Luton protesters found guilty and yet walk free
12 January 2010, 10:54 AM
#1
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Disco, Disco!
Posts: 21,825
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Luton military home-coming march - protesters found guilty and yet walk free
I have managed to drag my knuckles off of the floor long enough to find this Gem.
Now i know it cannot be true and must be a lie Because Martin 2005 and Trout tell me the DM is for idiots and fascists - that'll be me then
Muslims who called British soldiers 'rapists', 'cowards' and 'scum' were exercising freedom of speech, court hears | Mail Online
Glad they where found guilty, shame they did not get put away but that is British justice for you.
Can anyone explain tha if they hate the British way of life and want to change it, and we are told that this will never happen then why do they stay here, what could possibly be the reason(s)
I understand from Martin 2005 that the UK has the worse benefits system in Europe so cannot be for that reason, naughty DM, lying to me again!
And no this is not aimed at all Muslims, just those who agree with this sort of protest and find themselves at odds with the UK, laws and way of life.
If anyone feels the need to mention the chavsum and rubbish of this country as justfiication (or misdirection even) then i would happily force them to work and contribute to this country and stick them in borstals/labour camps if they misbehave.
BNP/EDL - if they misbehave and spread hatered then lock them up as well, or at least give them a smack on the hand and a pittance of a fine, seems only fair. I do not need them to fight my battles in my name or in the name of the English.
Now off to get dressed, where is my union jack tee-shirt and 'No1' clippers??? me and the Pitbull are off to savage a few wogs...
Now i know it cannot be true and must be a lie Because Martin 2005 and Trout tell me the DM is for idiots and fascists - that'll be me then
Muslims who called British soldiers 'rapists', 'cowards' and 'scum' were exercising freedom of speech, court hears | Mail Online
Glad they where found guilty, shame they did not get put away but that is British justice for you.
Can anyone explain tha if they hate the British way of life and want to change it, and we are told that this will never happen then why do they stay here, what could possibly be the reason(s)
I understand from Martin 2005 that the UK has the worse benefits system in Europe so cannot be for that reason, naughty DM, lying to me again!
And no this is not aimed at all Muslims, just those who agree with this sort of protest and find themselves at odds with the UK, laws and way of life.
If anyone feels the need to mention the chavsum and rubbish of this country as justfiication (or misdirection even
) then i would happily force them to work and contribute to this country and stick them in borstals/labour camps if they misbehave.BNP/EDL - if they misbehave and spread hatered then lock them up as well, or at least give them a smack on the hand and a pittance of a fine, seems only fair
. I do not need them to fight my battles in my name or in the name of the English.Now off to get dressed, where is my union jack tee-shirt and 'No1' clippers??? me and the Pitbull are off to savage a few wogs...
Last edited by The Zohan; 12 January 2010 at 11:12 AM.
12 January 2010, 11:15 AM
#2
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Central Scotland
Posts: 3,687
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I love the hypocrisy here.
They claim freedom of speech yet outside are holding a banner saying 'freedom can go to hell'
Such a delightful group of people. Time to start deporting this lot and their ilk to the many uninhabited rocks around the north of scotland.
5t.
They claim freedom of speech yet outside are holding a banner saying 'freedom can go to hell'
Such a delightful group of people. Time to start deporting this lot and their ilk to the many uninhabited rocks around the north of scotland.
5t.
12 January 2010, 11:37 AM
#4
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: France
Posts: 1,695
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
They say British troops killing Muslims in there home land why dont they f*ck off back to it then and defend it there if they feel strongly.
I think its disgusting should be given maximum penalty available
A bullet would be my choice
I think its disgusting should be given maximum penalty available
A bullet would be my choice
12 January 2010, 12:24 PM
#5
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Si hoc legere scis numium eruditionis habes
Posts: 1,383
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The scum of the Islamic society , if they want Islam they should sling their hook and find it elsewhere cause its not wanted here 
12 January 2010, 12:39 PM
#6
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 39,877
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You only have to look at Paul Hapgood's link to see that they are preaching sedition and violence-nothing less. That is against the law!
If these weak kneed PC plonking judges are allowed to continue with their attitude towards this kind of behaviour, it will get worse and worse of course until there is a pitched battle bordering on civil war.
Time we had a real leader who has the bottle to take hold of the country and is prepared to defend it and our culture and traditions.
Les
If these weak kneed PC plonking judges are allowed to continue with their attitude towards this kind of behaviour, it will get worse and worse of course until there is a pitched battle bordering on civil war.
Time we had a real leader who has the bottle to take hold of the country and is prepared to defend it and our culture and traditions.
