Notices
Other Marques Non-Subaru Vehicles

Dang - Toasted a CTR!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11 June 2003, 12:10 AM
  #1  
LG John
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
LG John's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Bradford
Posts: 13,720
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Red face

Met up with one of the local Edinburgh lads tonight for a run in his CTR We went down to peebles, had turn around in each others car and then came back together. At points there were some spirited driving and unfortunately for me my car is too bloody quick

As well you know I'm thinking of buying a ctr as a replacement for the scooby and was hoping for similar 60mph+ performance but it just doesn't seem to be the case. The scooby was pulling out massive leads in nearly all tests

The lad I met did have a passenger which would affect an N/A more than a turbo but when all three of us were in the CTR it was noted that the Impreza was a LOT faster! Even when the CTR hit VTEC it didn't seem to do a whole lot other than make a shed load of noise! (he has zorst and filter and RR @ 215bhp so its not even standard). That said I did notice that the guy for whatever reason seemed a little 'VTEC lazy' in that he was not always sitting ready in the zone and often changed and dropped out of it. Not sure if it was sympathy, his style, nerves or what!?

The big test was on the way back we pulled of a small roundabout with a massive (you could reach 150 if you wanted - we didn't btw) straight and no cars. I was in front and gave him the hazards which I'd told him was his few seconds warning to get ready in VTEC. We nailed it and from 30 to *ahem* the scooby pulled 10+ car lengths. In other words reduced him to a dot!!

****, bollocks, **** Please someone tell me they are quicker than this!? My car isn't exactly the "Starship John Banks NCC TD05-A" but still thrashed the Honda I'll still test drive one and see if I can get it for a day and really rev the ***** of it but for now it's looking like I should got the whole downgrading hog and get an oil burner with creature comforts and be done with performance cars for a while

Figuratively speaking what should it be able to do with its fwd 197bph?
Old 11 June 2003, 12:20 AM
  #2  
Brun
Scooby Senior
 
Brun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Harrogate
Posts: 14,229
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Post

"Starship John Banks NCC TD05-A"
LMFAO
Old 11 June 2003, 12:25 AM
  #3  
MooseRacer
Scooby Regular
 
MooseRacer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Sodding Chipbury
Posts: 2,702
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

SB - get one that's done a good few miles and rev the nuts off it yourself. Only then will you know.
Old 11 June 2003, 07:29 AM
  #4  
CC
Scooby Regular
 
CC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 909
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Exclamation

Must have been a BLOODY big toaster?
Old 11 June 2003, 07:36 AM
  #5  
NotoriousREV
Scooby Regular
 
NotoriousREV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 11,581
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Sounds to me like the driver was crap, no way should you be able to pull 10 car lengths on him quickly. My MY93 WRX has about 250hp and didn't pull much against a Clio Cup (maybe 2 lengths at 5000rpm+ in 4th).

But even if he was crap, it shows that the CTR needs commitment to drive quickly, which is fine if thats what you want, personally I'm lazy and prefer "easy to drive fast"

I think you need to test drive one yourself.

Why the change, BTW, you haven't had the Scoob that long?
Old 11 June 2003, 07:42 AM
  #6  
barry_gti
Scooby Newbie
 
barry_gti's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Saxo Boy - What you need to remember is your Scooby is stupidly quick for the mods(in fact I still think your missing some out )

No other Scooby I have seen with a chip and exhaust goes that quick anyway.

So add that in to it.

However I simply don't think the CTR's are as fast as people believe, Supercharged VTR with 145bhp at wheels demolished one, and I mean DEMOLISHED. Young Asian guy driving was going mental "What's in that thing maaaan!!"

Over rated Jap Crap
Old 11 June 2003, 07:55 AM
  #7  
RB5#295
Scooby Regular
 
RB5#295's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 564
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

I'm not a huge fan of the CTR. What about a Leon Cupra R if you want a hatch with similar price but more toys and more go? They can be chipped to 270+bhp for a few hundred quid.

Alternatively go older and get something quick and cool for your £16k.

Fen
Old 11 June 2003, 07:55 AM
  #8  
Autocar
Scooby Regular
 
Autocar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 584
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wink

Saxo gimp what is your obsession with being able to beat subarus? Is that what you look for in a car just drive them see if you like them or keep the subaru stop making such a long drawn out thing of it.
Old 11 June 2003, 08:37 AM
  #9  
turboman786
Scooby Regular
 
turboman786's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 2,458
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

SB...you didn't seriously think that the CTR is a 'fast' car relative to a scoob did you???

