Notices
Other Marques Non-Subaru Vehicles

e36 m3??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 1, 2006 | 11:10 AM
  #1  
Tasberley's Avatar
Tasberley
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,184
Likes: 0
From: Another scooby? I must be mad!
Default e36 m3??

hiya guys,

Thinking of getting an e36 m3 or e36 m3 evo. I have a budget of around £7k.

Does anybody own one on here or has previously owned one? What are they like?

Whats the typical mpg?

Whats things should i be looking out for when looking at cars to buy. If its the evo ive heard that the vanos unit can cause problems?

ANy help, much appreciated.

Cheers
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2006 | 11:26 AM
  #2  
The Chief's Avatar
The Chief
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 8,328
Likes: 0
From: There is only one God - Elvis!
Default

I'm no expert but dont get the evo - it has vanos issues, get the pre evo it still chucks out over 286 bhp and is deemed more reliable.
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2006 | 11:27 AM
  #3  
Brendan Hughes's Avatar
Brendan Hughes
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 11,314
Likes: 4
From: same time, different place
Default

I think Leslie has one and BigMan had one...
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2006 | 11:35 AM
  #4  
Scooby400's Avatar
Scooby400
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 227
Likes: 0
Default

I've had three.

My first was a 1995 3.0 Coupe. Over 120k miles - went like stink. A really strong car.

I then bought a 1996 3.2 Evo Convertible. I actually had them both for about 2 weeks and whilst the convertible Evo was more desirable, the 3.0 was noticeably quicker and stronger feeling. It may have been because the 3.2 was a convertible, or it may have just been a rough one.

I then bought a 1999 3.2 Evo Convertible. This was a better engine than my other Evo. I fitted a heat shielded induction kit, a supersprint exhaust and had it remapped and it got 332 bhp at an e36 rolling road day. Most powerful one there.

So both my Evo's were convertibles, and my 3.0 was a coupe. I went in my friends Evo coupe the other day and that was quick. So whereas I first thought the less powerful 3.0 felt quicker than the Evo, I'm beginning to think now that perhaps it just that the convertibles are slower. Although on paper they are not.

Evo's do have a problem with the double vanos. I personally have never had a problem - guess I've just been lucky.

My advice to you is to try and buy a 1996 N reg 3.0 with as fewer miles as possible. I think with your budget you'd end up with a rough Evo which could cost a fortune to keep on the road. If you could get a 60k miles 1-2 owner 3.0 car that would be a very good buy which would lose little money.

Good luck.
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2006 | 12:39 PM
  #5  
Tasberley's Avatar
Tasberley
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,184
Likes: 0
From: Another scooby? I must be mad!
Default

cheers for the advice. after looking at prices etc it does look like i would be better getting an 3.0 m3 coupe...

whats the handling like??
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2006 | 12:47 PM
  #6  
Scooby400's Avatar
Scooby400
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 227
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Tasberley
cheers for the advice. after looking at prices etc it does look like i would be better getting an 3.0 m3 coupe...

whats the handling like??
If I had £7k to spend thats deffo what I'd be going for. Black preferably.

Handling's quite good. Eibach Pro springs improve it a lot though.
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2006 | 01:02 PM
  #7  
Tasberley's Avatar
Tasberley
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,184
Likes: 0
From: Another scooby? I must be mad!
Default

what sort of mpg should i expect?
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2006 | 01:07 PM
  #8  
Scooby400's Avatar
Scooby400
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 227
Likes: 0
Default

How long is a piece of string??

I have a pretty heavy right foot and all my driving is short local trips. I used to get just shy of about 200 miles out of a tank of Optimax.

On a run you'll see 20-25.
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2006 | 02:40 PM
  #9  
Tasberley's Avatar
Tasberley
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,184
Likes: 0
From: Another scooby? I must be mad!
Default

how bigs the tank? 60 ltr?
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2006 | 03:19 PM
  #10  
Scooby400's Avatar
Scooby400
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 227
Likes: 0
Default

About that I think. Took about £55 worth when it was just under £1/litre.
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2006 | 06:14 PM
  #11  
FletchCSL's Avatar
FletchCSL
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
Default

Hi, another former Evo coupe owner here. Mpg is good about 28 if your on the motorway. Its better with the evo as it has six gears as opposed to the 3.0's five. Check out www.bm3w.co.uk

As for VANOS if you get past 70k mileage then general feeling is there will be no problems. About 40% of the cars in total were affected including mine which was done under warranty then had no problems. But there is a considerable performance loss if the VANOS goes awol.

I dont think you budget will stretch to it but look out for the limited addition GT1, its had the bulletproof 3.0 engine but uprated to 295bhp - the one in evo magazine managed 305bhp standard.
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2006 | 11:54 PM
  #12  
Terminator X's Avatar
Terminator X
Owner of SNet
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 11,513
Likes: 0
From: Berkshire
Default

Just buy one with the vanos already sorted?

TX.
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2006 | 07:49 AM
  #13  
fatscoobyfella's Avatar
fatscoobyfella
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,662
Likes: 0
Default

Ive had a 3.0litre coupe,I thought the car was fantastic.Car went very well,only mod was a supersprint exhaust.I regularly did 300 miles a week in mine,mostly motorway and i used to see over 30MPG.
Personally i would go for the best non evo i could..Not only does the vanos have issues,but the 6 speed box is a bit unreliable too,and you Cannot repair them..Just be aware as i think a second hand unit are currently around £1200.

