Cheryl Cole tattoo
Trending Topics
your misses better looking ?
26 August 2013, 12:00 PM
#19
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 48,539
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
26 August 2013, 12:17 PM
#21
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 48,539
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Of course she's a very pretty girl. That's why it's more of a shame that she got her lovely backside covered with tats. There was nothing wrong with it. Not that she had millions of scars and pimples on it. Utter shame. Her curves are kind of lost in those horrible, in-yer-face rose tattoos. Hideous.
26 August 2013, 02:05 PM
#22
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Weston Super Mare, Somerset.
Posts: 14,102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I know nothing about tattoos.
So is her tattoo permanent - must have hurt? - or one of those stick on and remove ones?
How do you tell the difference?
dl
So is her tattoo permanent - must have hurt? - or one of those stick on and remove ones?
How do you tell the difference?
dl
26 August 2013, 04:00 PM
#27
26 August 2013, 04:48 PM
#28
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 48,539
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yes, tattoo transfers are available. Temporary tattoos with black and natural henna are also available. I think some tattoo expert can tell here whether Cheryl's tattoo is really real or not, but it looks so real to the beady eyes like mine that it can't look fake.
Anyway, even if it is a transfer, this mega tattoo looks terribly untrendy for her tiny backside. Good art work, I agree with Rob, but it would have been better on a canvas, not on her flimsy back-to-buttocks. Her backside is lost in that larger than her little self tattoo. If she were so keen, she could have had it smaller in the centre of her back with the stem going down to her butt hole. Then it would have looked as if the sweet smelling roses grow out of her butt hole.
I'm pleased that she got rid of that snake Ashley's name tattoo from her neck. Excuse my French, but he's a d!ck.
26 August 2013, 05:04 PM
#29
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 48,539
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I don't know, you know. Mother in-law brought back some pictures from on of her jollies. She showed a dancer's pictures from one of them touristic shows. She was wearing (dancer, not my mother in-law) big feathers on her head, a shiny leotard with skin shade fishnets and very high heels on. First picture was just of her figure. Honestly, she looked amazingly shaped with big breasts, long legs and all that; about 25 max from her body. Then MIL showed me the next pic with her face. God, she looked even older than my MIL! My MIL was 67 at the time. That dancer looked more like 80 odd, believe me! There was a full London tubes network engraved on her face. Very scary indeed.
Last edited by Turbohot; 26 August 2013 at 05:05 PM.
