"Vigilante" Victim Freed
#3
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: My turbo blows, air lots of it!!
Posts: 9,073
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#4
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Weston Super Mare, Somerset.
Posts: 14,102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Wrong. This guy went way over the top and not even on his property. So where do you draw the line?
Current rules are OK which seems to mean that you can kick the **** out of an intruder in your house but try not to kill him. "He came at me with a knife officer". But there has to be a limit.
dl
Current rules are OK which seems to mean that you can kick the **** out of an intruder in your house but try not to kill him. "He came at me with a knife officer". But there has to be a limit.
dl
#6
Wrong. This guy went way over the top and not even on his property. So where do you draw the line
I'd normally agree. If he'd discovered a burglar who then fled, chased him down the street and beaten him with a bat, you could say thats a bit extreme. In this case it appears that Munir along with his family were tied up and the burglars threatened to kill.
So put yourself in that position, if, as in Mr Hussain's case, you got the chance at retribution. I know for a fact that if I were in identical circumstances, the burglar(s) wouldn't just be injured, they'd be dead.
I firmly believe that you should be able to defend your property with whatever force is necessary, if an intruder has made the choice to enter your house illegally then you should have the choice to respond in whatever way you see fit.
#7
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (40)
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Marlow, Bucks.
Posts: 6,106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'd normally agree. If he'd discovered a burglar who then fled, chased him down the street and beaten him with a bat, you could say thats a bit extreme. In this case it appears that Munir along with his family were tied up and the burglars threatened to kill.
So put yourself in that position, if, as in Mr Hussain's case, you got the chance at retribution. I know for a fact that if I were in identical circumstances, the burglar(s) wouldn't just be injured, they'd be dead.
I firmly believe that you should be able to defend your property with whatever force is necessary, if an intruder has made the choice to enter your house illegally then you should have the choice to respond in whatever way you see fit.
So put yourself in that position, if, as in Mr Hussain's case, you got the chance at retribution. I know for a fact that if I were in identical circumstances, the burglar(s) wouldn't just be injured, they'd be dead.
I firmly believe that you should be able to defend your property with whatever force is necessary, if an intruder has made the choice to enter your house illegally then you should have the choice to respond in whatever way you see fit.
A fair result to a crazy case.
Trending Topics
#8
Scooby Regular
You can't take the law into your own hands. Simple reason for this is where do you draw the line?
I think letting him go under appeal was probably the right reason but this case needed highlighting to point out that although you can and should defend youself, there is a point where defence turns into revenge/punishment which should be frowned upon.
#9
Scooby Senior
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: West Yorks.
Posts: 4,130
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Wrong. This guy went way over the top and not even on his property. So where do you draw the line?
Current rules are OK which seems to mean that you can kick the **** out of an intruder in your house but try not to kill him. "He came at me with a knife officer". But there has to be a limit.
dl
Current rules are OK which seems to mean that you can kick the **** out of an intruder in your house but try not to kill him. "He came at me with a knife officer". But there has to be a limit.
dl
#10
Scooby Regular
freed on appeal -- as I predicted on the eariler thread re this topic
the law is perfectly sound as it stands and no need to give vigilanties a charter to kill
the law is perfectly sound as it stands and no need to give vigilanties a charter to kill
#11
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Pleiades
Posts: 1,294
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think it is easy to say what you would and wouldn't do in a similar situation when you are calmly sitting at your keyboard.
People under extreme stress aren't always thinking rationally and once adrenaline kicks in they can act in ways they wouldn't normally dream of. Equally people who say they would kill someone who broke into their home might find they are just sitting there wetting their pants.
People under extreme stress aren't always thinking rationally and once adrenaline kicks in they can act in ways they wouldn't normally dream of. Equally people who say they would kill someone who broke into their home might find they are just sitting there wetting their pants.
#13
Then you would and should go to jail.
#14
Scooby Regular
#15
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Weston Super Mare, Somerset.
Posts: 14,102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think it is easy to say what you would and wouldn't do in a similar situation when you are calmly sitting at your keyboard.
People under extreme stress aren't always thinking rationally and once adrenaline kicks in they can act in ways they wouldn't normally dream of. Equally people who say they would kill someone who broke into their home might find they are just sitting there wetting their pants.
People under extreme stress aren't always thinking rationally and once adrenaline kicks in they can act in ways they wouldn't normally dream of. Equally people who say they would kill someone who broke into their home might find they are just sitting there wetting their pants.
I am fairly sure that if I caught someone who had just raped my wife or daughter I would completely lose it and kill them or do them some serious damage in a wild rage.
Doesn't make it right though.
dl
#16
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Poole - in an Isuzu D-Max LE (Prodrive Version) Gamer Tag "Coin Slot"
Posts: 1,485
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Good news, maybe that will make a few scumbags think twice before entering somebody elses property and making threats to kill.
#17
That's how it should be, in an ideal world.
A criminal loses ALL rights IMO .......
Last edited by SunnySideUp; 20 January 2010 at 01:23 PM.
#18
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Sunny BELFAST
Posts: 19,408
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
the burgler should have been killed/euthanised, he offers no value to society, he chooses to burglarise, he faces the consequences. extreme opinion i know but its how i feel. i worked hard for what i have, what right has some scummy wee **** to come in to my house an steal it from me.
