BMW 1 series coupe - Imagine if they build an M powered one
#1
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Secretly saving for another Blobeye STI. Crystal Grey. Widetrack
Posts: 1,985
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
BMW 1 series coupe - Imagine if they build an M powered one
Looking at the size and shape of the car I'm imagining it powered by M.
I can't help but think it would be in some way like the old E30 original. Perfect poise as its almost the perfect shape.
I know it will never happen but I'm also imagining it quatro'ed. That would be nice but an M powered pure back wheel drive would be desirable.
I can't help but think it would be in some way like the old E30 original. Perfect poise as its almost the perfect shape.
I know it will never happen but I'm also imagining it quatro'ed. That would be nice but an M powered pure back wheel drive would be desirable.
#3
BANNED
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Your home is worthless.You can't afford to run your car.Your job is on the line.Schadenfreude rules.
Posts: 4,787
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Wouldn't be a true M car if it was 4WD.
To build something rivalling the E30 this would be my recipe based on the 1 series coupe.
Weight reduction program ie no rear seats, less airbags, lighter seats, bonnet, roof, glass, less electrics, no air con, less sound deadening etc. Trick M Diff and a high revving 4 cylinder light twin turbo charged, blueprinted and balanced 2.0/2.2 4 cyl petrol engine. Times have moved on since the E30 and a 280-300bhp 2ltr turbo would be light enough to fit the ethos of the car and still keep electric throttle response with the twin setup.
BMW would never build a car like that so I guess I can dream on.
To build something rivalling the E30 this would be my recipe based on the 1 series coupe.
Weight reduction program ie no rear seats, less airbags, lighter seats, bonnet, roof, glass, less electrics, no air con, less sound deadening etc. Trick M Diff and a high revving 4 cylinder light twin turbo charged, blueprinted and balanced 2.0/2.2 4 cyl petrol engine. Times have moved on since the E30 and a 280-300bhp 2ltr turbo would be light enough to fit the ethos of the car and still keep electric throttle response with the twin setup.
BMW would never build a car like that so I guess I can dream on.
Last edited by NACRO; 23 November 2007 at 01:15 PM.
#6
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Secretly saving for another Blobeye STI. Crystal Grey. Widetrack
Posts: 1,985
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
A tii is a good idea aswell.
I agree though that true M powered are back wheel drive.
A soon as I saw it I immediately thought of the E30 and the M
I agree though that true M powered are back wheel drive.
A soon as I saw it I immediately thought of the E30 and the M
#7
BANNED
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Your home is worthless.You can't afford to run your car.Your job is on the line.Schadenfreude rules.
Posts: 4,787
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Looks like a step in the right direction to me- can't see them making it though and if they did it shouldn't have a 6 cyl engine to be an E30 M3 rival. A screaming 4 pot is what's needed.
Trending Topics
#8
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Secretly saving for another Blobeye STI. Crystal Grey. Widetrack
Posts: 1,985
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I guess you're right. it would probably need to go back to a four pot. But the growl of a six pot is nice
#9
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: same time, different place
Posts: 11,313
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
2 Posts
I don't see how they could have a 4-pot M when there is already a 6-pot (turbo'd?) 135? M has to be the market leader, the 6 would trounce it for hairy chested power output, esp if chipped.
I said when the 1 hatch came out that it was reminiscent of the Z3M coupe. When they released the 3-door, it was a bit better still.
I said when the 1 hatch came out that it was reminiscent of the Z3M coupe. When they released the 3-door, it was a bit better still.
#10
BANNED
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Your home is worthless.You can't afford to run your car.Your job is on the line.Schadenfreude rules.
Posts: 4,787
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I don't see how they could have a 4-pot M when there is already a 6-pot (turbo'd?) 135? M has to be the market leader, the 6 would trounce it for hairy chested power output, esp if chipped.
I said when the 1 hatch came out that it was reminiscent of the Z3M coupe. When they released the 3-door, it was a bit better still.
I said when the 1 hatch came out that it was reminiscent of the Z3M coupe. When they released the 3-door, it was a bit better still.
The same sort of people who like their plates piling up with crap food at various low rent eateries instead of sufficient high quality produce somewhere else.
I was lucky enough to drive an e90 320si and that's the kind of direction BMW should be going in rather than yet more bloated, overweight, overpowered cars for the brainless brigade.
#12
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Secretly saving for another Blobeye STI. Crystal Grey. Widetrack
Posts: 1,985
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Over the years the M3 has just got bigger and bigger and althought its an awesome car I am attracted to smaller dimensions in such a motor.
#13
The Lexus Altezza (based on the IS200) had a 4-pot, despite the normal IS series using 6-pot engines.
#14
Scooby Regular
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Ascended to the next level
Posts: 7,498
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well the 3.2 6pot is going spare these days...it would be rude not to plonk that in
Maybe swap some bodypanels for carbon fibre because the damn things weighs so much. M1 CSL has a nice ring to it
That's the biggest issue I have with the 1-er, there is negligable weight advantage over an equivelent 3-er. Sort the weight, and it would be a stormer.
