Notices
Non Scooby Related Anything Non-Scooby related

Government lies and the Northern Rock crisis

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 28 September 2007, 11:10 AM
  #1  
GOLDMAN 555
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
GOLDMAN 555's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Home of Sky cop shows SLOUGH
Posts: 331
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Government lies and the Northern Rock crisis

I really have lost faith in the government.
Remember when the Northern Rock crisis was at its height the government and Northern Rock were both saying that all of your savings are covered up until £32,000 by some sort of underwritten scheme.
Well it turns out there is a slush fund to cover such an eventuality however it only has £250 million in it. And most of that would be sucked up by the initial £2000 which is one hundred percent guaranteed.
In short if Northern Rock would have gone pop most of the people would have lost all their money.
Maybe those people queueing to get their money out were not so stupid after all.
It has also come out that the collapse was very close to happening this is why the government stepped in and unconditionally guaranteed the money.
The government would have really looked stupid after saying the money was guaranteed and then 95% of the people with money in Northern Rock lost everything..............
Old 28 September 2007, 11:19 AM
  #2  
David Lock
Scooby Regular
 
David Lock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Weston Super Mare, Somerset.
Posts: 14,102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Not even this government would have reneged on their promise to guarantee that savers funds would be protected. dl
Old 28 September 2007, 11:19 AM
  #3  
dpb
Scooby Regular
 
dpb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: riding the crest of a wave ...
Posts: 46,493
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

i would dearly love to know if this was indeed just political manoevering (sp)- well never know of course
Old 28 September 2007, 11:26 AM
  #4  
Trout
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Trout's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 15,271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

When HM made the underwriting commitment they had to put aside £10-14 billion. I think you have been misinformed.
Old 28 September 2007, 11:29 AM
  #5  
lozgti
Scooby Regular
 
lozgti's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,490
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I reckon there is more to come....
Old 28 September 2007, 11:45 AM
  #6  
GOLDMAN 555
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
GOLDMAN 555's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Home of Sky cop shows SLOUGH
Posts: 331
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Rannoch
When HM made the underwriting commitment they had to put aside £10-14 billion. I think you have been misinformed.

I’m talking about the FSA’s bank account guarantee.

They guarantee to the first £2000 however there is a caveat on the following money up until £35,000. The caveat states that second tranche of money comes out of the FSA’s fund…………….. There is only £250 million in this fund.

The billions you are talking about from the Treasury. This was only offered after it looked like Northern Rock was going to collapse.

The government came out before the Treasury stepped in and stated that up to £35,000 was covered it wasn’t this is why the Treasury stepped in.

This whole situation was nearly extremely ugly for the government….
Old 28 September 2007, 12:14 PM
  #7  
Leslie
Scooby Regular
 
Leslie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 39,877
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by David Lock
Not even this government would have reneged on their promise to guarantee that savers funds would be protected. dl
Do you really believe that? They reneged on the pensioners who have lost so much because of their guarantees which turned out to be rubbish!

They have lied to us for the last ten years anyway!

Les
Old 28 September 2007, 12:17 PM
  #8  
bugeyeandy
Scooby Regular
 
bugeyeandy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: West London
Posts: 1,914
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I think you missed the sarcasm in his post...
Old 28 September 2007, 01:16 PM
  #9  
Miniman
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Miniman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 995
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GOLDMAN 555
I’m talking about the FSA’s bank account guarantee. They guarantee to the first £2000 however there is a caveat on the following money up until £35,000. The caveat states that second tranche of money comes out of the FSA’s fund…………….. There is only £250 million in this fund.[
I think you're mixing two different guarantees and then blaming the government. Prior to the government stepping in, I saw numerous news programs and papers that stated the details of the FSA guarantees and that you may lose a % depending on your savings. I don't remember anyone from the government or NR saying this was wrong and your full savings were guaranteed? Put simply, I don't believe that any government would lie to this extent (I do agree that they get things wrong - but that's not the same as outright lying).

If you had savings in NR I would have thought you would have paid more attention than me to the details, espcially if it was all over the 6 o'clock news.

Last edited by Miniman; 28 September 2007 at 06:12 PM.
Old 28 September 2007, 04:41 PM
  #10  
Luminous
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
Luminous's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Muppetising life
Posts: 15,449
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I remember it being clearly and endlessly stated that the first 2k were 100%, and the rest up to 35k were 90% secure. I never heard a mention that the total fund to pay this was only 250m.

The gov said there was no need to panic, clearly there was.
Old 28 September 2007, 04:41 PM
  #11  
Trout
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Trout's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 15,271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I am with Miniman hence my earlier comments.

Mixing apples and pears and then accusing the Government of lying.

The problem with Northern Rock was not losing the savers money. It's business model was reliant on the securitisation of mortgage business in the capital markets rather than against savers cash (like the old Building Society model).

NR made commitments on new mortgages and because of the credit crunch was having difficulty in securitising the new lending for two reasons - the interbank lending rate went very high (LIBOR) and so the new business could only be written at a significant loss, and more importantly banks stopped putting new capital into the debt marketplace.

All of this has very little to do with savers deposits.
Old 29 September 2007, 01:40 PM
  #12  
Leslie
Scooby Regular
 
Leslie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 39,877
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bugeyeandy
I think you missed the sarcasm in his post...
I didn't actually, but it was a good excuse for a rant!

Les
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
JimBowen
ICE
5
02 July 2023 01:54 PM
Wrx sti Ed
ScoobyNet General
8
02 November 2015 08:50 PM
dpb
Non Scooby Related
14
03 October 2015 10:37 AM
fumbduck
ScoobyNet General
18
29 September 2015 09:16 PM
lozgti1
Non Scooby Related
33
20 September 2015 01:03 AM



Quick Reply: Government lies and the Northern Rock crisis



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:23 PM.