Apparently you should call a chav, "a chav"
#1
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Apparently you should call a chav, "a chav"
Because its offensive
Ban 'chav', says Fabians chief | UK news | The Guardian
I though that was the point
Ban 'chav', says Fabians chief | UK news | The Guardian
I though that was the point
#2
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Oo'p Norf
Posts: 873
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hang on my definition of a chav isn't white working class....
It's a fooking idle laybout, on benefits because he can't be arsed to get a job (not because he can't), causing grief to anyone and everyone whilst loitering somewhere with a bottle of white lightning 'cider'...
It's a fooking idle laybout, on benefits because he can't be arsed to get a job (not because he can't), causing grief to anyone and everyone whilst loitering somewhere with a bottle of white lightning 'cider'...
#3
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
Hang on my definition of a chav isn't white working class....
It's a fooking idle laybout, on benefits because he can't be arsed to get a job (not because he can't), causing grief to anyone and everyone whilst loitering somewhere with a bottle of white lightning 'cider'...
It's a fooking idle laybout, on benefits because he can't be arsed to get a job (not because he can't), causing grief to anyone and everyone whilst loitering somewhere with a bottle of white lightning 'cider'...
#4
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Sheffield; Rome of the North
Posts: 17,582
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ive always preferred calling the dirty scrubbers, just that: dirty scrubbers. Im not working class, but I too am certain that charvers are part of an underclass and nothing at all to do with working class people. Tom Hampson is another well-meaning but hopelessly out of touch liberal and the Fabian Society is a left-wing think tank; that says it all really.
#7
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Sheffield; Rome of the North
Posts: 17,582
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Brillaint! Ive been negged for saying that Im not working class. Thats one up for the proletariat. Its amusing that whoever has negged me wasnt sharp enough to understand why I mentioned it.
Trending Topics
#8
Moderator
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: The Terry Crews of moderation. P P P P P P POWER!!
Posts: 18,687
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hang on my definition of a chav isn't white working class....
It's a fooking idle laybout, on benefits because he can't be arsed to get a job (not because he can't), causing grief to anyone and everyone whilst loitering somewhere with a bottle of white lightning 'cider'...
It's a fooking idle laybout, on benefits because he can't be arsed to get a job (not because he can't), causing grief to anyone and everyone whilst loitering somewhere with a bottle of white lightning 'cider'...
#9
The stereotype description applied to members of the white working class is offensive to a group that cannot defend itself, according to Tom Hampson, editorial director of the Fabian Society.
Cannot defend themselves?!?
They're the ******* that keep stabbing the public.
Cannot defend themselves?!?
They're the ******* that keep stabbing the public.
#11
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Logged Out
Posts: 10,221
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hang on my definition of a chav isn't white working class....
It's a fooking idle laybout, on benefits because he can't be arsed to get a job (not because he can't), causing grief to anyone and everyone whilst loitering somewhere with a bottle of white lightning 'cider'...
It's a fooking idle laybout, on benefits because he can't be arsed to get a job (not because he can't), causing grief to anyone and everyone whilst loitering somewhere with a bottle of white lightning 'cider'...
That Michael Carrol springs to mind as a prime example.
The word gets misused now to describe anybody that is socially challenged.
#13
This never was the reason for the term 'chav' though. What you describe is and has always been plain scum as far as I know. A chav was a somebody with money that could buy style in terms of material goods but could never possess it personally.
That Michael Carrol springs to mind as a prime example.
The word gets misused now to describe anybody that is socially challenged.
That Michael Carrol springs to mind as a prime example.
The word gets misused now to describe anybody that is socially challenged.
Kevin
#16
Scooby Regular
Beat me too it.
It was on Breakfast news this am. They made a point that if chav is a term for a particular part of society, why are there not calls to ban snob, toff etc.
Love the benefit pic
It was on Breakfast news this am. They made a point that if chav is a term for a particular part of society, why are there not calls to ban snob, toff etc.
Love the benefit pic
#17
Scooby Senior
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wildberg, Germany/Reading, UK
Posts: 9,706
Likes: 0
Received 73 Likes
on
54 Posts
"deep and revealing level of class hatred", a think tank will say next week.
Kind of takes the whole point of a think tank away doesn't it? as it is obviously scripted in advance so why bother having these think tanks?? or am I missing some point here?
#18
Supporting Member
iTrader: (28)
The stereotype description applied to members of the white working class is offensive to a group that cannot defend itself, according to Tom Hampson, editorial director of the Fabian Society.
Cannot defend themselves?!?
They're the ******* that keep stabbing the public.
Cannot defend themselves?!?
They're the ******* that keep stabbing the public.
And what a surprise...
The article's from the Guardian - that well known newspaper that often publishes articles for the people that live in their gated communities away from the real world and away from those "nasty working class people."
If I was in power I think I'd start by having all think tanks "emptied" LOL. After all, they either come up with complete cr*p or tell us the ******* obvious anyway...
#23
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Disco, Disco!
Posts: 21,825
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hang on my definition of a chav isn't white working class....
It's a fooking idle laybout, on benefits because he can't be arsed to get a job (not because he can't), causing grief to anyone and everyone whilst loitering somewhere with a bottle of white lightning 'cider'...
It's a fooking idle laybout, on benefits because he can't be arsed to get a job (not because he can't), causing grief to anyone and everyone whilst loitering somewhere with a bottle of white lightning 'cider'...
Fabian Society showing just how out of touch they really are.
#26
Scooby Regular
I thought it came from Chatham originally?
Either way, the meaning has been lost as it never referred to just workshy *******s, it could be applied to those with cash as well, the Beckhams, Westbrook etc etc.
I don't think chav is offensive enough for the scum of this country.
Either way, the meaning has been lost as it never referred to just workshy *******s, it could be applied to those with cash as well, the Beckhams, Westbrook etc etc.
I don't think chav is offensive enough for the scum of this country.
#30
Supporting Member
iTrader: (28)
I thought it came from Chatham originally?
Either way, the meaning has been lost as it never referred to just workshy *******s, it could be applied to those with cash as well, the Beckhams, Westbrook etc etc.
I don't think chav is offensive enough for the scum of this country.
Either way, the meaning has been lost as it never referred to just workshy *******s, it could be applied to those with cash as well, the Beckhams, Westbrook etc etc.
I don't think chav is offensive enough for the scum of this country.
Instead of Chav, how about WAF's? Workshy, Arrogant F**kers