The Zohan

Never fear prison or the threat of it

Turn to religion - in partiicular Jehovah's Witnesses should see you right.

Even if you molest an 18 month old you will be fine!

Jehovah’s Witness sex offender is spared jail - Times Online

There is no justice here!

I hope someone uses one of the 1000's of illegal guns in circulation on this POS and the POS Judge as well - Oh that's right if you did you would go to jail.

So you can go to jail for no payment of taxes, fines etc but not for abusing a child - what has this country come to...

Sonic'

I heard about this over a week ago

It is disgusting & sickening that he has escaped prison, but then he would probably have an easier time in prison the way things are these days

unclebuck

what???

Policing in this country has become a sad joke....

Here's another example:

Don't call them 'hoodie scum', police tell victim who complained about yobs | the Daily Mail

fatherpierre

Ah, the good old Daily Mail.

The last bastion of middle England......

unclebuck

Don't shoot the messenger. If you don't like what they draw attention to, stick to the Guardian or the Independent where everything is 'perfect' in New Labour Britain.

The Zohan

You forget that if it is not in the Gucci socialist, sorry New Labour PC liberal papers then it just cannot be true.

Bit of balance from the Guardian on law and order

Election battle lines are set over crime and punishment | Columnists | Guardian Unlimited

fatherpierre

I stick with Metro or London Lite as they are the only papers that give VFM.

Infractme!

burn the pedofillieis!!!!!

Simon 69

Are pedofiles American paedophiles.....?

Simon

DocJock

I've read the original link a couple of times.

Where does it say his sentence had anything to do with his religion?
It does say that the judge handed down a light sentence after he was told the guy had undergone rehabilitation. (haven't they all?)

Personally I think he should have been jailed for a long time, but the OP seems to be suggesting he got off lightly because he's a JW and I can't see the link.

The Zohan

Listening to R5 live the other day it seems he used his position within the JW organisation to get access to the families and the kids which is not uncommon for child molesters to infiltrate schools, clubs religious organisations to gain access to kids from a position of respect and trust.


Even after the conviction
He remains an elder within the JW organisation even after the case, his rehabilitation was in conjuction with the JW organisation.

Whilst in some ways i rerpect the JW standing by him i do not see how how or why he could have escaped jail without the support he has had from them.

That is my point

swampster

iTrader: (1)

Nah a pedofile is someone who just likes walking all over the place for no particular reason

Infractme!

It makes me laugh when you see obvious educational subnormals like Hapless banging on about 'pedofiles'.

Exactly like these people

BBC News | WALES | Paediatrician attacks 'ignorant' vandals

Quite honestly I wonder how this sort get it together to continue breathing. Obviously it would be better for the rest of us if they didn't.

The Zohan

LOL!

Ifractme gracing one of my threads with his incisive wit and charm - must be my lucky day.

The POS i mentioned has been convicted of sexual assault against children, one as young as 18 month old. Convicted - for the hard of thinking (maybe you) that means he is guilty.

Your almost childish vileness clouding your ability to think again is it, just how do you draw the comparison?!?
I highlight a convicted serial child molester who walks free from court with no more that 3 years supervision and you bring up a case of badly mistaken identity.

It could be that you are not as smart as you think you are.

Perhaps you are pointing out the error of my ways by the mispelling 'pedofile', well read on.

Thanks for the pm's BTW, enjoyed the spelling mistake contained within said pm- oh dear, so clever (well, maybe in infractme world) and yet so flawed or is it too arrogant to realise that you are not a smart as you think. Would take a real man to realise this and deal with so will not be holding my breath, that and really I just do not care.

I'll post a section of the pm with the mistake, see if you can spot it

Quote

"Heh Moron

At least learn to spell Paedophile before starting a thread on it or you sound like the sort of knee-jerk ******** who decided to attack a paediatrician because they think she was a pervert with a prediliction for children."
(clue - it's near the end)

Who's the moron then?

I make the point only because you seem so keen to point out other peoples mistakes yet you are hoisted buy your own petard yet agian LOL!

People in glass houses, etc.
Could have been written for you really

Paul

Simon 69

I claim the moral right to be recognised as the author of the following: hard of thinking.

Terminator X

iTrader: (7)

Judges have clearly lost it. There must be some forum for complaining about such leniant (sp?) sentances? Anyone know what can be done?

TX.

[edit - Paul, aren't you one of the Mods? Why not just ban some of the kn*bs that post on here?]

Infractme!

He can't, he was kicked off the moderating team after orchestrating a campaign of phone abuse against some ebayer on the board. It had nasty racist overtones as well. Good riddance to bad rubbish in my opinion.

Regarding the Hapless one's comments above my typo wasn't an obvious misspelling in my thread title..................also you edited your post above and still couldn't get it right.

Funkii Munkii

Let just bin the Human Rights Act, torch the f*cking PC brigade and get on with some good old fashioned zero tolerance in this country.

Proper sentencing would be a start in a proper scabby old cell, Life should mean life not 3 years in a 4* hotel with widescreen and DVD, and that goes for juveniles as well these ***** end up with more holidays than Judith Chalmers FFS, and we're the mugs funding all of this !!

In all of the countries I have been to in Asia and Africa that still use British Law (there are plenty and they are very proud of the fact they still use it) from the colonial days must look at the UK and laugh when they see how diluted it has become.

Sunday rant over

The Zohan

"my typo wasn't an obvious misspelling in my thread title" - HUH?


LOL,
Let me spell it out for you as you cannot grasp this simple error.


'prediliction' - really, actually spelled predeliction.

I am not going to waste any more time on you in****te as you are simply not worth it, you seem to think i am so please continue. I for one just do not care for you or your sad snipings and your trolling. the old adages still hold true, do not feed the trolls.

I will admit to a certain small amount of satisfaction from picking up on your ****-poor spelling. Maybe you should keep clear of any long words in future or check with an adult if not sure

Now toddle of back to you sad ickle world where you believe you are king, oh and get a dictionary (that's a big book with lots of correctly spelt words in).

Oh, and picking up on my grammar and spelling - great stuff - WGAF except you. However, if you decide to do it in future you ought to make sure you get your own dribblings and rantings right first.

What an assclown

Bubba po

Predilection, actually. These petards go off at the slightest opportunity, don't they?

The Zohan

Now lmfao <shakes head>
Ooops, changed the wrong 'i', the point still stands mind

Infractme!

This from a sap who starts thread about 'pedofiles', the irony is palpable.

f1_fan

iTrader: (9)

LOL, a serious thread descends into a spelling competition

Brendan Hughes

Not for the first time.

Brendan Hughes

Slightly more on topic - I was at a conference recently where a judge gave a brief talk. He said he was a bit pissed off at people claiming that judges were crap based on newspaper reports of conviction rates, and said most defendants in his court were acquitted due to the atrocious quality of the prosecutors (not) preparing their cases properly.

Anyway, back to the ranting.

Leslie

I don't take the Daily Mail so I am not qualified to criticise it. I wionder if you could describe to me exactly why some people are always running it down and what exactly is wrong with that report in the link published in this thread.

I gather it supports Conservatism. Is that what is wrong with it. Do you admire our experiences with Labour so far?

PS. What is wrong with middle England?

Les