Gordon Brown, Hypocrite!
#1
Gordon Brown, Hypocrite!
Making speeches about the Mugabe election not being democratic.
When did we vote for you as prime minister*, you tw@?
Alcazar
*......Yes, I know, we don't vote for prime ministers, but we have always voted before for a party, knowing who it's leader is, and knowing that HE/SHE will be PM
When did we vote for you as prime minister*, you tw@?
Alcazar
*......Yes, I know, we don't vote for prime ministers, but we have always voted before for a party, knowing who it's leader is, and knowing that HE/SHE will be PM
#2
Scooby Regular
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Ascended to the next level
Posts: 7,498
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Any other prime minister would have done the honourable thing and called an election or given the public an indication of when an election was going to be held.
Granted, John Major was in office for over a year before calling an election, but I recall that he wasn't disliked anywhere near as much by the public; Proven by him winning when he did call an election. Also he did have a genuine excuse, that being the Gulf War; What's Gordon's excuse? A wibbly wobbly economy - of which he was actively involved in managing? Bearing in mind, Major had to contend with similar economic issues also.
Granted, John Major was in office for over a year before calling an election, but I recall that he wasn't disliked anywhere near as much by the public; Proven by him winning when he did call an election. Also he did have a genuine excuse, that being the Gulf War; What's Gordon's excuse? A wibbly wobbly economy - of which he was actively involved in managing? Bearing in mind, Major had to contend with similar economic issues also.
#3
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Disco, Disco!
Posts: 21,825
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Gutless Gordon - lives up to his nickname anyway.
He did not call one and said a year ago(i am paraphrasing) "Judge me on my results at the next general election"
So far, so good eh Gordon
He did not call one and said a year ago(i am paraphrasing) "Judge me on my results at the next general election"
So far, so good eh Gordon
#4
What plonkers he and his cronies really are! And how about the democracy involved in breaking their promise over the referendum over the Lisbon Constitution. (its not a treaty at all!) I wonder what they are in line for should the Eu get its way over federalisation.
Les
Les
#5
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: .
Posts: 20,035
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Granted, John Major was in office for over a year before calling an election, but I recall that he wasn't disliked anywhere near as much by the public; Proven by him winning when he did call an election. Also he did have a genuine excuse, that being the Gulf War; What's Gordon's excuse? A wibbly wobbly economy - of which he was actively involved in managing? Bearing in mind, Major had to contend with similar economic issues also.
Anyway to me it is sinple, if a ruling party wants to change the prime minister then there should be a general election, that should be law.
#6
Scooby Regular
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Ascended to the next level
Posts: 7,498
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So you voted for Kinnock or Paddy then
And Major had more votes than even Blair has ever manged throughout his terms, quite a feat IMO. Don't think El Gordo will manage that
And Major had more votes than even Blair has ever manged throughout his terms, quite a feat IMO. Don't think El Gordo will manage that
Last edited by Shark Man; 28 June 2008 at 12:12 PM.
#7
Brown now compared to Mugabe ... and Zimbabwe compared to the place we call home??
Seen it all now
Mugabe should be executed and the opposition put into power - it would be easier than Iraq!
Seen it all now
Mugabe should be executed and the opposition put into power - it would be easier than Iraq!
Trending Topics
#8
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Disco, Disco!
Posts: 21,825
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Problem lies in Africa with an ex Brit colony, we cannot go sort it as it just fuels the anti west/white argument and feeling.
About time the surrounding African countries got off the fence and got involved instead of just the odd word or two!
#9
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: South Bucks
Posts: 3,213
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You'd first have to invade a country with a shoreline. Then supply two/three armies in the field in hostile territory.
- One to take the first country and secure its borders.
- One to suppress the first country or "manage" it.
- One to push through and take Zimbabwe.
Anyone who thinks the populace will welcome change with open arms only has to look at Iraq. Whenever you have men in green suits holding guns, eventually civilian opinion hardens against them. People don't like being threatened and being told what to do.
J.
#10
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Disco, Disco!
Posts: 21,825
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
No it wouldn't. :P
You'd first have to invade a country with a shoreline. Then supply two/three armies in the field in hostile territory.
- One to take the first country and secure its borders.
- One to suppress the first country or "manage" it.
- One to push through and take Zimbabwe.
Anyone who thinks the populace will welcome change with open arms only has to look at Iraq. Whenever you have men in green suits holding guns, eventually civilian opinion hardens against them. People don't like being threatened and being told what to do.
J.
You'd first have to invade a country with a shoreline. Then supply two/three armies in the field in hostile territory.
- One to take the first country and secure its borders.
- One to suppress the first country or "manage" it.
- One to push through and take Zimbabwe.
Anyone who thinks the populace will welcome change with open arms only has to look at Iraq. Whenever you have men in green suits holding guns, eventually civilian opinion hardens against them. People don't like being threatened and being told what to do.
J.
That would agian mean an African state or two would need to get off of the fence...
Last edited by The Zohan; 28 June 2008 at 05:32 PM.
#11
Scooby Regular
We have had 12 Prime Ministers since WWII and only 6 of them were appointed through a general election victory. I do think though that there should be a constitutional ruling that if they enter office via any means other than a clear democratic election win, then they MUST hold a GE within 12 months of taking office.
#12
Vindaloo
No need for shoreline - air power and we would simply take the air space we needed - anything coming within 50 miles of one of our planes would be shot down without warning ...... make that clear to the neighbouring states and they will come aboard.
These are only African states and not a patch on what Iraq was ....... in, execute Mugabe, arrest his cronies, hold peaceful elections and get out - 12 months.
No need for shoreline - air power and we would simply take the air space we needed - anything coming within 50 miles of one of our planes would be shot down without warning ...... make that clear to the neighbouring states and they will come aboard.
These are only African states and not a patch on what Iraq was ....... in, execute Mugabe, arrest his cronies, hold peaceful elections and get out - 12 months.
#16
We have had 12 Prime Ministers since WWII and only 6 of them were appointed through a general election victory. I do think though that there should be a constitutional ruling that if they enter office via any means other than a clear democratic election win, then they MUST hold a GE within 12 months of taking office.
Les
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Pro-Line Motorsport
Car Parts For Sale
2
29 September 2015 07:36 PM