the shreksta

iTrader: (20)

or the un-amazing spiderman as it should be called

watched it this afternoon

crap

nuff-said

nyscooby

iTrader: (12)

There was nothing wrong with the toby maguire 1,2 & 3 versions.

yabbadoo4

iTrader: (8)

agreed, i tried to give it a chance as it was a reeboot of the genre but it was pants.

the shreksta

iTrader: (20)

yeah thats what i thought, i thought sam raimi was doing a spiderman 4?

RA Dunk

Am I the only one that enjoyed it?

the shreksta

iTrader: (20)

looks like it pal

stonejedi

iTrader: (51)

I'm a true believer in,if it's not broke don't fix it.the amazing spider man was complete trash compared to spiderman 1&2 or even 3 which was average.

stonejedi

iTrader: (51)

The only reboot that I thought they got spot on was Edward nortons hulk compared with the first one even in avengers ruffalo's take of the hulk was quite good and the cg hulk in avengers was a nice touch also.

stonejedi

iTrader: (51)

I hope they do justice to superman in the man of steel.but I'm not holding my breath.

Kwik

iTrader: (10)

Funnily enough I watched it this afternoon and thought it was disappointing. Spiderman should be dark, like Batman.

the shreksta

iTrader: (20)

is that the one where he bounces over deserts? if so that was awful

as for superman...........................gulp

JohnnyBlaze

I liked it but thought Peter wasn't geeky enough to start, I mean skateboarding seriously? I did not find Garfield likeable at all, also I thought the becoming spiderman section was not long enough. I did like the fact gwen got involved and wasn't just another screaming damsel in distress.

the shreksta

iTrader: (20)

there was no daily bugle either

mrmadcap

I though the Toby Maguire versions were one of the better superhero potrayals of the original story/comicbook. I Also was a bit disappointed with the new version.

stonejedi

iTrader: (51)

No that was the first one your describing which was utter tosh the Edward nortons one came out after the ang Lee version who directed the first film,but the Edward norton who stars in the incredible hulk is definately worth a watch.

the shreksta

iTrader: (20)

ok will have a look on lovefilm-it better be better than that other one tho or else young man..............

stonejedi

iTrader: (51)

Lol.

JohnnyBlaze

Edward norton hulk = great
Eric Banner hulk = poor

Is the big monster in the good one meant to be abomination?

stonejedi

iTrader: (51)

Update this thread once you watched it you should be pleasantly surprised compared with the ten mile jumps over desert and the jumping over mountains lark.

stonejedi

iTrader: (51)

Yeah I guess something like that.

Brun

Yep - the latest Spider-Man is crap! Not sure why they would re-write how he "became" only 10 years after the first Toby film and then proceed to make it average at best!

the shreksta

iTrader: (20)

i will do, according to mrs shrek we have it on dvd (i have about 1000 so dont really know what ive got) will have a look 2moro

stonejedi

iTrader: (51)

CharlySkunkWeed

iTrader: (7)

As my dad said at the time (god rest his sole) . . . . .

"its a bit far-fetched".

I said it was always kinda going to be far-fetched ,what with it being about a giant green monster but i knew what he meant.

It makes me laugh everytime i see it for that reason.

BULLITT

Geek on; In the comics the Hulk was always able to jump for miles, he has unlimited strength and ability and the more angry he gets the stronger, and bigger, he gets. Hence why in the Eric Banner version, the Hulk's size varied in each situation. So him being chased and having missiles fired at him would make him angry enough to be able to run so fast and jump for so long. Geek off.

stonejedi

iTrader: (51)

And keep it off Lol.you are correct though but it was still crap.

jef

iTrader: (13)

dont know bout spierman, but parts of both hulks were.... incredible!!

one where he was attacked by monster dogs - as 1 bit into his trap he got so angry the muscle grew so quick it then proceeded to break the dogs jaw!!!! awsome - thats what the hulk is all about, driven angrier by aggressive action against him.

the othe hulk with ed norton was great - but just because i fcking love the hulk - my all time top superhero!! bending tank turrets and smashing tanks into the ground - thats the true hulk!!! love it

spidey, superman, batman, wolverene can all just suck the hulks d*ck tbh

secretley i know the secret behind the hulks power, its a mix of 100mg testosterone propionate 3 x weekly, 100mg masteron propionate 3 x weekly and 3 x 100mg trenbolone acetete weekly, plus and oral kickstart of 50mg of thai oxymethelone for first few weeks. what makes it work so quickly is the addition of 10iu;s of growth hormone/100mcg of igf1-lr3 and a secret blend of myostatin inhibitors - he knows all the tricks lol

stonejedi

iTrader: (51)

Another hulk fan

An0n0m0us

I thought the new spiderman was being played by Andy Murray when I started watching it. Cr4p compared to the original ones. As for the Hulk, the one in Avengers is spot on and thought played brilliantly. Just reminds me so much of the original series which is exactly what it should do.

CharlySkunkWeed

iTrader: (7)

I bet u loved the tv series then , some mussley guy with naff green make-up and a fuzzy wig !