Notices
Non Scooby Related Anything Non-Scooby related

Employment experts

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 18 November 2008, 08:58 PM
  #1  
OllyK
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
OllyK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 12,304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Employment experts

Does anybody know the legality of asking employees to take half pay with no reduced hours for 1 month due to the company having insufficient funds?

Not the compant I work for but one that a friend works at.
Old 18 November 2008, 09:11 PM
  #2  
chocolate_o_brian
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (22)
 
chocolate_o_brian's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Doncaster, S. Yorks.
Posts: 21,415
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Total guess shot, but I'd have thought they could request for staff to volunteer this, or onvoke a 90 day rule into the contract. I say 90 days as this was what my old employers were threatening to invoke when we voted against having 4 hours notice for enforced overtime instead of 24 hours. I would assume is the same sort of thing, I.e. a contractual change.

That's all I can offer though (from personal experience).
Old 18 November 2008, 09:19 PM
  #3  
OllyK
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
OllyK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 12,304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by chocolate_o_brian
Total guess shot, but I'd have thought they could request for staff to volunteer this, or onvoke a 90 day rule into the contract. I say 90 days as this was what my old employers were threatening to invoke when we voted against having 4 hours notice for enforced overtime instead of 24 hours. I would assume is the same sort of thing, I.e. a contractual change.

That's all I can offer though (from personal experience).
I'm guessing by 90 day rule, you mean they give notice of 90 days to change of contract? Thing is they haven't got 90 days available to them. Friend is an employee there BTW, I just suspect they are getting a raw deal. Apparently redundancies aren't an option as the company can't afford to pay out the reduncancy money. I've suggested they find a new job ASAP.
Old 18 November 2008, 09:56 PM
  #4  
cossie-nutter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (45)
 
cossie-nutter's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Huntingdon Cambs
Posts: 3,989
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

it's illegal full stop!!!
Old 18 November 2008, 10:00 PM
  #5  
stevebt
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (8)
 
stevebt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 16,732
Received 33 Likes on 19 Posts
Default

Our firm has cut everyones wage down to a bare minimum, that would be the only option. Failing that automatic redunancies. Its part of the times now and I know loads who have lost thier jobs.
Old 18 November 2008, 10:06 PM
  #6  
OllyK
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
OllyK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 12,304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by stevebt
Our firm has cut everyones wage down to a bare minimum, that would be the only option. Failing that automatic redunancies. Its part of the times now and I know loads who have lost thier jobs.
In some respects redundancy would be preferable as they have redundancy cover. The other issue is that by halving their salary, they would end up earning less than the minimum wage for the the hours they work for the month in question.

Assuming my maths is correct:
£5.73 * 37.5 hours per week = £214.875
52 weeks in a year = £11,173.50

Their current salary is circa £19K.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
roysc
ScoobyNet General
2
16 September 2015 09:10 AM
The Joshua Tree
Computer & Technology Related
18
11 September 2015 09:24 PM
PeterJ
ScoobyNet General
1
24 July 2001 05:26 PM
Steve White
ScoobyNet General
6
22 February 2000 04:23 PM



Quick Reply: Employment experts



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:54 PM.