I did have a lot of respect for this guy, but what an absolute hypercritical **** head he really is..

Last time i looked, the bible also forbid adulterers and bodily tattoos, you f**king tit. It is just ridiculous what religion can convince people to think

http://www.examiner.com/article/pacq...-s-words-first

 

Many would also disagree to a man knocking lumps out of another man

 

Religion or no religion, I still think that it is not natural.

 

Its got nothing to do with religion, Homosexuality just aint natural,

 

That is quite an outdated view you two have. Do you think blacks and women should be afforded the same rights as white men? You are on the wrong side of history

 

It would appear to be natural for some people.

Never understand why it would bother anyone how people choose to live their lives......far worse things out there to worry about

 

Many black Africans have very strong anti gay views, so do many women, it has nothing to do with history, does being in the 21st century alter your man body design to accept a ***** stuck up it waste disposal exit ?

 

That isn't quite the same though is it?

Black people and women should be seen as equal as they are no less that the rest of us.

Sexual preference should be male/female. Anything else isn't natural no matter how much anyone says "modern society".

 

how the **** can a man with those thoughts have gotten any power? political or otherwise?

weve to, fear god, and "just beleive" lol what a total lunatic!!

 

How is it unnatural? You're mistaking "natural" when you actually mean prejudice. Homosexuality in the animal kingdom is quite common.

Either way, I wouldn't argue with Pacquiao!!

 

So you are actually saying say gay people should not have the same rights as everyone else and that they are beneath you, as in you have the moral authority over them.

Bloody hell.

 

Who cares really?

 

Not sure why it isnt natrual, you shove your chap in a suitable orifice when it is erect, jiggle it back and forth and the resistance stimulates the nerve endings and eventually you ejaculate, gay or straight, regardless of whether it appeals or not it would work, straight **** stars do Gay **** which I find a bit strange but they do, if you had a gun at your head I suspect you might be able to manage it. If we were mentioning giving your missus some attention int his area there would be lots of mentions of when we got our "Brown Wings" and hearty back slapping, that isnt really any different in terms of the mechanics of it. my point is you make the choice by what visually stimulates you, the business end doesnt really care, it just isnt that clever and anyway I dont think being gay is entirely 24 hours a day having **** sex, I dont think all gay men actually partake according to the gay chaps I have met.

I dont know why people cant accept that some blokes like blokes and some ladies like other ladies, I think fragile male ego's like to distance themselves from it by making statements like thinking Gays should be killed, are we meant to think that this fella is so manly and straight, so sure of his credentials he would take a test to confirm his heterosexual credentials that would mean he is shot through the head if found he is gay, wow, he must be really really straight but actually it makes me more suspicious as to why he would feel so passionately about someone elses sex life.

I just reckon if a bloke likes men as much as I like women, whats the point of him conforming to the norm, it isnt like we are short of people breeding and need to draft gays in to help us straight people out. It is only one aspect of a person, the rest is the same, you get some unpleasant gay people same as straight ones and the reverse situation.

 

yes and yes

 

im with gear head and the rest. its obviously mechanically possible as you've meticulously and graphically pointed out j4cko , but the way we are designed biologically suggests otherwise to me imo. not saying that homo's should be treated differently, or have less rights or anything, but i don't think its "normal".
Why would you want to put your end in a hairy ****ty hole when you can pot the pink instead ?!

 

My post doesn't say any of that.

The analogy used was that abuse of black people and not allowing women to vote until the turn of the last century was in the same tone as intolerance to gay people. It isn't the same.

I'll retract the "natural" statement as I agree it goes on in all species.

Frankly, if someone is gay it doesn't really bother me but I'm not prepared to accept wholeheartedly just because society says I am supposed to.

 

Fine example - why should two homosexuals be allowed to adopt a child?

 

I think the point is Truss, they see, as a rule the alternative to their preference with as much distaste as we see to our alternative, lets face it you arent really going to (appreciate it isnt so bad these days) go through all the agro of coming out if you really fancy women.

I know what I like, I am secure in that (as the sysadmin who has access to my internet history at work will attest ) so I have no hangups, I dont want to see it in action but if gay chaps enjoy it then more power to them, blokes arent quite as fussy as women so I reckon they get loads more sex than most straight blokes if so inclined, if I had been a fancier of chaps I would have been down the gay village like a Rat up a drainpipe with a cheery "by the way Mum, im gay" on the way out, if any of my three lads "bats for the other side" I am not going to waste any time on "getting used to it" or doing any disowning, life is too short, rarely goes how you want or expect and is never perfect, if you wait for that to happen you will die dissapointed.

 

So my view has to the same as yours?

Why can't I hold the view that gay relationships are not natural without being branded a racist?

Typical do-gooder attitude.

 

some find it OK.

Never ceases to amaze me how some people hide behind and twist religion to suit their own ends...

 

fair comment j4cko, can't really disagree with you! What people do is up to them, i can't see why people do it, but hey.
That newspaper page cannot be for real...

 

It is real, Nigerian I believe.

Quite common out there as homosexuality is illegal!

I really couldn't care what two guys get up to, but I will not be told that they should be able to marry and adopt children.

The human race has developed and evolved through male/female relationships producing offspring and raising a family. Nothing will change that fact.

 

"downloading his sperm into my butt" If only we had such candid news reporting over here.

 

Homophobia is like racism, it is a form of bigotry, you are branding people who are gay, unnatural (a word used to describe vampires and such like) and so you are seeking to dehumanise them and so reduce there worth as humans so deny them equal rights.

If you really think about it, it is shocking behavior.

Who was that women a few weeks back saying that gay couples should not be allowed to bring up a child? Anyway, it came out she was a single parent, the farther had left her before the child was born and she hadn't had a stable relationship since. So it is not ok for two men/women to bring a child up, but ok for lone parents?! Makes no sence.

 

You're just scared of getting bummed. Don't worry you're not John Travolta's type. Relax.

 

You sound like you might be in denial. Did anything happen to you? Perhaps in Sunday School?

 

There is no such thing as a gay gay man.

 

nothing that happens is un-natural,

if it was, it wouldnt happen.

whats the problem with gays? ive got a problem with some peoples veiws and personalities, but its not restricted to a race/sexual preferance or religion.

things i dont agree with may be more prevelant in certain groups of humans, but it cant be a blanket generalisation.

why is being a bender or a bean such a problem? aslong as they conform to my interpretation of generally acceptable moral behaviour, i dont really give a fck what people do tbh

 

Manny Pacquiao, obviously. Do keep up.

 

Hands up! Who's a gayer on here then