#20
Owner of SNet
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Berkshire
Posts: 11,513
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Boo
TX.
TX.
Wrong. This guy went way over the top and not even on his property. So where do you draw the line?
Current rules are OK which seems to mean that you can kick the **** out of an intruder in your house but try not to kill him. "He came at me with a knife officer". But there has to be a limit.
dl
Current rules are OK which seems to mean that you can kick the **** out of an intruder in your house but try not to kill him. "He came at me with a knife officer". But there has to be a limit.
dl
#22
Scooby Regular
We don't draw the line, the Government doesn't draw the line, the Criminal REMOVES all lines when he chooses to invade my property, threaten to kill me and my family and generally be extremely agressive .... for this action I will decide where I draw the line (even if that means that I administer just punishment!).
That's how it should be, in an ideal world.
A criminal loses ALL rights IMO .......
That's how it should be, in an ideal world.
A criminal loses ALL rights IMO .......
Pete,
For one we are in complete agreement
The right to defend ones family and home should be absolute, irrespective of whether the party in question is entering, present, or leaving.
This is one area that I believe the Yanks have got it right.
#23
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Sheffield; Rome of the North
Posts: 17,582
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I believe that he has been lucky. He has mitigating circumstances in his favour, but no defence.
When you remove the emotive 'if it was my house/family/children/property' element from this youre left with a man who tracked down and beat half to death, a burglar who had broken in to his house earlier.
Theres no element of self defence here, only revenge and support from people who are p*ssed off with the way that the country is going.
The trouble is that if this was allowed to pass and became the norm then we would all be f*cked. Surely thats obvious?
In the same situation I might have acted in a similar fashion, who knows? I do know that I wouldnt expect to get away with it though...
When you remove the emotive 'if it was my house/family/children/property' element from this youre left with a man who tracked down and beat half to death, a burglar who had broken in to his house earlier.
Theres no element of self defence here, only revenge and support from people who are p*ssed off with the way that the country is going.
The trouble is that if this was allowed to pass and became the norm then we would all be f*cked. Surely thats obvious?
In the same situation I might have acted in a similar fashion, who knows? I do know that I wouldnt expect to get away with it though...
#24
Scooby Regular
When you remove the emotive 'if it was my house/family/children/property' element from this you're left with a man who tracked down and beat half to death, a nasty little **** with no social or moral standards who didn't deserve to live and who had evidenced this by having broken in to his house earlier and tied him and his family up, and threatened to kill them. Chances are the liitle bsatard would have probably got a few hours community service if the "law" had dealt with it.
#25
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Doncaster
Posts: 896
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hypothetically then:
Bloke has a car crash, hits a tree and his family are all trapped and badly injured.
He has no mobile phone and comes and knocks on your door, as it's the onlu house close by.
There's nobody in so he breaks in to use the telephone, as he's on his way back out you return home and kill him.
Justified?
#26
Scooby Regular
Hypothetically then:
Bloke has a car crash, hits a tree and his family are all trapped and badly injured.
He has no mobile phone and comes and knocks on your door, as it's the onlu house close by.
There's nobody in so he breaks in to use the telephone, as he's on his way back out you return home and kill him.
Justified?
Bloke has a car crash, hits a tree and his family are all trapped and badly injured.
He has no mobile phone and comes and knocks on your door, as it's the onlu house close by.
There's nobody in so he breaks in to use the telephone, as he's on his way back out you return home and kill him.
Justified?
But running with your thought process (however unlikely it may be), its a completely different scenario to the one in question. Presumably bloke would have explained position and his predicament would be apparent. He wouldn't be running away from me, or acting with menace for a start.
#27
For once, and on this occassion only I agree with DD above ...... it will be quite clear that the gentleman was in dire need of a telephone, it will be clear what his motives are.
That is COMPLETLY different to a burglar, who looks you in the eye and says that he will kill you and your family unless he gets what you worked hard for!! You find him, you beat the sh1te out of him, job done - no need for police, judges, lawyers or cost!!
It should be law that a criminal loses all rights when committing a crime and for all time afterwards. We really need to stamp down on the assumption that criminals and scum have rights!!
That is COMPLETLY different to a burglar, who looks you in the eye and says that he will kill you and your family unless he gets what you worked hard for!! You find him, you beat the sh1te out of him, job done - no need for police, judges, lawyers or cost!!
It should be law that a criminal loses all rights when committing a crime and for all time afterwards. We really need to stamp down on the assumption that criminals and scum have rights!!
#28
Scooby Regular
For once, and on this occassion only I agree with DD above ...... it will be quite clear that the gentleman was in dire need of a telephone, it will be clear what his motives are.
That is COMPLETLY different to a burglar, who looks you in the eye and says that he will kill you and your family unless he gets what you worked hard for!! You find him, you beat the sh1te out of him, job done - no need for police, judges, lawyers or cost!!
It should be law that a criminal loses all rights when committing a crime and for all time afterwards. We really need to stamp down on the assumption that criminals and scum have rights!!
That is COMPLETLY different to a burglar, who looks you in the eye and says that he will kill you and your family unless he gets what you worked hard for!! You find him, you beat the sh1te out of him, job done - no need for police, judges, lawyers or cost!!
It should be law that a criminal loses all rights when committing a crime and for all time afterwards. We really need to stamp down on the assumption that criminals and scum have rights!!
**** me - two sensible posts