: .
Posts: 20,035
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

What generation are we talking about here? Not the current 'Flash Gordon' model, the one before - the breadvan model?

If so I have one and it is pretty quick. If you keep it in the VTEC zone and drive the wheels off it it will keep up with a standard Scoob, but it does all feel a bit frantic.
Old 11 March 2009, 05:08 PM
  #12  
talizman
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
talizman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 5,947
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by f1_fan
What generation are we talking about here? Not the current 'Flash Gordon' model, the one before - the breadvan model?

If so I have one and it is pretty quick. If you keep it in the VTEC zone and drive the wheels off it it will keep up with a standard Scoob, but it does all feel a bit frantic.
I assume the opening poster was referring to the 2001-2006 model, (the breadvan!) but most replys have confused it with the old EK9 1.6 litre 185bhp variant.

A few years ago I struggled to create much of a gap in my MY03 STi PPP from a 52 plate standard looking CTR. Not sure what he had done to it but it was a quick car.
Old 11 March 2009, 06:58 PM
  #13  
dj219957
Scooby Regular
 
dj219957's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Staffs
Posts: 3,708
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

i had a 03 plate ctr. i didnt think it was that quick. i feel that my classic is quicker.
The problem with the ctr is that you have to screem it (obviously) and when ever you wanted to speed off you were always in the wrong gear.
Old 11 March 2009, 07:34 PM
  #14  
billythekid
Scooby Regular
 
billythekid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,574
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

1200kgs, 200bhp, FWD, reasonable Cd, it should keep up tbh.

The other thing is off the line, if you know how to launch it - they will fly. They are not quite 4x4 quick, but not far off. If you plant the throttle with the car in 1st the second limiter should kick in, just dump the clutch from this point as quick as you can and off you go. (in the dry!)

I had one for about 2 years, very capable cars. Manly due to the kerb weight.
Old 12 March 2009, 01:39 AM
  #15  
The Chief
Scooby Regular
 
The Chief's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: There is only one God - Elvis!
Posts: 8,328
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I had a bit of fun with one in my Scoob which was pushing 260bhp, from a standing start i panned it (awd traction etc) but was quite shocked to see 200 yards later he was only a couple of car lengths behind me.

I thought they were slow - i was wrong.

The truth is on the road you need at least 100bhp difference to make a big difference on the road. Going back to my Scoob only super quick cars used to pull away up to sane speeds, i.e. M5's, 911s' etc and even then not by a massive amount - its only when speeds get silly and naughty these cars really make their presence felt. (which i never found out above 70mph)
Old 12 March 2009, 02:12 AM
  #16  
Eternal Rage
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (7)
 
Eternal Rage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Manchester
Posts: 542
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

A few guys have them up here, and tbh they are relaly quite pokey for what they are. As said, 200 BHP without the 4WD transmission loss and nice long gearing will make it a nuisance for most Scoobs in the mid 200BHP range.

The way its driven is gonna make all the difference too tho... ie warm and kept in V-Tec... plus as they have less torque than... well... everything else on the road... even one passenger will make a massive difference and slow it down a lot.

Just my tuppence
Old 12 March 2009, 09:52 AM
  #17  
phillyctr
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
phillyctr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

my ep3 was pushing around 240hp,i had a play with a white scoob type-r,he was suprised to still see me in the rearview mirror,great cars even better on the track, a mate of mine used to race his for cpl racing and was doing the quarter in under 12 secs,not bad for a fwd motor.
Old 12 March 2009, 01:04 PM
  #18  
f1_fan
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (9)
 
f1_fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: .
Posts: 20,035
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dj219957
i had a 03 plate ctr. i didnt think it was that quick. i feel that my classic is quicker.
I have a classic and a CTR and yes the classic feels quicker, but it isn't.

It will be though
Old 12 March 2009, 01:32 PM
  #19  
Andy M3
Scooby Regular
 
Andy M3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Chesterfield
Posts: 2,939
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Love these thread's
Old 12 March 2009, 01:45 PM
  #20  
nisr227
Scooby Regular
 
nisr227's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: CTR EP3 & MX5mk2 letstorquebhp.com
Posts: 437
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

OK they are not amazingly fast (I use to have a 350bhp Pulsar and use to eat them) but having said that, they are quicker than many other hatches.

Autocar timed the Ep3 (breadvan) Civic type R, 197bhp 1203kg....
0-60 6.7secs
0-100 16.2secs
Thats 60-100 in 9.5secs.

Compare that with the new Civic Type R (FN2 euro, not the jdm version) and they got..
0-60 7.4ses
0-100 in 18.4secs
Thats 60-100 in 11secs.

On another note, they timed the lastest basic 291bhp evo X at 0-60 in 5.7, 0-100 in 14.3secs i.e. 60-100 in 8.6secs, and thats not much quicker in the real world than the 9.5secs of the EP3 Civic, bit different on the corners though. Modern cars are much heavier, even cars like the revy n/a clio 197 might look small with decent power but they are far heavier than the EP3 which was doing it years ago.

So as an old age hot hatch, even as standard the EP3 is still a pretty quick car for what it is. A supercharger will obviously make it fly with anything from 280-400bhp, or a turbo, but companies like CPL have done a lot of NA testing on Type R's with fantastic results for much smaller outlay and costs, and that will take a second or so off the 0-100/60-100 times, and certainly get it a bit closer to certain scoobs.