Les
12 January 2010, 12:41 PM
#7
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: My turbo blows, air lots of it!!
Posts: 9,073
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have managed to drag my knuckles off of the floor long enough to find this Gem.
Now i know it cannot be true and must be a lie Because Martin 2005 and Trout tell me the DM is for idiots and fascists - that'll be me then
Muslims who called British soldiers 'rapists', 'cowards' and 'scum' were exercising freedom of speech, court hears | Mail Online
Now i know it cannot be true and must be a lie Because Martin 2005 and Trout tell me the DM is for idiots and fascists - that'll be me then
Muslims who called British soldiers 'rapists', 'cowards' and 'scum' were exercising freedom of speech, court hears | Mail Online
personally I can these lot of fanatics causing a load of problems yet with there fcuked up stupid religion, if they dont like it here or like they way we live why not more back to the holes they crawled out of to come here in the first place
Islam4uk can kiss my hoop!
^^LoL^^
Trending Topics
12 January 2010, 12:59 PM
#8
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Type 25. Build No.34
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have managed to drag my knuckles off of the floor long enough to find this Gem.
Now i know it cannot be true and must be a lie Because Martin 2005 and Trout tell me the DM is for idiots and fascists - that'll be me then
Muslims who called British soldiers 'rapists', 'cowards' and 'scum' were exercising freedom of speech, court hears | Mail Online
Glad they where found guilty, shame they did not get put away but that is British justice for you.
Can anyone explain tha if they hate the British way of life and want to change it, and we are told that this will never happen then why do they stay here, what could possibly be the reason(s)
I understand from Martin 2005 that the UK has the worse benefits system in Europe so cannot be for that reason, naughty DM, lying to me again!
And no this is not aimed at all Muslims, just those who agree with this sort of protest and find themselves at odds with the UK, laws and way of life.
If anyone feels the need to mention the chavsum and rubbish of this country as justfiication (or misdirection even) then i would happily force them to work and contribute to this country and stick them in borstals/labour camps if they misbehave.
BNP/EDL - if they misbehave and spread hatered then lock them up as well, or at least give them a smack on the hand and a pittance of a fine, seems only fair. I do not need them to fight my battles in my name or in the name of the English.
Now off to get dressed, where is my union jack tee-shirt and 'No1' clippers??? me and the Pitbull are off to savage a few wogs...
Now i know it cannot be true and must be a lie Because Martin 2005 and Trout tell me the DM is for idiots and fascists - that'll be me then
Muslims who called British soldiers 'rapists', 'cowards' and 'scum' were exercising freedom of speech, court hears | Mail Online
Glad they where found guilty, shame they did not get put away but that is British justice for you.
Can anyone explain tha if they hate the British way of life and want to change it, and we are told that this will never happen then why do they stay here, what could possibly be the reason(s)
I understand from Martin 2005 that the UK has the worse benefits system in Europe so cannot be for that reason, naughty DM, lying to me again!
And no this is not aimed at all Muslims, just those who agree with this sort of protest and find themselves at odds with the UK, laws and way of life.
If anyone feels the need to mention the chavsum and rubbish of this country as justfiication (or misdirection even
) then i would happily force them to work and contribute to this country and stick them in borstals/labour camps if they misbehave.BNP/EDL - if they misbehave and spread hatered then lock them up as well, or at least give them a smack on the hand and a pittance of a fine, seems only fair
. I do not need them to fight my battles in my name or in the name of the English.Now off to get dressed, where is my union jack tee-shirt and 'No1' clippers??? me and the Pitbull are off to savage a few wogs...
12 January 2010, 01:02 PM
#9
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: www.Surreyscoobies.co.uk
Posts: 2,768
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think due to there history they didnt get custodial. I know its rubbish but in the eyes of the law they are guilty of a POA and for this the punishment is what they got if they are not known to police.
The circumstances of the offense are only used to establish the offense and do not have an influence on the sentence.
Now I know this is rubbish, and along with many other people I would have liked to see them locked up but in order to prove we are right, and to prove that the democracy in this country is right we have to accept that they get treated the same as anyone who is guilty of a POA. This understanding makes us infinitely better.
The bit that made me laugh was the after hearing statement when they said "This makes a mockery of democracy" and then later said "we will not stop until we have achieved sharia law in the UK"...... No mention of a referendum there boys....I dont think a democratic society is going to go for sharia law.
(POA = legal jargon for a public order offense)
The circumstances of the offense are only used to establish the offense and do not have an influence on the sentence.
