Evo 9 makes 928bhp
#1
Evo 9 makes 928bhp
Norris's evo 9, makes 928bhp and 739 lbs of torque, on the bench dyno, well done, he may need it for next year ,
Mitsubishi Lancer Register Forum - Norris Designs 900+bhp 700+Clb-ft
Mitsubishi Lancer Register Forum - Norris Designs 900+bhp 700+Clb-ft
#3
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Chesterfield
Posts: 2,939
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Sub97
How reliable is that though?
Or is that a stupid question
Or is that a stupid question
Pretty impressive I say.
#6
Originally Posted by evo north
Norris's evo 9, makes 928bhp and 739 lbs of torque, on the bench dyno, well done, he may need it for next year ,
Mitsubishi Lancer Register Forum - Norris Designs 900+bhp 700+Clb-ft
Mitsubishi Lancer Register Forum - Norris Designs 900+bhp 700+Clb-ft
Trending Topics
#8
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 860
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car is used for Time attack and demos so does a few miles (obviously not road mileage), generally fairly reliable engine wise although it has had issues with hoses and manifolds as far as I gather, no worse than the Scooby equivalent cars though!!!
#9
Scooby Regular
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Avoiding tractors and OAP's!!!
Posts: 1,282
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
As Mangel says above its pretty reliable considering the power. Did well at this years TOTB where other similar powered cars fell by the wayside.
Wolfie.
Wolfie.
#10
Scooby Regular
Join Date: May 2006
Location: alternate between home and work
Posts: 221
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Just found these on MLR nice figures
0-10mph 0.498sec (2nd run)
0-20mph 1.053sec (2nd run)
0-30mph 1.515sec (2nd run)
0-40mph 1.943sec (2nd run)
0-50mph 2.399sec (2nd run)
0-60mph 3.133sec (1st run)
0-70mph 3.532sec (1st run)
0-80mph 3.951sec (1st run)
0-90mph 4.559sec (1st run)
0-100mph 5.078sec (1st run)
0-110mph 5.681sec (1st run)
0-120mph 6.354sec (1st run)
0-130mph 7.335sec (1st run)
0-140mph 8.226sec (1st run)
0-150mph 9.280sec (1st run)
100-150mph 4.202sec
Santa Pod timing slip details (2nd run)
9.777sec @ 154.67mph
The best times we recorded from his old car:
0-30mph 1.37sec
0-60mph 2.69sec
0-100mph 5.63sec
0-150mph 12.02sec
100-150mph 6.28sec
Couple of ramdom super car times
Veyron 0-120 7.3sec
F1 0-100 6.3sec
0-10mph 0.498sec (2nd run)
0-20mph 1.053sec (2nd run)
0-30mph 1.515sec (2nd run)
0-40mph 1.943sec (2nd run)
0-50mph 2.399sec (2nd run)
0-60mph 3.133sec (1st run)
0-70mph 3.532sec (1st run)
0-80mph 3.951sec (1st run)
0-90mph 4.559sec (1st run)
0-100mph 5.078sec (1st run)
0-110mph 5.681sec (1st run)
0-120mph 6.354sec (1st run)
0-130mph 7.335sec (1st run)
0-140mph 8.226sec (1st run)
0-150mph 9.280sec (1st run)
100-150mph 4.202sec
Santa Pod timing slip details (2nd run)
9.777sec @ 154.67mph
The best times we recorded from his old car:
0-30mph 1.37sec
0-60mph 2.69sec
0-100mph 5.63sec
0-150mph 12.02sec
100-150mph 6.28sec
Couple of ramdom super car times
Veyron 0-120 7.3sec
F1 0-100 6.3sec
#13
Watching that video I reckon a well set up hot hatch would give it something to think about round that sprint track. Spend umpteen thousands getting yourself a 900bhp car as a show piece for your company, then have its **** kicked by a 172 round a sprint circuit
Great for the strip, not much good for anything else IMHO
Great for the strip, not much good for anything else IMHO
#14
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: still behind twin turbos
Posts: 469
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Gutmann pug
Great for the strip, not much good for anything else IMHO
#17
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: still behind twin turbos
Posts: 469
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Gutmann pug
Did you miss the rest of my post?
#18
Originally Posted by cottonfoo
No, but then I might as well say "a 747 is crap around London". I think you just like to put things down or something.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Sam Witwicky
Engine Management and ECU Remapping
17
13 November 2015 10:49 AM