You can get 235bhp-240bhp NA (depending on what dyno you believe) for about £1.5k. Get a geometry change (big difference to the handling with more lift off oversteer), decent pads (FS2500's) and maybe a spare set of wheels with R888's for the summer, and you'll have a pretty good 200bhp per ton package, more than enough for a fwd hatch. More Supension or coilovers if you don't mind really hard rides.

I am certainly thinking of getting one as I need a practical car for my dogs in the back, but something thats faily quick, fun, very reliable, used everday, and keeps costs down in the current economic climate. I love the way they want to be thrashed so hard but take it all anyway. I am sure they can be tiresome after a long while, and its easy to be in the wrong gear, but for short hard driven bursts along my local Welsh twisitie roads (in the dry) it will be a joy. Some people love vtecs, some just hate them.

And becuase they are common, there are loads of examples for sale, so better chance of bagging yourself a great example at a great price at the moment.

Last edited by nisr227; 12 March 2009 at 06:51 PM.
Old 12 March 2009, 01:52 PM
  #21  
P1Fanatic
Scooby Regular
 
P1Fanatic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Arborfield, Berkshire
Posts: 12,387
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I had a tussle with an EP3 (breadvan shape) in my '00 classic and could not make any ground on him. No great suprise when you run through the stats tho.

Incredibly capable car and as for the lack of torque - yes compared to a turbo'd car but for N/A its very good.

Ive pretty much decided on the newer FN2 model as my next car. A bit more refined and slighter slower but hey that suits me fine.

Simon
Old 12 March 2009, 06:49 PM
  #22  
SPIDERWRX
Scooby Regular
 
SPIDERWRX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: 335i LAND
Posts: 318
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I was putting fuel in my baby wrx (at the shell in derby) by markeaton park. with a mate in his mk4 1.8T revo to 220bhp. and a CTR came in to refuel, he laugh at my baby wrx as he left.. (thinking is the slow fat scooby). on the way back to b-ham on the A38 i saw him doing about 65mph , i was doing 75mph & overtook him... then he try to bait me, coming right behind me, & wanted to overtake me so in to 3rd gear and bye bye CTR, (but i do have 340bhp) my mate then wanted a play, in his mk4 1.8T nothing in it until about *35 and the CTR pulled a car lenght in head..

i love having one off the slow scooby

when the hot-hatchs come to play
Old 12 March 2009, 07:19 PM
  #23  
jreedy27
Scooby Newbie
 
jreedy27's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: sheffield
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

following on from what nisr227 said about the ep3 i have to agree he's spot on as my car recently pulled 234.4 bhp on tdi norths dyno after mapping and it was weighed at a friends garage at 1160kg. (A stnd type r ep3 weighs 1185 w/o air con or 1205 with) so the power to weight will be around 200bhp per ton which isn't to bad for a hatch back, my mods so far are k.pro, dc sports 4 2 1 manifold, spoon b.pipe spoon n1 b/box and a gruppe m induction kit. Also ive stripped out the rear of the spare tyre jack carpet parcel shelf etc and added some team dynamic pro race 1.2s light weigh wheels to save a bit of weight. (k.pro lowers the vtec point to 4.500rpm's and raises it to 9,000rpm's by the way folks)

This month i'll be lowering it by 30mm and getting the tdi north fast road set up just to give it that more planted feel, And then i was going to supercharge it and add an lsd in june time, however i've now decided to sell up in june and get me some 4 wheel drive turbo power after falling in love with my friend bellamy's scoobie wrx sti (think it's a pro drive?) Dont get me wrong i love my ep3 to bits and once rolling it will not be to far behind a wrx sti and sticks to the road well, it's just i fancy a change soon so i'll be wanting a scoobie or evo next and preferably one withsome tasty mods already done to it. That's why in loitering on here to get a tatse of the world of scoobies and i like what i see
Old 12 March 2009, 07:22 PM
  #24  
nisr227
Scooby Regular
 
nisr227's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: CTR EP3 & MX5mk2 letstorquebhp.com
Posts: 437
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

..becuase they are top selling hot hatches and very popular you do have a higher chance of coming across c**ky idiots who think their cars are it (bit like some scoob owners), and then again you will also get a lot of responsible drivers too, with decent clubs like Hondas on Track that you can get involved in.

As I said, if you've got alot more power (like my previous 350bhp) you will be obviously quicker, big deal, but then you can always come across a supercharged one with the same power and then see what happens. I am sure there are loads of storys against them.

CTRs are all about having thrashing fun keeping it all in the vtec zone along a demanding road, with the best reliability and cheap running costs, not just straightline speed for a fwd hatch.
Old 12 March 2009, 07:23 PM
  #25  
jonny_693
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (5)
 
jonny_693's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Hudds
Posts: 1,788
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

What?
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
KAS35RSTI
Subaru
27
04 November 2021 07:12 PM
scoobhunter722
ScoobyNet General
52
20 October 2015 04:32 PM
makkink
General Technical
10
01 October 2015 05:41 PM
Benrowe727
ScoobyNet General
7
28 September 2015 07:05 AM
M4RKG
Wanted
4
25 September 2015 09:54 PM



Quick Reply: How quick are the older Civic Type R's really?



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:51 AM.