Now I know this is rubbish, and along with many other people I would have liked to see them locked up but in order to prove we are right, and to prove that the democracy in this country is right we have to accept that they get treated the same as anyone who is guilty of a POA. This understanding makes us infinitely better.
The bit that made me laugh was the after hearing statement when they said "This makes a mockery of democracy" and then later said "we will not stop until we have achieved sharia law in the UK"...... No mention of a referendum there boys....I dont think a democratic society is going to go for sharia law.
(POA = legal jargon for a public order offense)
Last edited by Timwinner; 12 January 2010 at 01:04 PM. Reason: I was ranting in work talk
12 January 2010, 01:10 PM
#10
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: A big town with sh1t shops: Northampton
Posts: 21,366
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
We should be worried. Well, for our children anyway.
I won't go into too much detail, but birthrate is something that is worrying. Anyone who has a good set of moral standards and a job should be having kids, otherwise this country is in a mess. I've said it before, go out and multiply, otherwise they'll be a swing in who is in the minorities, i.e. good, honest, hardworking etc.
I won't go into too much detail, but birthrate is something that is worrying. Anyone who has a good set of moral standards and a job should be having kids, otherwise this country is in a mess. I've said it before, go out and multiply, otherwise they'll be a swing in who is in the minorities, i.e. good, honest, hardworking etc.
12 January 2010, 02:00 PM
#13
Owner of SNet
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Berkshire
Posts: 11,513
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Agreed albeit China have got it spot on ie less is more.
TX.
TX.
We should be worried. Well, for our children anyway.
I won't go into too much detail, but birthrate is something that is worrying. Anyone who has a good set of moral standards and a job should be having kids, otherwise this country is in a mess. I've said it before, go out and multiply, otherwise they'll be a swing in who is in the minorities, i.e. good, honest, hardworking etc.
I won't go into too much detail, but birthrate is something that is worrying. Anyone who has a good set of moral standards and a job should be having kids, otherwise this country is in a mess. I've said it before, go out and multiply, otherwise they'll be a swing in who is in the minorities, i.e. good, honest, hardworking etc.
12 January 2010, 03:28 PM
#14
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Weston Super Mare, Somerset.
Posts: 14,102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think they should be deported. There is probaly some legal reason why this can't happen but I say just do it and change the law ASAP to get rid of them, or lock them up until we can. dl
12 January 2010, 03:35 PM
#15
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: At the diesel pump...
Posts: 8,677
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Mind you, since he has already been in court on terrorism charges, he's probably keeping a very low profile.
12 January 2010, 03:46 PM
#17
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Central Scotland
Posts: 3,687
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hence my thought on putting them all on a rock somewhere so they can make the seagulls adopt sharia law but technically haven't been sent out of the UK...
5t.
12 January 2010, 04:32 PM
#18
Guest
Posts: n/a
My view here is, as on another thread, they can *say* what they like as we do live in a democracy and there is supposed 'freedom of speech'. The fact that this case came to court has given them more publicity than they would otherwise have had, Likewise, it has highlighted *differences* between various parts of society which, if ignored, means we all live together quite happily (for the most part). Get rid of all these *equality* quangos and you'll find that a lot of this so-called *tension* will disappear. The politicians have to find ways to keep people at each others throats so they have more control!
With these particular *gentlemen* then they should be a) investigated over their welfare claims/benefits as it's obvious that if they're protesting then they are not looking for work (the fact that they are in receipt of such claims and whether that right should be there for them or anyone else is another argument for another time) and b) if they are not British citizens then they should be deported immediately as their presence is *contrary to the public good* or whatever the legal phrasing is. Yuman rites don't come into it!
Dave
With these particular *gentlemen* then they should be a) investigated over their welfare claims/benefits as it's obvious that if they're protesting then they are not looking for work (the fact that they are in receipt of such claims and whether that right should be there for them or anyone else is another argument for another time) and b) if they are not British citizens then they should be deported immediately as their presence is *contrary to the public good* or whatever the legal phrasing is. Yuman rites don't come into it!
Dave
12 January 2010, 06:56 PM
#20
Scooby Senior
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: West Midlands
Posts: 5,763
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So all five are currently on benefits, but i notice that Jalal Ahmed used to have a part-time job as a baggage handler at Luton airport!! 
How on earth can a (pathetic excuse of a) man who wants to destroy the west and implement his own beliefs (by whatever means) get a job on the air-side loading stuff into the hold of aeroplanes? Meanwhile innocent passengers can't carry a pair of tweezers, a bottle of water and are soon to be photographed naked in the cause of anti-terrorism
mb
How on earth can a (pathetic excuse of a) man who wants to destroy the west and implement his own beliefs (by whatever means) get a job on the air-side loading stuff into the hold of aeroplanes? Meanwhile innocent passengers can't carry a pair of tweezers, a bottle of water and are soon to be photographed naked in the cause of anti-terrorism
mb
12 January 2010, 07:04 PM
#22
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Disco, Disco!
