Notices
Non Scooby Related Anything Non-Scooby related

One for Snug/fast bloke/other FA types

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 14 September 2007, 01:09 PM
  #1  
Deep Singh
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
Deep Singh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 5,582
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default One for Snug/fast bloke/other FA types

Does the ns and i three year index linked certificate still represent good value for higher rate taxpayers?
Three years seems like a long time what with irs on the increase.
At current inflation rates what is the actual return in % terms for a hrtp?

Thanks
Old 14 September 2007, 01:19 PM
  #2  
RESSE
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
RESSE's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Shropshire
Posts: 3,234
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
Question

National Statistics Online

RPI running @ 3.8% for July, was slightly higher in June (4.2% if I remember).

3 Year Index Linked Gilts - are these offered with extra interest of 1.35% compound over 3 years?

I think that works out at 2.25% gross for HRTP?

You can reinvest matured certificates with no £ limit (otherwise £15,000 per issue).
Old 14 September 2007, 01:34 PM
  #3  
The Snug Rhino
Scooby Regular
 
The Snug Rhino's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: I have ad blocked my rep - so dont waste your time!
Posts: 1,548
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i'll leave for others, i do almost no work with savings.
Old 14 September 2007, 02:08 PM
  #4  
Deep Singh
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
Deep Singh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 5,582
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Etheridge-Bird
National Statistics Online

RPI running @ 3.8% for July, was slightly higher in June (4.2% if I remember).

3 Year Index Linked Gilts - are these offered with extra interest of 1.35% compound over 3 years?

I think that works out at 2.25% gross for HRTP?

You can reinvest matured certificates with no £ limit (otherwise £15,000 per issue).

On the website it says the tax free rate is index + 1.35% and the equivalent gross return for hrtp is index + 2.25%. So if the index is approx 4 then the return is 4+2.25 = 6.25% gross equivalent. If thats right then whats the point as AllLeic do an instant access account giving 6.3% and StdLife a 6 month bond giving 7%
Old 14 September 2007, 02:23 PM
  #5  
fast bloke
Scooby Regular
 
fast bloke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 26,619
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

RPI was 3.8 in July, giving 6.05, but if RPI jumped back to 4.5 (which it was in May IIRC) you would get 6.75. These certs don't always offer the best return, but they do offer good protection from inflation
Old 14 September 2007, 02:35 PM
  #6  
Deep Singh
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
Deep Singh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 5,582
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by fast bloke
RPI was 3.8 in July, giving 6.05, but if RPI jumped back to 4.5 (which it was in May IIRC) you would get 6.75. These certs don't always offer the best return, but they do offer good protection from inflation
Thanks. 3 years seems too long for me for approx 6.75% when I can get 6.3% with instant access.

I thought it may have been 6ish% tax free which would have course made it very attractive
Old 14 September 2007, 02:53 PM
  #7  
john banks
Scooby Regular
 
john banks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: 32 cylinders and many cats
Posts: 18,658
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Well it was about 6% when RPI was higher, and it is tax free. Now it is more like 5%, but still worth it esp. for a higher rate tax payer with ISAs all used up etc. For a couple you can put in £60k in the present issues for both 3 & 5 year. The fixed rate stuff doesn't look good value at present to me.
Old 14 September 2007, 03:49 PM
  #8  
Deep Singh
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
Deep Singh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 5,582
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by john banks
Well it was about 6% when RPI was higher, and it is tax free. Now it is more like 5%, but still worth it esp. for a higher rate tax payer with ISAs all used up etc. For a couple you can put in £60k in the present issues for both 3 & 5 year. The fixed rate stuff doesn't look good value at present to me.
John I'm being thick here but:

Return is 3.8% + 1.35% = 5.15% tax free

The gross equivalent (I presume this is what I use to compare it to non tax free returns?) is 3.8% + 2.25 =6.05%. Why is this a good idea if I can get 6.3% instant access and 7% for a 6 month bond?

Thanks
Old 14 September 2007, 04:53 PM
  #9  
john banks
Scooby Regular
 
john banks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: 32 cylinders and many cats
Posts: 18,658
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Gross equiv 8.58%

I cannot find a better guaranteed return.
Old 14 September 2007, 05:42 PM
  #10  
Petem95
Scooby Regular
 
Petem95's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Scoobynet
Posts: 5,387
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Deep Singh
Does the ns and i three year index linked certificate still represent good value for higher rate taxpayers?
Three years seems like a long time what with irs on the increase.
At current inflation rates what is the actual return in % terms for a hrtp?

