Notices
Non Scooby Related Anything Non-Scooby related

The truth about immigration

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07 January 2014, 06:45 PM
  #1  
warrenm2
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
warrenm2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Epsom
Posts: 5,832
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default The truth about immigration

Tonight on BBC2 9.30

Obviously haven't seen it yet, but my prediction of it will be, "immigrants bring lots of economic benefits to this country so what's your problem?" "Yes there's been a lot but its been wonderful for everyone"

Also wonder how many complaints it will generate, my guess is over 100...
Old 07 January 2014, 06:47 PM
  #2  
the shreksta
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (20)
 
the shreksta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: hinckley
Posts: 8,445
Received 495 Likes on 339 Posts
Default

the truth about immigration............the truth is it ****ing sucks and is destroying our country
Old 07 January 2014, 07:20 PM
  #3  
stevebt
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (8)
 
stevebt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 16,732
Received 33 Likes on 19 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by the shreksta
the truth about immigration............the truth is it ****ing sucks and is destroying our country


This, which ever way the sugar coat it immigration is more about cheap labour.
Old 07 January 2014, 08:01 PM
  #4  
alcazar
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
alcazar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Rl'yeh
Posts: 40,781
Received 27 Likes on 25 Posts
Default

Can't remember the name of the Labour minister who said as much...supposedly a socialist, and he says, "well, at least they are keeping the wage-bill low...."
Old 07 January 2014, 08:04 PM
  #5  
RA Dunk
Scooby Regular
 
RA Dunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: My turbo blows, air lots of it!!
Posts: 9,073
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by warrenm2

but my prediction of it will be, "immigrants bring lots of economic benefits to this country
It's on the BBC so woulden't expect any different TBH, I don't even watch the BBC news anymore..
Old 07 January 2014, 08:30 PM
  #6  
paulr
Scooby Regular
 
paulr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Lincolnshire
Posts: 15,623
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The truth is

1. It highlights how we are failing to train the future workforce
2. Cheap labour keeps costs down
3. If an immigrant is working in your sector "lowering wages" it sucks.
Old 07 January 2014, 08:37 PM
  #7  
ScoobyNoob79
Scooby Regular
 
ScoobyNoob79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Snowdonia
Posts: 803
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Old 07 January 2014, 09:13 PM
  #8  
stilover
Scooby Regular
 
stilover's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Here, There, Everywhere
Posts: 10,619
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'm not watching it, as I know it'll p1ss me off.
Old 07 January 2014, 09:23 PM
  #9  
tony de wonderful
Scooby Regular
 
tony de wonderful's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by stevebt
This, which ever way the sugar coat it immigration is more about cheap labour.
Completely.
Old 07 January 2014, 09:26 PM
  #10  
hodgy0_2
Scooby Regular
 
hodgy0_2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: K
Posts: 15,633
Received 21 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

Why should business pay any more for labour than they legally have too
Old 07 January 2014, 09:29 PM
  #11  
tony de wonderful
Scooby Regular
 
tony de wonderful's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by hodgy0_2
Why should business pay any more for labour than they legally have too
Define 'have to'.
Old 07 January 2014, 10:05 PM
  #12  
RA Dunk
Scooby Regular
 
RA Dunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: My turbo blows, air lots of it!!
Posts: 9,073
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by paulr
The truth is

1. It highlights how we are failing to train the future workforce
Who's fault is it we are short of skilled workers then? Who was it that did away with apprentiships?
Old 07 January 2014, 10:07 PM
  #13  
f1_fan
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (9)
 
f1_fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: .
Posts: 20,035
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RA Dunk
Who's fault is it we are short of skilled workers then? Who was it that did away with apprentiships?
And the industries in which to serve them!
Old 07 January 2014, 10:12 PM
  #14  
RA Dunk
Scooby Regular
 
RA Dunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: My turbo blows, air lots of it!!
Posts: 9,073
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by f1_fan
And the industries in which to serve them!
Yup, the companies themselves are actually as guilty nowadays for making little effort to take on trainees TBh.
Old 07 January 2014, 10:14 PM
  #15  
dpb
Scooby Regular
 
dpb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: riding the crest of a wave ...
Posts: 46,493
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

If the country wasn't doing so very well, these people wouldn't roll up would they?