Posts: 21,825
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
12 January 2010, 08:28 PM
#26
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Type 25. Build No.34
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My view here is, as on another thread, they can *say* what they like as we do live in a democracy and there is supposed 'freedom of speech'. The fact that this case came to court has given them more publicity than they would otherwise have had, Likewise, it has highlighted *differences* between various parts of society which, if ignored, means we all live together quite happily (for the most part). Get rid of all these *equality* quangos and you'll find that a lot of this so-called *tension* will disappear. The politicians have to find ways to keep people at each others throats so they have more control!
With these particular *gentlemen* then they should be a) investigated over their welfare claims/benefits as it's obvious that if they're protesting then they are not looking for work (the fact that they are in receipt of such claims and whether that right should be there for them or anyone else is another argument for another time) and b) if they are not British citizens then they should be deported immediately as their presence is *contrary to the public good* or whatever the legal phrasing is. Yuman rites don't come into it!
Dave
With these particular *gentlemen* then they should be a) investigated over their welfare claims/benefits as it's obvious that if they're protesting then they are not looking for work (the fact that they are in receipt of such claims and whether that right should be there for them or anyone else is another argument for another time) and b) if they are not British citizens then they should be deported immediately as their presence is *contrary to the public good* or whatever the legal phrasing is. Yuman rites don't come into it!
Dave
Are you going all 'moderate' on me?
12 January 2010, 10:00 PM
#27
SN Fairy Godmother
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Far Far Away
Posts: 35,246
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I don't usually get involved in these type of threads, but must admit to being horrified by the lunatics.
This comment (The men, all of whom are on benefits, were each ordered to pay £500 in costs towards the prosecution. Outside the court, they defiantly declared: 'The taxpayer paid for this court case. The taxpayer will pay for the fines too out of benefits'.) along with saying this (saying they wanted to see sharia law in Britain.) makes me think they are not here for any other reason than to get easy money leaving them with plenty of time to stir up trouble.
These extremists need to be removed from our Country, other Countries do it, so why can't we.
We don't want them or their sharia law.
I feel if something isn't done soon, by the proper authorities to get rid of these sponging extremist halfwits, some folks might just start to take the law into their own hands and deal with it themselves
This comment (The men, all of whom are on benefits, were each ordered to pay £500 in costs towards the prosecution. Outside the court, they defiantly declared: 'The taxpayer paid for this court case. The taxpayer will pay for the fines too out of benefits'.) along with saying this (saying they wanted to see sharia law in Britain.) makes me think they are not here for any other reason than to get easy money leaving them with plenty of time to stir up trouble.
These extremists need to be removed from our Country, other Countries do it, so why can't we.
We don't want them or their sharia law.
I feel if something isn't done soon, by the proper authorities to get rid of these sponging extremist halfwits, some folks might just start to take the law into their own hands and deal with it themselves
12 January 2010, 10:06 PM
#28
I don't usually get involved in these type of threads, but must admit to being horrified by the lunatics.
This comment (The men, all of whom are on benefits, were each ordered to pay £500 in costs towards the prosecution. Outside the court, they defiantly declared: 'The taxpayer paid for this court case. The taxpayer will pay for the fines too out of benefits'.) along with saying this (saying they wanted to see sharia law in Britain.) makes me think they are not here for any other reason than to get easy money leaving them with plenty of time to stir up trouble.
These extremists need to be removed from our Country, other Countries do it, so why can't we.
We don't want them or their sharia law.
I feel if something isn't done soon, by the proper authorities to get rid of these sponging extremist halfwits, some folks might just start to take the law into their own hands and deal with it themselves
This comment (The men, all of whom are on benefits, were each ordered to pay £500 in costs towards the prosecution. Outside the court, they defiantly declared: 'The taxpayer paid for this court case. The taxpayer will pay for the fines too out of benefits'.) along with saying this (saying they wanted to see sharia law in Britain.) makes me think they are not here for any other reason than to get easy money leaving them with plenty of time to stir up trouble.
These extremists need to be removed from our Country, other Countries do it, so why can't we.
We don't want them or their sharia law.
I feel if something isn't done soon, by the proper authorities to get rid of these sponging extremist halfwits, some folks might just start to take the law into their own hands and deal with it themselves
