Jobseeker's Allowance - savings
#3
Guest
Posts: n/a
NO.
Anything over £16,000 saved i think and you get nothing until you have spent your savings.
Only fair imo.
Edit
Anything over £16,000 saved i think and you get nothing until you have spent your savings.
Only fair imo.
Edit
You'll get less if you have savings over £6,000. If you have savings over £16,000 you probably won't qualify.
If your partner or civil partner works 24 hours or more a week on average, you can't usually get income-based JSA (contribution-based JSA isn't affected). If they work less than 24 hours, it may affect how much you get.
If your partner or civil partner works 24 hours or more a week on average, you can't usually get income-based JSA (contribution-based JSA isn't affected). If they work less than 24 hours, it may affect how much you get.
Last edited by Nat; 25 July 2008 at 07:08 PM.
#5
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: 32 cylinders and many cats
Posts: 18,658
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Job Centre on the phone didn't seem to know. From what I read it looked like contribution based JSA is not means tested.
It would seem quite odd if there is no JSA at all if you have savings (even if they are from a house sale and being frugal whilst working), but you sign on anyway to get NI paid, so that if you become unemployed again you don't get anything except your NI paid... and also some notion of a state pension which will be worth nothing anyway.
It would seem quite odd if there is no JSA at all if you have savings (even if they are from a house sale and being frugal whilst working), but you sign on anyway to get NI paid, so that if you become unemployed again you don't get anything except your NI paid... and also some notion of a state pension which will be worth nothing anyway.
Trending Topics
#13
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Pleiades
Posts: 1,294
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I haven't worked in the Job Centre for a few years but this was the case previously and the basic rules don't tend to change much -
If you have paid enough NI in the last two relevant income tax years then you should get six months JSA (Contribution based), this is not affected by savings or partner working.
If you haven't paid enough NI then you can apply for JSA (Income Based) however this is affected by savings and partner working.
If you qualify for JSA (C) but are still signing on at the end of the six months then the money stops or you need to apply for JSA (IB) as above.
Having said that there are circumstances where payment in lieu of notice and final wages etc are taken into account.
If you have paid enough NI in the last two relevant income tax years then you should get six months JSA (Contribution based), this is not affected by savings or partner working.
If you haven't paid enough NI then you can apply for JSA (Income Based) however this is affected by savings and partner working.
If you qualify for JSA (C) but are still signing on at the end of the six months then the money stops or you need to apply for JSA (IB) as above.
Having said that there are circumstances where payment in lieu of notice and final wages etc are taken into account.
#14
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (6)
I think that each person should be judged on their situation. The OP for example, someone who is losing their job and have saved money over the years should not have a risk to their savings. They have been paying tax for years !! they should be entitled to keep the money they have earned and given help to survive and find a new job !
#15
There are two types - income based and contribution based. I think it is about £59.00 per week (assuming she is over 25). Income based take savings and partners income into account. Contribution based is not means tested and is based solely on the number of years NI contributions she has paid.
#16
#17
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: 32 cylinders and many cats
Posts: 18,658
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Thanks all. No Leslie, my wife had a job she loved as a new product development manager in a paper factory that has just gone into administration. She was putting out the new products and the company was in profit year to date, but the credit crunch and pulp/energy costs have shut a 160 year old local business with hundreds of jobs lost.
#18
Scooby Regular
John, can you not put the savings in your wife's name?
Redundancy is considered a compensation and therefore would not usually be included as savings or income for JSA purposes.
Employee claims through the insolvency generally should not effect benefit payments. The redundancy payments office will, however, reduce the pay in lieu of notice payment by the value of any benefits/JSA received.
HTH
Redundancy is considered a compensation and therefore would not usually be included as savings or income for JSA purposes.
Employee claims through the insolvency generally should not effect benefit payments. The redundancy payments office will, however, reduce the pay in lieu of notice payment by the value of any benefits/JSA received.
HTH
#19
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: 32 cylinders and many cats
Posts: 18,658
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
I don't think there is any advantage rearranging things for this tax year at least, and hopefully by then she'll be in work again, "airport cafe lady" is the latest tease as we had a silly notion of buying a franchise of some sort... the ground rents would be horrendous though and in a recession airport travel will reduce and people won't want expensive airport food. Maybe a recovery play a bit down the line. Lots of ideas anyway which is keeping her cheerful. Chip shops have nice profit margins, but high gas bills and rising fish prices, whether customers would downgrade from restaurants to chip shops or chip shops to Tesco value to eat at home I don't know. Plus she'd smell of fried fish. I like fish sometimes... Maybe she could take some steroids and train to be a bailiff
Last edited by john banks; 26 July 2008 at 01:41 PM.
#22
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: 32 cylinders and many cats
Posts: 18,658
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
We would never fraudulently claim. It isn't worth it, we would worry about it, and if found out you would potentially have a criminal record. That wouldn't do future job/business prospects any good either.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Pro-Line Motorsport
Car Parts For Sale
2
29 September 2015 07:36 PM