Saw this in the paper today
#1
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: london
Posts: 615
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Saw this in the paper today
On-spot fines for drivers involved in small shunts | News
it seems the government isn't making enough money from the Congestion Charge or Speed cameras anymore so are thinking of new ways to getting even more money out of us.
it seems the government isn't making enough money from the Congestion Charge or Speed cameras anymore so are thinking of new ways to getting even more money out of us.
#3
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: On the PC, sipping a beer and listing to old skool choons :)
Posts: 10,006
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
"Because of a fall in the number of convictions for poor driving the Government is believed to want to make it easier for the police to penalise drivers"
Think im gonna get a pair of roller skates if this happens
Think im gonna get a pair of roller skates if this happens
#5
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: l'on n'y peut rien
Posts: 2,922
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I know of someone who braked on a slippery road, lost control and rolled his car down an embankment. Police arrived, no drink, drugs or other vehicles involved.
Two months later, he's charged with DWDCA.
#6
It's not just spot fines for small accidents, labour are also proposing a £60 fine and 3 points for any instance of driving without due care and attention which will include eating/drinking/smoking at the wheel, having an arguement, tuning the radio, using h/f mobile etc.
Now the police only being human and taking the easy option to make target will only have to wait up, watch everyone go by and then go and nick um. They will be able to make a full time living out of it. I mean how many people do you see every day doing this kind of thing and let's be honest we've all been guilty of some of the examples given at one time or another.
It's just another labour stealth tax to screw more money out of the motorist.
Now the police only being human and taking the easy option to make target will only have to wait up, watch everyone go by and then go and nick um. They will be able to make a full time living out of it. I mean how many people do you see every day doing this kind of thing and let's be honest we've all been guilty of some of the examples given at one time or another.
It's just another labour stealth tax to screw more money out of the motorist.
Last edited by Ballistic; 25 December 2008 at 08:53 PM. Reason: spelling
#7
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
Hmmmmmmmmmm, they don't have to actually SEE it, they arrive later, look at the result, make up their own minds and someone can be prosecuted.
I know of someone who braked on a slippery road, lost control and rolled his car down an embankment. Police arrived, no drink, drugs or other vehicles involved.
Two months later, he's charged with DWDCA.
I know of someone who braked on a slippery road, lost control and rolled his car down an embankment. Police arrived, no drink, drugs or other vehicles involved.
Two months later, he's charged with DWDCA.
So in this case they'd get a lesser penalty under the new proposal than they actually likely to get?
And in twenty years I've managed to never slide off the road, no matter what the weather conditions, so DC&A would seem accurate?
M
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
28
28 December 2015 11:07 PM
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
12
18 November 2015 07:03 AM