Thanks
Read the small print Deep - you can withdraw either the 3 or 5 year term ones after a minimum of 12months and there's no penalty and you receive all the interest

The way inflation (thanks mainly to food prices, oil prices etc) is going these look like they'll be worth hanging on to for a good while yet!
Old 14 September 2007, 06:39 PM
  #11  
Deep Singh
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
Deep Singh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 5,582
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by john banks
Gross equiv 8.58%

I cannot find a better guaranteed return.

Sorry but someone will have to help me with the maths

National Savings & Investments - Interest rates

The gross equivalent is stated as index (say 4%) + 2.25% for hrtp. How does that come to 8.58% gross equiv

I had read this circa 9% gross equiv before here, but to me the maths don't add up
Old 15 September 2007, 11:19 AM
  #12  
john banks
Scooby Regular
 
john banks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: 32 cylinders and many cats
Posts: 18,658
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

The missing link is that the index of (say) 4% on the NS&I product is tax free.

If you are comparing a taxable product you need to return 4/0.6=6.67% gross just to stay with the index after tax.

Your "real" rate of return on NS&I is only 1.35%, but if you have your money in even the better savings accounts at higher rate tax you'll struggle even to keep with inflation.

One of the kicks in the teeth over recent years is that many savers are really losing money after tax and inflation. The spread between RPI and base rates has been within 1% only recently, which has been dismal for savers.

Last edited by john banks; 15 September 2007 at 11:25 AM.
Old 15 September 2007, 04:09 PM
  #13  
fast bloke
Scooby Regular
 
fast bloke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 26,619
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

John, The gross equivalent is the rate you would have to achieve on a taxable product so you would need 6.67% before tax. The net equivalent would be 4% + 1.35% as that is what the product actually pays with no tax to pay/be subtracted
Old 15 September 2007, 08:13 PM
  #14  
john banks
Scooby Regular
 
john banks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: 32 cylinders and many cats
Posts: 18,658
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

fast bloke, I don't agree with your calculation or at least my reading of what you've written.

6.67% before tax only covers the 4% (in this example) inflation.

Continuing to use 4% inflation and the 1.35% return, I need 8.92% gross from a taxable product to match my return.

Using the earlier exapmle of 3.8% inflation, I need 8.58% gross from a taxable product.

What is wrong with my working please?
Old 15 September 2007, 08:24 PM
  #15  
john banks
Scooby Regular
 
john banks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: 32 cylinders and many cats
Posts: 18,658
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Worked example:

1. £15000 in 6.67% savings account
Interest before tax: £1005
After tax: £603

2. £15000 in 4%+1.35% NS&I
Interest: £802.50

If I'm wrong on this I've catastrophically misinvested £60k and take back all I've thought about IFAs and will book in to see one
Old 16 September 2007, 12:49 AM
  #16  
fast bloke
Scooby Regular
 
fast bloke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 26,619
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by john banks
If you are comparing a taxable product you need to return 4/0.6=6.67% gross just to stay with the index after tax.
John - I think you might be allowing for tax twice in your calculations on the 15k, but when I sober up I will work your example to see if I am wrong. No chance before Monday thought. It is gonna be a painful weekend
Old 16 September 2007, 08:29 AM
  #17  
john banks
Scooby Regular
 
john banks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: 32 cylinders and many cats
Posts: 18,658
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I have included higher rate tax just once at 40% (hence the 0.6 divisor).

6.69% would be the gross equiv of 4%+1.35% for a basic rate tax payer, but we're talking higher rate throughout this thread.

When RPI is 4.8% the gross equiv of 4.8%+1.35% is 10.25% for higher rate!

The way NS&I express it can lead to the error that you can simply add RPI to the 2.25% as Deep did. However, you have to also gross up the tax free return of RPI as well to make a comparison with a taxable product. There are articles floating around the financial columns that agree with my calculations, some by financial advisors, some by newspaper hacks.

You need 6.33% gross for a higher rate tax payer just to match 3.8% RPI, which is why now that RPI has dropped the real return on the market leading instant access accounts is zero for a higher rate tax payer.

It seems unfair that you're taxed on inflationary returns in a normal taxable savings product.