Old 07 January 2014, 10:25 PM
  #16  
ScoobyWon't
Scooby Regular
 
ScoobyWon't's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Pot Belly HQ
Posts: 16,694
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dpb
If the country wasn't doing so very well, these people wouldn't roll up would they?

Maybe it's as we're not doing as badly as the other countries.
Old 07 January 2014, 10:27 PM
  #17  
dpb
Scooby Regular
 
dpb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: riding the crest of a wave ...
Posts: 46,493
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ScoobyNoob79
Thing is though his speech completely backfired on him, more or less the end of him

One of the first career politicians. The racist undertone just cemented his downfall


And he was proven wrong
Old 07 January 2014, 10:33 PM
  #18  
warrenm2
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
warrenm2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Epsom
Posts: 5,832
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Well I think I pretty much nailed it. No mention of "rubbing the rights noses in diversity" I see, no film clips of people in Boston, Leicester, Luton or Bradford, no talk of muslim vigilante patrols, just a whole load of talking heads saying they got it wrong but its for the good of the country. Pretty much the first immigrant they talked to said how he liked getting the benefits, but no discussion on the numbers of immigrants out of work or claiming benefits. Same old BBC

The sooner UKIP is elected the better

Last edited by warrenm2; 07 January 2014 at 10:35 PM.
Old 07 January 2014, 10:40 PM
  #19  
ScoobyWon't
Scooby Regular
 
ScoobyWon't's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Pot Belly HQ
Posts: 16,694
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The sooner the BBC is no longer tax-payer funded the better.
Old 07 January 2014, 10:43 PM
  #20  
dpb
Scooby Regular
 
dpb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: riding the crest of a wave ...
Posts: 46,493
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

I bet it's less than 13% , a lot less

Why on earth would you claim when you can earn 6 x
Old 07 January 2014, 10:49 PM
  #21  
warrenm2
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
warrenm2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Epsom
Posts: 5,832
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dpb
I bet it's less than 13% , a lot less

Why on earth would you claim when you can earn 6 x
http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/436...re-NOT-working
Old 07 January 2014, 10:49 PM
  #22  
madscoob
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
madscoob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: u cant touch this
Posts: 3,084
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by hodgy0_2
Why should business pay any more for labour than they legally have too
indeed, the mp's make the wage law's, and we all know they are shareholders in said companies, as for the immigrant's if the choose to they can earn more than the min wage begging on the street's, anyone remember the name of the begger in london who they estimated was on 25-30 grand a year begging, the benefit's agency took him to court and made him pay back his benefit's
Old 07 January 2014, 11:24 PM
  #23  
Martin2005
Scooby Regular
 
Martin2005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Type 25. Build No.34
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by warrenm2

The sooner UKIP is elected the better
lol
Old 08 January 2014, 12:37 AM
  #24  
paulr
Scooby Regular
 
paulr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Lincolnshire
Posts: 15,623
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RA Dunk
Yup, the companies themselves are actually as guilty nowadays for making little effort to take on trainees TBh.
Why train someone when you can import them. It has to be government led.
Old 08 January 2014, 06:32 AM
  #25  
ditchmyster
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (7)
 
ditchmyster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Living the dream
Posts: 13,624
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Yes, any training needs to be government led and incentivised like the old YTS scheme, which incidentally was criticised and branded as cheap labour, but it taught me to weld at a training centre and got me a job at a tool hire firm as a service technician, both skills I have made use of for over 30yrs.

I'm not so sure that an extra £10 would prise our current crop of benefits scroungers off the couch and away from the 40" flat screen as life is too good, most seem to think they are entitled to at least £500 a week in wages before they would even consider working, lets be fair if they have 3 kids and a fat **** mrs to support they're better off not going to work, which is why they don't.

Government and industry are well aware of this and presumably of the costs involved to train people hence the current situation, importing is unfortunately cheaper than growing your own.

Last edited by ditchmyster; 08 January 2014 at 06:34 AM.
Old 08 January 2014, 06:48 AM
  #26  
paulr
Scooby Regular
 
paulr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Lincolnshire
Posts: 15,623
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ditchmyster
Yes, any training needs to be government led and incentivised like the old YTS scheme, which incidentally was criticised and branded as cheap labour, but it taught me to weld at a training centre and got me a job at a tool hire firm as a service technician, both skills I have made use of for over 30yrs.

