205 GTI 1.9
#1
BANNED
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Glad to be of service
Posts: 713
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
205 GTI 1.9
Thinking of buying one of these for my girlfriend, have owned a 1.6 and 1.9 before so not a total noob.
What I'm wondering is does the 1.9 run OK on 98 ron unleaded fuel? I'm asking this because mine expired shortly after I sold it. Big ends the guy I sold it to said although he knows next to nothing about cars (otherwise he wouldn't have bought that shed off me!). Something to do with the fuel perhaps?
Also anyone know what year they were catalysed from and if there are any particularly special editions I should be looking for? Obviously would like a 'One FM' but they rarely come up for sale.
What I'm wondering is does the 1.9 run OK on 98 ron unleaded fuel? I'm asking this because mine expired shortly after I sold it. Big ends the guy I sold it to said although he knows next to nothing about cars (otherwise he wouldn't have bought that shed off me!). Something to do with the fuel perhaps?
Also anyone know what year they were catalysed from and if there are any particularly special editions I should be looking for? Obviously would like a 'One FM' but they rarely come up for sale.
#2
Scooby Regular
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Infractions - Scoobynet's version of the "scamera" van
Posts: 1,005
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Unleaded fuel in a car designed for leaded shouldn't cause big end failure (at least not before other problems were pretty obvious)
Catalysed from 1990 - 1994 ( engine type XU9JAZ). Less power and torque than the non cat cars.
The non catalyst cars - engine type XU9JA were still produced until 1993
(Remember when catalysts were optional..LOL..)
I would assume that anything post 1990 would run on unleaded quite happily.
My 1.9 was an '89 on an F plate. Can't recall what fuel I put in.
Catalysed from 1990 - 1994 ( engine type XU9JAZ). Less power and torque than the non cat cars.
The non catalyst cars - engine type XU9JA were still produced until 1993
(Remember when catalysts were optional..LOL..)
I would assume that anything post 1990 would run on unleaded quite happily.
My 1.9 was an '89 on an F plate. Can't recall what fuel I put in.
#4
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Scoobynet
Posts: 5,387
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ive always used 98ron in my 1.9's, and never had any problems. I did get hardened valve seats fitted to my first 1.9 as they are designed for leaded - but never had any problems with the others I had running on 98ron with the stock valve seats.
Try and find a Turbo Technics 1.9! Not special editions, but it was a factory approved conversion upping the power from 130bhp to 175bhp with 50% more torque.
Try and find a Turbo Technics 1.9! Not special editions, but it was a factory approved conversion upping the power from 130bhp to 175bhp with 50% more torque.
#5
Never run SUL in mine ......... forgive me if i'm wrong but surely they are made to run on normal unleaded arent they?
Mine has had a hell of a hard life and never had an issue ......
gary
Mine has had a hell of a hard life and never had an issue ......
gary
#6
Scooby Regular
Some duff info in this thread, so to correct it...
Anything after a 1987 model has no problems running on NUL or SUL, anything before is more than likely fine also.
Catalyst models were from late 92, but mostly 93 onwards. Anything before October 92 will be fine. But, bear in mind the cat models have a much better engine management system and run a lot better as they don't usually have an AFM, and in reality the book figures are pretty much the same (i.e. the non cat 130bhp vs the cat 122bhp model usually make the same RR power).
92 on models suffer from paint lacquer problems.
Using NUL/SUL on a car not designed for it would damage the valve seats, and the cylinder head and wouldn't touch the bottom end.
1990 Miami and Laser specials with grey leather, also Sorrento and Steel Gray worth a punt.
1FM model is just tarted up with Aircon and CD Player, not worth the premium over std.
Anything after a 1987 model has no problems running on NUL or SUL, anything before is more than likely fine also.
Catalyst models were from late 92, but mostly 93 onwards. Anything before October 92 will be fine. But, bear in mind the cat models have a much better engine management system and run a lot better as they don't usually have an AFM, and in reality the book figures are pretty much the same (i.e. the non cat 130bhp vs the cat 122bhp model usually make the same RR power).
92 on models suffer from paint lacquer problems.
Using NUL/SUL on a car not designed for it would damage the valve seats, and the cylinder head and wouldn't touch the bottom end.
1990 Miami and Laser specials with grey leather, also Sorrento and Steel Gray worth a punt.
1FM model is just tarted up with Aircon and CD Player, not worth the premium over std.
#7
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Hampshire
Posts: 10,954
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Just to add to what DW said.
The 1.9 and 1.6 precat engines were designed to run on leaded petrol. Therefore you really should run them on the highest octane you can.
However - they will run perfectly fine on NUL - providing you adjust the timing to suit so it doesn't pink - might lose a hew bhp but not much.
Personally - always ran/run mine on Optimax/V-Power............
The 1.9 and 1.6 precat engines were designed to run on leaded petrol. Therefore you really should run them on the highest octane you can.
However - they will run perfectly fine on NUL - providing you adjust the timing to suit so it doesn't pink - might lose a hew bhp but not much.
