opinions on having kids late in life versus having them early
#2
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Stroke it baby!
Posts: 33,828
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Not sure what you would call "later in life" I had my first child when I was 19, another on the way now at 28. I will hopefully have more than that dependinf on if I can afford them.
Saying that though, my first borns mum was also 19, my seconds mum will be 37 when she has her first.
Saying that though, my first borns mum was also 19, my seconds mum will be 37 when she has her first.
#5
Scooby Senior
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Next door to the WiFi connection
Posts: 16,293
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I would have liked to have had kids about 25. I always had the mind set that when I was 40 I would still be young enough to have fun and travel etc whilst the kids are old enough to look after themselves. That way youve had a decent youth yourself and plenty of time left to enjoy your wealth (presuming you have made something of yourself )
#7
Mid 30s, I guess that's late under the criteria?
Yes it has been tough balancing work with babies and I'm sure it will continue to be so, it's the nature of the beast I guess.
Yes it has been tough balancing work with babies and I'm sure it will continue to be so, it's the nature of the beast I guess.
Trending Topics
#12
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Weston Super Mare, Somerset.
Posts: 14,102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
We had 2 kids late, 39 & 40. Too late really as you take a much bigger chance with nature getting it right. Thank goodness ours were fine. I think you make better parents if you are older - more common sense for a start. And still with enough energy to cope (just)
But what really made the difference was that my wife gave up a career to stay at home and be with them 24/7. Bit of a struggle but worth it IMHO.
I suspect late 20s/early 30s is the ideal but so much depends on personal circumstances. dl
But what really made the difference was that my wife gave up a career to stay at home and be with them 24/7. Bit of a struggle but worth it IMHO.
I suspect late 20s/early 30s is the ideal but so much depends on personal circumstances. dl
#13
My friends (he 47, she 41!) have just had their first - twin boys. His life is so over
I also have another friend who is 52, wife 48 and they have a 21 year old, a 14 year old and a 4 month old... His reply when his wife said she was preggers with the unplanned 3rd was f*** off!
He's so shagged he can barely see
I also have another friend who is 52, wife 48 and they have a 21 year old, a 14 year old and a 4 month old... His reply when his wife said she was preggers with the unplanned 3rd was f*** off!
He's so shagged he can barely see
#16
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Bring back infractions!
Posts: 4,554
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
In some respects having your kids at 18 is a great idea as by the time they're 18 you're only 36. They're now independent and you are still young and have money to go a do cool stuff like travel, buy flash cars, etc.
Have your kids at 36+ and your approaching retirement by the time you've finally got them to move out. Your life is coming to an end
Unfortunately I'm in the latter boat
Have your kids at 36+ and your approaching retirement by the time you've finally got them to move out. Your life is coming to an end
Unfortunately I'm in the latter boat
#17
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Class record holder at Pembrey Llandow Goodwood MIRA Hethel Blyton Curborough Lydden and Snetterton
Posts: 8,626
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The thought of starting a family never crossed my mind as I enjoyed myself through those uni years, then with job and disposable income there was NFW I'd consider a family until I'd really enjoyed myself and sorted out my career.
Have now got 2 kids, had them at 32 and 35.
Have now got 2 kids, had them at 32 and 35.
#18
In some respects having your kids at 18 is a great idea as by the time they're 18 you're only 36. They're now independent and you are still young and have money to go a do cool stuff like travel, buy flash cars, etc.
Have your kids at 36+ and your approaching retirement by the time you've finally got them to move out. Your life is coming to an end
Unfortunately I'm in the latter boat
Have your kids at 36+ and your approaching retirement by the time you've finally got them to move out. Your life is coming to an end
Unfortunately I'm in the latter boat
if you have them earlier they have their own families to look after so you don't get your hedges and grass cut
#19
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Bring back infractions!
Posts: 4,554
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#23
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: www.Surreyscoobies.co.uk
Posts: 2,768
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'M 31 and my better looking smarter half is 26, We plan on trying in the next year or so, For me this is about as late as I want to leave it, We want two in total and I have no idea if we will run into problems etc..
I am not sure how I would have coped but looking back if I dont think, on a personal level, I was anywhere near mature enough when I was in my early 20's.
I know a bunch of people who have had them at this age and they have top kids, but for me, and the sake of the kids its best I waited.
I am not sure how I would have coped but looking back if I dont think, on a personal level, I was anywhere near mature enough when I was in my early 20's.
I know a bunch of people who have had them at this age and they have top kids, but for me, and the sake of the kids its best I waited.
#24
They always used to say that leaving it too late to have them was pushing your luck because an older person is more likely to have a child which is not perfect in health.
I would have thought that it is better to have them while you are young is better because you are better able to cope with all the hassle anyway.
Les
I would have thought that it is better to have them while you are young is better because you are better able to cope with all the hassle anyway.
Les
#27
I think I can answer this, as my lady is expecting our first.
Im 36 and expecting my first in Jan 09. My brother has two kids, 3 and 1 and they run myself and my bro mad.
Physically demands of children, well I would say have them in your late 20's, but for me, mentally I wasnt ready then. I wanted to play the field, screw my brains out and kids were the last things I wanted.
So, at 36, I feel ready for them, but when I baby sit for my bro, christ they tire me out, the little *****. Made me realise how unfit I was so have been jogging and getting fitter in readiness.
Having them latter inlife, Ive got the sports car, truck, drink, clubbing desires out ofmy system and, sad as it sounds, have loved getting the nursery ready and buy silly cute little clothes. :-) Im looking forward to it, and dont regret waiting so long.
Overall, I would say have them when your ready. There isnt a right or wrong time. Mind you saying that, my mate was born when his mum was 45 and dad was 57 !!!! He obviously lost them when he was still young and having older parents did effect him.
SBK
Im 36 and expecting my first in Jan 09. My brother has two kids, 3 and 1 and they run myself and my bro mad.
Physically demands of children, well I would say have them in your late 20's, but for me, mentally I wasnt ready then. I wanted to play the field, screw my brains out and kids were the last things I wanted.
So, at 36, I feel ready for them, but when I baby sit for my bro, christ they tire me out, the little *****. Made me realise how unfit I was so have been jogging and getting fitter in readiness.
Having them latter inlife, Ive got the sports car, truck, drink, clubbing desires out ofmy system and, sad as it sounds, have loved getting the nursery ready and buy silly cute little clothes. :-) Im looking forward to it, and dont regret waiting so long.
Overall, I would say have them when your ready. There isnt a right or wrong time. Mind you saying that, my mate was born when his mum was 45 and dad was 57 !!!! He obviously lost them when he was still young and having older parents did effect him.
SBK
Last edited by Simon K; 05 December 2008 at 03:33 PM.
#28
Guest
Posts: n/a
43 for me when the nipper was born. The lack of energy thing can be got around by staying fit! A 4 year old does help that ......... I think that having one later has you more prepared as you've gone though life seeing friends/family have all the issues/joys already so you know what to expect ... up to a point obviously !!
Dave
Dave
#29
Never wanted kids.It was the call of the 'clock' that got my wife going so at 37 we ended up having twins.
Enjoyed my 20's and mid 30's without kids though but couldn't imagine life without them now.
I still play cricket and want to see my kids playing for my club when they are older...though I'll be 50 when they are in their teens which is a bit of a downer!
Out of the choices though...later I'd say
Enjoyed my 20's and mid 30's without kids though but couldn't imagine life without them now.
I still play cricket and want to see my kids playing for my club when they are older...though I'll be 50 when they are in their teens which is a bit of a downer!
Out of the choices though...later I'd say