Its just a tepid hatch, nowt more...makes lots of noise and is very overrated by those who don't want to invest in a real fast car....
Old 11 June 2003, 08:38 AM
  #10  
Autocar
Scooby Regular
 
Autocar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 584
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

SB...you didn't seriously think that the CTR is a 'fast' car relative to a scoob did you???

Its just a tepid hatch, nowt more...makes lots of noise and is very overrated by those who don't want to invest in a real fast car....
Have you driven one?
Old 11 June 2003, 08:48 AM
  #11  
what would scooby do
Scooby Senior
 
what would scooby do's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: 52 Festive Road
Posts: 28,311
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Never mind my scoob beating one, my Saab turbo gave one a load a grief, biggest problem is that they are always driving around outside of the powerband, therefore you can get a jump on them.

I also drove the bosses's wife's CTR and it's too much hard work to go fast
Old 11 June 2003, 08:57 AM
  #12  
S.B.
Scooby Regular
 
S.B.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: At Tescos Filling Up With 99 Octane!!!
Posts: 4,313
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Talking

We have a scoob and a ctr cant remember when i last drove the scoob.
Old 11 June 2003, 09:13 AM
  #13  
LG John
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
LG John's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Bradford
Posts: 13,720
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Talking

Only then will you know
Know what? The true power of the darkside [cackle]

I honestly thought the CTR would be a secret 60mph+ weapon. I know the Subaru would be outright faster but I hoped that I could get similar 'traction not an issue' performance when I wanted it (i.e. rev it stupid).

Barry my car has a full decat, remapped ECU, more efficient intercooler from a STIV, dawes, samco hoses and now a VTA dump valve which probably sacrifices a bit of performance but sounds Nothing more

The scooby has to go because of the fact I've just bought my flat and I was on the look out for something that is cheaper to run but also has the performance - having read so many 'CTR kept up with me' threads I thought that might be the one

There is a common theme here though! When I had the VTS few would believe that it was a fast as a 172 and there was shock when I beat one at Crail and shock at the 15.3s time. There was then 'no way' my car could get anywhere near 13.3 for the 1/4m yet it did a 13.4 dead. It seems that I have a knack and also total lack of sympathy () for getting cars to go pretty quick in a straight line - if only this applied to cornering On that basis it would be unfair for me to write of any car until I've had half a day with it and I think that's what I should do with the CTR

Warning: This is it now for the next few months. I'll be thinking of CTRs, Golfs, push bikes, gas cars and will probably end up with a Skyline and big credit cards - you've been warned
Old 11 June 2003, 09:22 AM
  #14  
turboman786
Scooby Regular
 
turboman786's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 2,458
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

AUTOCAR...driven one extensively thanks very much.
Old 11 June 2003, 09:27 AM
  #15  
S.B.
Scooby Regular
 
S.B.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: At Tescos Filling Up With 99 Octane!!!
Posts: 4,313
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Talking

very overrated by those who don't want to invest in a real fast car....
Do you call a subaru a REAL fast car then?

Old 11 June 2003, 09:35 AM
  #16  
LG John
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
LG John's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Bradford
Posts: 13,720
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wink

Uh-oh - in true playground fashion there has been a few shoves and a crowd is developing to watch what will likely develop into a scrap

I'll give you 2:1 on S.B.
Old 11 June 2003, 09:41 AM
  #17  
davetc
Scooby Newbie
 
davetc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Talking

145bhp saxo waste a CTR, LOL was he in reverse?

as for scooby(unmodded) vs ctr comes down to driver commitment in my opinion. Also neither a standard scooby or a ctr are "fast" cars they are rapid cars

fast cars are

porsche 911 turbo, TVR, ferrari350 etc
Old 11 June 2003, 10:01 AM
  #18  
turboman786
Scooby Regular
 
turboman786's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 2,458
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

SB...I think SOME subarus are genuinely fast cars, eg Sti v5, P1, RA's etc, but generally they are not that fast.
Old 11 June 2003, 10:19 AM
  #19  
Carlos The Jackel
Scooby Regular
 
Carlos The Jackel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,549
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs up

LOL @ SB - what have you started? - come and buy your handbags here!!
Old 11 June 2003, 11:00 AM
  #20  
black knight
Scooby Regular
 
black knight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 871
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

i own both a v4 type R and CTR, has have the following comments:
(tried and tested at private roads of course in the wee hours)

Acceleration - har! CTR no chance. in other words, started accelerating coming out of roundabt, CTR was left for dead, i think due to handling and power.

In gear acceleration - CTR will kept up with scooby at high revs up to terminal speed of 1++. scooby has better power distribution from 4k onwards and CTR from 6k hence the difference in initial acceleration but at high speed shouldnt see any significant difference when CTR's in Vtec revs.