Go on www.e36coupe.com and have a search,there is loads of info on there..

HTH
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2006 | 10:45 AM
  #14  
shustir's Avatar
shustir
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 385
Likes: 0
From: West Yorkshire
Default

Owned a 1999 M3 EVO Cab. One thing I did find quite bad was scuttle shake, go over a bump and the car felt as if it wobbled. This did go away after a while though probably couldn't feel it any more. MPG was so so I used to do a few short journeys and some medium journeys (8+ miles) and would get 220 miles from a tank 60 litres. Performance was OK and fairly good on motorway. Best of all was the just the pleasure of driving on a nice day with the roof down, although I wouldn't miss it in winter.

I did have a few problems with mine in 2 years of ownership even with a full BMW service history. Required a new water pump and new gear selector fork, clutch and flywheel. Servicing and maintenance costs are not cheap ! Although no problems with VANOS but it had been replaced by previous owner with a bill of £2500. I'm glad I owned it but wouldn't bother with another one.
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2006 | 11:11 AM
  #15  
Brendan Hughes's Avatar
Brendan Hughes
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 11,314
Likes: 4
From: same time, different place
Default

Originally Posted by Terminator X
Just buy one with the vanos already sorted?

TX.
I've tried to follow MCoupes, and the comments were that just because it has been done once is no guarantee that it won't go again. I'm guessing it's the same engine.
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2006 | 06:54 PM
  #16  
rb5_336's Avatar
rb5_336
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 955
Likes: 0
From: Sussex
Default

I had an E36 M3 EVO and loved it. There are plenty around that have has the vanos work performed under warrenty, or are still under extended warranty. I've had loads of desierable cars, and the e36 m3 evo is a fantastic all rounder

here's a list of cars i've had

Sean
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2006 | 09:06 AM
  #17  
Scooby400's Avatar
Scooby400
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 227
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by rb5_336
I had an E36 M3 EVO and loved it.




Despite it having that awful steering wheel??


Nice e30.
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2006 | 07:26 PM
  #18  
rb5_336's Avatar
rb5_336
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 955
Likes: 0
From: Sussex
Default

yeah the wood pack wouldnt be my first choice The sport evo is a legend!
Reply
Old Aug 8, 2006 | 12:36 AM
  #19  
Terminator X's Avatar
Terminator X
Owner of SNet
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 11,513
Likes: 0
From: Berkshire
Angry

Blimey, that's mad

Originally Posted by Brendan Hughes
I've tried to follow MCoupes, and the comments were that just because it has been done once is no guarantee that it won't go again. I'm guessing it's the same engine.
Reply
Old Aug 8, 2006 | 09:25 AM
  #20  
gatty's Avatar
gatty
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,486
Likes: 0
From: shine on you crazy diamond
Default

the m3 e36 3.0 was my first real fast car(started with a pug 1.9) looking back the bmw was a real cracker. fast and smooth. it takes a real good driver to get the best out of one, which i aint.

cant comment on the evo but heard a lot of negatives which are covered on this thread.

as for tunning , i had my bmw de catted new shreik cams fitted new panel filter then got it mapped, it was around 340 bhp at the flywheel. this cost me around 2k to do . and looking back the standard 286 bhp was enough so theres my account on owning a e36 m3 . a real beaut.
Reply
Old Aug 8, 2006 | 11:23 AM
  #21  
scoobynutta555's Avatar
scoobynutta555
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 8,541
Likes: 0
From: Markyate.Imprezas owned:-wrx-sti5typeR-p1-uk22b-modded my00. Amongst others!
Default

What fuel do they run on, ordinary NUL or Optimax and the like?
Reply
Old Aug 8, 2006 | 11:43 AM
  #22  
gatty's Avatar
gatty
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,486
Likes: 0
From: shine on you crazy diamond
Default

Originally Posted by scoobynutta555
What fuel do they run on, ordinary NUL or Optimax and the like?

either. (tunned) optimax
Reply
Old Aug 10, 2006 | 12:59 PM
  #23  
FletchCSL's Avatar
FletchCSL
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
Default

always ran better on optimax, but normal stuff is fine
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2006 | 10:02 PM
  #24  
Tasberley's Avatar
Tasberley
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,184
Likes: 0
From: Another scooby? I must be mad!
Default

hiya guys,

whats the smg box like?? any good or should it be avoided?
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2006 | 10:06 PM
  #25  
leonpoole's Avatar
leonpoole
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,564
Likes: 0
From: Teesside
Default

https://www.scoobynet.com/whats-m3-smg-t535111.html

I know its about the SMG 2, but that was ment to be an improvement
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2006 | 10:16 PM
  #26  
Tasberley's Avatar
Tasberley
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,184
Likes: 0
From: Another scooby? I must be mad!
Default

ta
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2006 | 05:35 PM
  #27  
Mentor's Avatar
Mentor
Scooby Newbie
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Default

that wood pack option looks vile!
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2006 | 09:11 PM
  #28  
Yakker's Avatar
Yakker
Scooby Newbie
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Default

we ran a 98 evo coupe for a couple of years

gorgeous motor - quick, smooth, reliable

downside is it attracted the wrong sort of attention - sold it on (huge depreciation) - but really miss it


difficult to get the kids in the back though ;-)


customer service (dick lovett in swindon) was brillliant - way way way better than any other garage I've ever dealt with - miles ahead of any of the ******* volvo dealers that I put up with at the moment...
Reply




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:41 PM.