Personally - always ran/run mine on Optimax/V-Power............
Trending Topics
#8
BANNED
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Glad to be of service
Posts: 713
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Some useful info there. Looks like I'm going to be going for a Sorrento catalysed 93 car I've found then. Has the green interior which I'm not sure about but 60K miles, FSH and 2 grand sounds like a bargain to me.
#10
BANNED
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Glad to be of service
Posts: 713
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Dream Weaver
Defo sounds a bargain, the green interior is lovely.
I bought my 1990 1.9 in 2001 and it cost me £900 with 50K miles on it. These cars seem to be going up in value.
#12
Scooby Regular
The red interior is authentic in an 80's hot hatch way, but the green interior makes it look more modern, so depends what you want.
I don't mind the red carpet though there is a black option about as well.
I don't mind the red carpet though there is a black option about as well.
#17
BANNED
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Glad to be of service
Posts: 713
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by EVOLUTION
why would you want to run it on SUL?
put the fuel thats meant to be in it, NUL
put the fuel thats meant to be in it, NUL
#18
Scooby Regular
Originally Posted by EVOLUTION
why would you want to run it on SUL?
put the fuel thats meant to be in it, NUL
put the fuel thats meant to be in it, NUL
Mine's running throttle bodies and is mapped on Optimax, so it runs best on that and above
#19
My (very) old website said something on fuel and 205 GTi - hope it helps
http://www.renaissance59.fsnet.co.uk/pug/problems.html
http://www.renaissance59.fsnet.co.uk/pug/problems.html
#20
my 1991 1.9 road rally car runs fine on NUL but i use SUL for events, no issues with engine problems, i've got a H reg steel grey 1.9 non sunroof road car too, bought it last year for £400
#21
Just becuase the car has a CAT it doesnt mean it needs SUL.
Mine is a 1990 model so what should I be using? ...........
I have been thrashing the living death out of it on NUL for the past 3 years without issue, should I be paying more for my fuel and using Optimax? ....... not that im going to anyway
Mine is a 1990 model so what should I be using? ...........
I have been thrashing the living death out of it on NUL for the past 3 years without issue, should I be paying more for my fuel and using Optimax? ....... not that im going to anyway
#22
BANNED
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Glad to be of service
Posts: 713
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Gutmann pug
Just becuase the car has a CAT it doesnt mean it needs SUL.
Mine is a 1990 model so what should I be using? ...........
I have been thrashing the living death out of it on NUL for the past 3 years without issue, should I be paying more for my fuel and using Optimax? ....... not that im going to anyway
Mine is a 1990 model so what should I be using? ...........
I have been thrashing the living death out of it on NUL for the past 3 years without issue, should I be paying more for my fuel and using Optimax? ....... not that im going to anyway
I for one wasn't suggesting a car with CAT would need SUL, rather that the cars designed to run on leaded fuel might give more power with it. Guess it depends on how your car is tuned more than anything else.
As I said earlier in the thread the guy who bought my 1.9 from me said the engine went pop shortly after he bought it because as he put it ' it made the big ends go'. Obvious pap as I thought and has been confirmed but it does make you wonder what caused it to die.
#23
Scooby Regular
Depends how the engine went, and what the symptoms were.
My last engine died, and after removing it and stripping it down it turned out to be a exploded dizzy cap, luckily the engine needed removing anyway but at the time it sounded like bottom end - the broken dizzy was making the noise.
My last engine died, and after removing it and stripping it down it turned out to be a exploded dizzy cap, luckily the engine needed removing anyway but at the time it sounded like bottom end - the broken dizzy was making the noise.
#24
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Hampshire
Posts: 10,954
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Gutmann pug
Just becuase the car has a CAT it doesnt mean it needs SUL.
Mine is a 1990 model so what should I be using? ...........
I have been thrashing the living death out of it on NUL for the past 3 years without issue, should I be paying more for my fuel and using Optimax? ....... not that im going to anyway
Mine is a 1990 model so what should I be using? ...........
I have been thrashing the living death out of it on NUL for the past 3 years without issue, should I be paying more for my fuel and using Optimax? ....... not that im going to anyway
#26
BANNED
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Glad to be of service
Posts: 713
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Olly
Selling mine soon Vapid; so if your sale falls through, and you fancy a real nice one...
Although I think DW has first dibs...
Although I think DW has first dibs...
#27
Scooby Regular
Originally Posted by Olly
Selling mine soon Vapid; so if your sale falls through, and you fancy a real nice one...
Although I think DW has first dibs...
Although I think DW has first dibs...
Where do you live then Vapid?
#28
BANNED
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Glad to be of service
Posts: 713
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Dream Weaver
PM me when you decide to sell, if I don't have it I know a few people that are after one.
Where do you live then Vapid?
Where do you live then Vapid?
#30
Originally Posted by Vapid
There's a three eurocent premium for 98 ron over 95 where I live. Which would you use?
.
.