Last edited by john banks; 16 September 2007 at 08:40 AM.
Old 16 September 2007, 06:57 PM
  #18  
Deep Singh
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
Deep Singh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 5,582
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'll be interested to see the outcome of this, though I suspect JB is right. I can't really see a Scot getting his maths wrong on money matters

JB, as you've read the small print is what Pete says correct? ie can you withdraw after 1 year with no penalties and take that years return?
Old 16 September 2007, 07:23 PM
  #19  
john banks
Scooby Regular
 
john banks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: 32 cylinders and many cats
Posts: 18,658
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I'm English

Yes you can withdraw after a year without penalty as such except that the interest rate is a little lower in the earlier years though.

I expect our 5 year ones may well get cashed in early to buy our next house, but perhaps not the 3 year ones.

I'm getting a little worried about our A&L account being over the compensation scheme limit with some of the rumours about them and B&B getting contaminated by some of the same problems as NR, but unless I hear any concrete news I'll leave it until 1st October before withdrawing down to the compensation scheme limit to avoid losing interest.

Last edited by john banks; 16 September 2007 at 07:26 PM.
Old 16 September 2007, 07:49 PM
  #20  
Deep Singh
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
Deep Singh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 5,582
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by john banks
I'm English

Yes you can withdraw after a year without penalty as such except that the interest rate is a little lower in the earlier years though.

I expect our 5 year ones may well get cashed in early to buy our next house, but perhaps not the 3 year ones.

I'm getting a little worried about our A&L account being over the compensation scheme limit with some of the rumours about them and B&B getting contaminated by some of the same problems as NR, but unless I hear any concrete news I'll leave it until 1st October before withdrawing down to the compensation scheme limit to avoid losing interest.

I may well be accused of being hysterical but I would not have any money in any bank beyond the compensation limit

ps sorry, thought you were Scottish
Old 16 September 2007, 07:56 PM
  #21  
The Snug Rhino
Scooby Regular
 
The Snug Rhino's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: I have ad blocked my rep - so dont waste your time!
Posts: 1,548
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Deep Singh
I may well be accused of being hysterical but I would not have any money in any bank beyond the compensation limit

ps sorry, thought you were Scottish
Your hysterical

If you hold a lot of cash (as some people do) the idea of limiting yourslef to 35k means you end up with loads of accounts to avoid something that wont happen....a UK bank going under with your cash.
Old 16 September 2007, 08:21 PM
  #22  
john banks
Scooby Regular
 
john banks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: 32 cylinders and many cats
Posts: 18,658
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

If the FSA was as confident as you then why do they only pay out £31700?

There should be a risk premium (ie a higher interest rate) attached to accounts with balances over £35000 to reflect the risk IMHO.

I'm trying to work out right now what interest rate Northern Rock would have to give me to deposit £100000 with them... 10% would make me look at it, but little less.

How much more would I want from Alliance and Leicester to stop me withdrawing down to the compensation scheme limit? I don't know, maybe 7% at the moment?
Old 16 September 2007, 10:58 PM
  #23  
Deep Singh
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
Deep Singh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 5,582
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by john banks
If the FSA was as confident as you then why do they only pay out £31700?
Its not even that good. The first £2k is paid at 100% and the next £33000 you ony get 90%. So when they say £31700 is insured its misleading, if you had £31700 in the account you would only get £28730.

The figure £31700 comes from what you would get back if you had £35k in the account.

So the FSA actually only FULLY gaurantees £2k!!!


Old 18 September 2007, 10:00 AM
  #24  
john banks
Scooby Regular
 
john banks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: 32 cylinders and many cats
Posts: 18,658
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

RPI now 4.1, but CPI only 1.8. So at 5.45% return tax free we are getting a gain on a basket of goods per year of 3.65% in real terms. If only I believed CPI was related to my real life spending Maybe it is time to buy more gadgets
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
KAS35RSTI
Subaru
27
04 November 2021 07:12 PM
makkink
General Technical
10
01 October 2015 05:41 PM
Tidgy
Member's Gallery
13
01 October 2015 08:25 AM
yabbadoo4
ScoobyNet General
11
30 September 2015 10:33 PM
Phil3822
General Technical
0
30 September 2015 06:29 PM



Quick Reply: One for Snug/fast bloke/other FA types



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:25 AM.