Notices
Non Scooby Related Anything Non-Scooby related

Anybody good at engineerIng calculations?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 30 October 2008, 02:56 PM
  #1  
CRAIGFIN
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
CRAIGFIN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,214
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Anybody good at engineerIng calculations?

I want to get peoples opinions on how they would work out the following sample calculation. I got the answer right, but my working out / solution was completely different from the one in the back of the answer book. The figures in brackets are powers as Scoobynet can't handle equations.

PRESENT POWER DEMANDS FROM ALL SOURCES ARE APPROX 10(12)W. WE NEED 10 TIMES THIS AMOUNT. SOLAR POWER PLANTS ARE ONLY 10% EFFICIENT. EARTH PRESENTS AN AREA OF ABOUT 10(15)M(2) (METRES SQUARED) TO THE SUN AND RECEIVES POWER AS SUNLIGHT AT ABOUT 1kWM(-2). WHAT FRACTION OF THE EARTHS SURFACE WOULD NEED TO BE DEDICATED TO POWER GENERTION IF ONLY SOLAR POWER WAS USED AS A SOURCE OF ENERGY?

The answer is 1 / 10,000. I'm interested to see how people arrive at the answer as its the route to the anwer I'd like to see.
Old 30 October 2008, 03:15 PM
  #2  
Coffin Dodger
Scooby Regular
 
Coffin Dodger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Bring back infractions!
Posts: 4,554
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Use 10^12 to express powers of, like in Excel.

What do you mean by 1kWM(-2)?
Old 30 October 2008, 03:19 PM
  #3  
AndyC_772
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
AndyC_772's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Swilling coffee at my lab bench
Posts: 9,096
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Total power demand = 10^12 W

Solar panel efficiency = 10% = 10/100 = 0.1, therefore total incident power required on solar panels to achieve present demand = (10^12) / 0.1 = 10^13 W.

The question then says that we need 10x that amount, for some reason. Assuming it's not just allowing for the inefficiency of the solar cells, that would imply that the total incident power required is 10x the above, which is 10^14 W.

Actual received power from sun = 1000 W/m2, therefore number of m2 required = 10^14 / 1000 = 10^11 m2.

Therefore, fraction of earth required to be covered = 10^11 / 10^15 = 1/10000.

Seems a bit odd that they'd suggest needing 10x enough power to meet present demand though, I think that's been included in the efficiency of the solar cells - coincidentally 10%. I think the real answer would be closer to 1/100,000.
Old 30 October 2008, 03:42 PM
  #4  
jaytc2003
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
jaytc2003's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Manchester ish
Posts: 18,547
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I agree with the above post by AndyC 772
Old 30 October 2008, 04:30 PM
  #5  
CRAIGFIN
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
CRAIGFIN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,214
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by AndyC_772
Total power demand = 10^12 W

Solar panel efficiency = 10% = 10/100 = 0.1, therefore total incident power required on solar panels to achieve present demand = (10^12) / 0.1 = 10^13 W.

The question then says that we need 10x that amount, for some reason. Assuming it's not just allowing for the inefficiency of the solar cells, that would imply that the total incident power required is 10x the above, which is 10^14 W.

Actual received power from sun = 1000 W/m2, therefore number of m2 required = 10^14 / 1000 = 10^11 m2.

Therefore, fraction of earth required to be covered = 10^11 / 10^15 = 1/10000.

Seems a bit odd that they'd suggest needing 10x enough power to meet present demand though, I think that's been included in the efficiency of the solar cells - coincidentally 10%. I think the real answer would be closer to 1/100,000.
Andy,

Thats an interesting answer. You actually start out solving it like the book does but finishing solving it the way I did it. It's like a combination of the two routes. I guess there is more than one way to skin a cat!!*

* NOTE : No actual cats were harmed during the solution to this calculation.
Old 30 October 2008, 04:33 PM
  #6  
CRAIGFIN
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
CRAIGFIN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,214
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Coffin Dodger
What do you mean by 1kWM(-2)?
One Kilowatt per metre per metre.

The - sign means "per".

Scoobynet struggles with writing mathematics
Old 30 October 2008, 04:35 PM
  #7  
Torquemada
Scooby Regular
 
Torquemada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: 'Murica
Posts: 3,676
Received 7 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Arrrggghhhh, maffs! <runs for the hills>
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Scott@ScoobySpares
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
61
11 January 2021 03:08 PM
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
33
29 August 2017 07:18 PM
Scott@ScoobySpares
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
7
14 December 2015 08:16 AM
blackandz
General Technical
0
12 September 2015 07:01 PM



Quick Reply: Anybody good at engineerIng calculations?



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:44 PM.