Personally think for what it is CTR is a fun car and to add cheaper to run but.... my CTR will soon be a CLK based purely on the Stares factor.
Old 11 June 2003, 11:41 AM
  #21  
S.B.
Scooby Regular
 
S.B.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: At Tescos Filling Up With 99 Octane!!!
Posts: 4,313
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wink

I was in front and gave him the hazards
Then put my burberry base ball cap on......
Old 11 June 2003, 11:54 AM
  #22  
juan
Scooby Regular
 
juan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 1,247
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

I'm sure this discussion rings a bell somewhere

[Edited by juan - 6/11/2003 12:01:08 PM]
Old 11 June 2003, 12:43 PM
  #23  
Andrewj
Scooby Regular
 
Andrewj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Smile

I've got an unmodded MY99 Turbo, and hanker after a CTR, cos they look brilliant.

I think I'll hold onto the scoob for a bit, as I don't fancy the idea of having to rant up to 6K everytime I want some decent performance!
Old 11 June 2003, 01:18 PM
  #24  
LG John
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
LG John's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Bradford
Posts: 13,720
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Then put my burberry base ball cap on
LOL, I have no such clothing

It was a pre-arranged signal so he'd know to get ready in or near VTEC to make a fairer acceleration comparison
Old 11 June 2003, 01:43 PM
  #25  
SCOSaltire
Scooby Regular
 
SCOSaltire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,809
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Saxo Boy - what are u after out of ur next car?
Performance compared to others with respect to times / acceleration.
Or perceived performance in isolation.

If its the former, then comparing a cheaper-to-run car against ur scooby might be a bit of a no-win situation.
I know ur saxo was fast - i remember being in my m8s when he changed up from a VTR to a VTS...
not outstanding difference until it was over 5500 rpm IIRC.
Then it was like.. wow

so maybe this guy didnt drive properly to compete against you - not hitting the vtec enough, or effectively.

I think that Diesel power is the secret weapon... in straight line performance anyway
Old 11 June 2003, 01:51 PM
  #26  
SCOSaltire
Scooby Regular
 
SCOSaltire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,809
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

you could always judge it on:
Style
Performance
Damage
and Aggression


*whisper* get the honda *whisper*

if i didnt do 18k miles a year, i would have one

but i do - so its diesel power
Old 11 June 2003, 02:01 PM
  #27  
LG John
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
LG John's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Bradford
Posts: 13,720
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Isn't that what they judge robot wars on?

Golf 150TD beginning to look sensible
Old 11 June 2003, 02:04 PM
  #28  
Dul
Scooby Regular
 
Dul's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Well, we have the luck of currently owning a MY98 with few mods and a BMW 330i. We recently have got a CTR too.
I do not totally agree with some comment about the real performance of the CTR. My experience so far, standard Scooby vs CTR:

Scooby: It’s easier to drive faster. Better low torque. Better grip so faster speed at the exit of the curves. A tiny advantage in acceleration over all.

Heavier, understeer a lot at the entry of the curve, especially on the wet. More difficult to control at the limit.

CTR: Do understeer less in the curve, do a very controllable lift power oversteer. Less body roll. The curve speed is a little bit faster than the Scooby (in flat and dry road). Good running cost. Better gear box. Better brake (efficiency and feeling) More fun to drive.

A bit slower in term of general performance. Nosier on the highway. Need more involvement from the driver to make it run fast. Crappier plastic inside (get scratch too easily)

To summarize my opinion, do not compare the CTR and the Scooby. One is a toy, for fun that makes any ride an enjoyment (if you like that kind) and the other is the best compromise in term of performance, price, comfort and quality. Of course I would never say that you couldn’t have fun in the Impreza.

At the end it’s a matter of what you would expect and personal feeling.
Old 11 June 2003, 02:10 PM
  #29  
James_Monty
Scooby Newbie
 
James_Monty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wink

I own a CTR, the scooby is better to 60 however I have not found there to be anything in it from 60 -100 (Classic Standard Turbo). I did get my *** creamed by an STi 8 from 20-60 a month or so back though!

At knockhill the standard scoobies were no quicker than the CTR, speaking of which, that was an awesome 22B at the last top marques night.

Saxo Boy, is your Scoob not running about 275bhp?
Old 11 June 2003, 02:11 PM
  #30  
Toonman1
Scooby Regular
 
Toonman1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,404
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

We tried a CTR recently as my Wife fancied one. Neither of us were that impressed. The Honda dealer treated us like crap as well, until they saw me go out to my 02 WRX PPP to tell some guy to keep off it. After the test drive they tried the heavy sell too - "So few of them around...", "Hold their value so well..." etc etc

She bought a Scoob.


Quick Reply: Dang - Toasted a CTR!



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:05 PM.