Maybe swap some bodypanels for carbon fibre because the damn things weighs so much. M1 CSL has a nice ring to it
That's the biggest issue I have with the 1-er, there is negligable weight advantage over an equivelent 3-er. Sort the weight, and it would be a stormer.
Last edited by Shark Man; 23 November 2007 at 07:34 PM.
#15
This guy likes it. He makes a quite convincing case for it.
BMW 135i M Sports Coupé: Oh sweet music - Telegraph
BMW 135i M Sports Coupé: Oh sweet music - Telegraph
#17
I don't see how they could have a 4-pot M when there is already a 6-pot (turbo'd?) 135? M has to be the market leader, the 6 would trounce it for hairy chested power output, esp if chipped.
I said when the 1 hatch came out that it was reminiscent of the Z3M coupe. When they released the 3-door, it was a bit better still.
I said when the 1 hatch came out that it was reminiscent of the Z3M coupe. When they released the 3-door, it was a bit better still.
with the M sport pack being fitted to just about every version, its hardly surprising.
The current X3 twin turbo diesel has more power than some of the 3 series saloons
Mart
#18
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Secretly saving for another Blobeye STI. Crystal Grey. Widetrack
Posts: 1,985
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Agree but I'm imagining something that harks back to the original M3 but obviously in the 1 series shell. Nothing with all the electrics just a simple back wheel drive howler
#19
Scooby Regular
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Ascended to the next level
Posts: 7,498
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Bin the SMG gearbox option on all M-cars (lazy people should not have automatic M-cars ). And bin the clutch damper valve on the full manual version too.
Bin the variable steering assistance/ servotroinc
Bin the electronic drive-by-wire throttle (and consequentally the torque control/ MSR)
Bin the DSC that annyongly cuts power dead when it sniffs a micron of wheelspin
Bin the runflats
Bin the excessive sound deadening/insulation, so one can hear the engine ( and save a bit more weight)
And all the computer/automated bits that make it weigh over 1.5tons. So no electric seats with memory, no auto headlamps, no xenons, no auto wipers, no PDC, no active suspension (option anyway), no auto dimming mirror, no trip computer.
Shirley, that would have knocked off 100kg at least?
#21
Scooby Regular
Springs/dampers are different for a start.
BTW, Autocar drove the 135i against a Cayman (6 grand more for the base Cayman, so yeah, nice one Autocar ) and a 350Z
Cayman came top (no surprise from Autocar) but they recon the 135i was the best all rounder so second and way ahead of the 350Z which is the same price as the beemer.
135i was fastest by a fair bit, they recon.
That Tii concept hts the mark, I recon. Give it the hydraulic power steering from the previous generation 1 series, carbon bonnet, boot & roof, no fancy heavy extras, 16" wheels no wider than 7.5" and proper tyres. Stick the engine from the 320si in. Sell it for £20k, and they'd have a winner
Last edited by Devildog; 24 November 2007 at 11:13 PM.
#23
I was wondering why whatcar listed the most expensive 1 series as £75000 when i brought my audi a3, anyway the reason was this
Fastest BMW 1 Series : HARTGE H1 5.0
5.0 v8 in a 1 series anyone?
Fastest BMW 1 Series : HARTGE H1 5.0
5.0 v8 in a 1 series anyone?
#24
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: same time, different place
Posts: 11,313
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
2 Posts
Fun, but probably handles more like an Audi than a BMW. The telegraph article above talks about "the weight of the engine" and that's a straight six - imagine a V8. And the 135i apparently does 0-60 in 5.3 - the V8 in 4.6 is not so impressive then, if it costs double. I'd prefer the 135, breathed on, with weight reductions as above, for considerably less money I suspect.
Last edited by Brendan Hughes; 27 November 2007 at 11:34 AM.
#26
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: www.tiovicente.com
Posts: 2,006
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well the 3.2 6pot is going spare these days...it would be rude not to plonk that in
Maybe swap some bodypanels for carbon fibre because the damn things weighs so much. M1 CSL has a nice ring to it
That's the biggest issue I have with the 1-er, there is negligable weight advantage over an equivelent 3-er. Sort the weight, and it would be a stormer.
Maybe swap some bodypanels for carbon fibre because the damn things weighs so much. M1 CSL has a nice ring to it
That's the biggest issue I have with the 1-er, there is negligable weight advantage over an equivelent 3-er. Sort the weight, and it would be a stormer.
I'd be surprised if they build an M version as this would compete too closely with the M3. Having driven both cars, the M3 feels distinctly quicker and surprisingly more wieldy than the 135i but then, like all M cars, it doesn't suffer from the RFTs fitted to the rest of the range which are totally unsuitable for UK roads.
#27
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post