I'm not so sure that an extra £10 would prise our current crop of benefits scroungers off the couch and away from the 40" flat screen as life is too good, most seem to think they are entitled to at least £500 a week in wages before they would even consider working, lets be fair if they have 3 kids and a fat **** mrs to support they're better off not going to work, which is why they don't.

Government and industry are well aware of this and presumably of the costs involved to train people hence the current situation, importing is unfortunately cheaper than growing your own.
The YTS was the start of all the problems. Mickey mouse courses that had little value, but that is 30 years ago. You cant blame it all on Maggie. Successive governments have failed too. Just image the outcry if someone decided to introduce a three month A level course. The problem is we still value academic qualifications over vocational and until that changes we will still be importing coded welders etc,etc,etc.
Old 08 January 2014, 07:55 AM
  #27  
ditchmyster
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (7)
 
ditchmyster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Living the dream
Posts: 13,624
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

I don't blame anything on maggie, she was VERY good for me.

I think your mis-understanding my point, I actually think the YTS was a good thing, I only did the first one while waiting to start college, after the first year at college I decided that I didn't like the course I was on or the direction it would take me in employment wise, but because YTS existed I was able to get a job which was hands on AND still go to college once a week to further my studies as well as being able use my credits from the first year of studying to complete my diploma, which is something that would have been virtually impossible had the YTS not existed.

My other point being I doubt very many in this day and age would take the opportunity for such a small increase in pay, most of my extra tenner was taken up in lunch money and I had to walk almost 2 miles to work as there was no direct bus route, can you see some burberry wearing tennants drinking chav doing that today.

Last edited by ditchmyster; 08 January 2014 at 07:59 AM.
Old 08 January 2014, 09:58 AM
  #28  
SinghSuperStud
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
SinghSuperStud's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Walsall
Posts: 1,918
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by paulr
The truth is

1. It highlights how we are failing to train the future workforce
2. Cheap labour keeps costs down
3. If an immigrant is working in your sector "lowering wages" it sucks.
and

4. How inept some our our workforce are

My wife works getting long term unemployed back into work (and actually covers the area in Birm as portrayed on Benefits Steet) and I'm sorry to say that the people she sees generally display no want to get back into employment and are quite happy turning up, wasting time, being abusive and thinking they are entitled to benefits.
Old 08 January 2014, 10:00 AM
  #29  
^Qwerty^
Scooby Regular
 
^Qwerty^'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: East Yorkshire
Posts: 1,764
Likes: 0
Received 25 Likes on 19 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by warrenm2

The sooner UKIP is elected the better
The sad aspect of this is that Tory voters will vote for UKIP, who have no chance of winning, which will then install another disastrous Labour government in to power.

Immigration, EU based or not is now ranked as one of the highest voter issues alongside the economy. For whatever reason, the Tory’s will probably tear themselves apart arguing about it, whilst Labour sit on the side lines and just poke a stick in to further inflame the situation, whilst not committing to any policy on the matter at all. The curve ball, as I see it is DC’s commitment to a referendum on our membership of the EU, if that commitment will be further enforced, and thus back Labour in to a corner, as they don’t want one. Why would you vote for UKIP, if the Tory’s are going to allow you to vote on the issue anyway? Continued membership and immigration are, as far as I see it, one of the same thing.
Old 08 January 2014, 10:16 AM
  #30  
f1_fan
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (9)
 
f1_fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: .
Posts: 20,035
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ^Qwerty^
The sad aspect of this is that Tory voters will vote for UKIP, who have no chance of winning, which will then install another disastrous Labour government in to power.

Immigration, EU based or not is now ranked as one of the highest voter issues alongside the economy. For whatever reason, the Tory’s will probably tear themselves apart arguing about it, whilst Labour sit on the side lines and just poke a stick in to further inflame the situation, whilst not committing to any policy on the matter at all. The curve ball, as I see it is DC’s commitment to a referendum on our membership of the EU, if that commitment will be further enforced, and thus back Labour in to a corner, as they don’t want one. Why would you vote for UKIP, if the Tory’s are going to allow you to vote on the issue anyway? Continued membership and immigration are, as far as I see it, one of the same thing.
Yes but if DC was such a great chap he would give us a referendum before the election. Of course by promising it after the election he is just using it as a carrot to try and win people's votes .... they are all the same sadly.... way too focused on what's in it for them rather than what is right for the country!


Quick Reply: The truth about immigration



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:55 PM.