Spiderman 3
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 465
Likes: 0
Spiderman 3
Anyone been to see it yet?
Saw it last night, pretty good fun movie with some comedy moments. Our local cinema had it in digital (dont normally), the image quality was feckin incredible!
Kirsten Dunst ain't 'arf bad either
Saw it last night, pretty good fun movie with some comedy moments. Our local cinema had it in digital (dont normally), the image quality was feckin incredible!
Kirsten Dunst ain't 'arf bad either
Scooby Regular
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 6,652
Likes: 0
From: Runway two seven right.
Trending Topics
Scooby Regular
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,219
Likes: 0
From: Bedfordshire
BBC NEWS | Entertainment | Spider-Man hits to go 'on and on'
Scooby Regular
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,411
Likes: 0
From: www.aroundthesouth.co.uk
The download screen shots
vlcsnap-59296.png on Slide - Photo Sharing
vlcsnap-60733.png on Slide - Photo Sharing
vlcsnap-59296.png on Slide - Photo Sharing
vlcsnap-60733.png on Slide - Photo Sharing
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (6)
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 6,850
Likes: 0
From: Northampton, Xbox GamerTag - Neanderthal1976
I haven't seen it yet but from what I've heard theres too many story lines (almost like they cramed too many baddies in it).
Sony obviously want to have more films (cash cow!) but I doubt it would work without the same people playing the characters (Toby has said he'll only do no. 4 if the same director is used and Sam Raimi didn't like the fact he was forced into having Venom in no.3 so will prolly not want to do no.4).
Sony obviously want to have more films (cash cow!) but I doubt it would work without the same people playing the characters (Toby has said he'll only do no. 4 if the same director is used and Sam Raimi didn't like the fact he was forced into having Venom in no.3 so will prolly not want to do no.4).
Shame Venom was in 3, he got so little screen time with everything else going on. He should have been in SM4 as the sole baddy. Having Sandman & new Goblin would have been enough.
Still lots of good baddies for 4, 5 & 6 I guess.
Thought 3 was great, very similar to 1 & 2, but thats not a bad thing.
R.
Still lots of good baddies for 4, 5 & 6 I guess.
Thought 3 was great, very similar to 1 & 2, but thats not a bad thing.
R.
Scooby Regular
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,576
Likes: 0
From: Worthing..
SPiderman 2 is the pinnacle of superhero movies for me, and 3 doesnt come close.
First problem is scripting and storyline. THe last 45-30 minutes feel rushed and a bit of a "How are we going to get out of this" moment for the writers. A few continuity errors and frankly glaring errors creep in.
The Characters have nowhere near enough developement. Sandman inparticular had the begginings of a really good storyline, but he fleets in an out. Venom similarly would have made a godo "main" baddie, but again the fact he appears for 30 minutes at the end of a 2h30 film means he is nowehere near developed enough as a character.
Harry Osbournes story line is ok, but uses one of the oldest cliches in history.
On the plus side, some of the CGI work is gobsmacking, the "birth" of Sandman is just stunning. Also some of the set pieces are fantastic, sheer "spidey" action.
Overall I was underwhelmed. It's good, but not *that* good.
First problem is scripting and storyline. THe last 45-30 minutes feel rushed and a bit of a "How are we going to get out of this" moment for the writers. A few continuity errors and frankly glaring errors creep in.
The Characters have nowhere near enough developement. Sandman inparticular had the begginings of a really good storyline, but he fleets in an out. Venom similarly would have made a godo "main" baddie, but again the fact he appears for 30 minutes at the end of a 2h30 film means he is nowehere near developed enough as a character.
Harry Osbournes story line is ok, but uses one of the oldest cliches in history.
On the plus side, some of the CGI work is gobsmacking, the "birth" of Sandman is just stunning. Also some of the set pieces are fantastic, sheer "spidey" action.
Overall I was underwhelmed. It's good, but not *that* good.
The kids would enjoy it much more on the big screen, I know mine did - The only D/L's at the minute are crappy, dark cam jobs anyway.
Scooby Regular
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,617
Likes: 0
From: Dum dum de dum....
Me and the mrs went to see this last Friday night 
Got to agree with alot of what Pete B has said... the "birth" of Sandman was awesome
I don't usually agree with the film critic in the Evening standard who gave it 3/5 stars but I think he was alot closer than the Daily Stars 10/10 - I'd give it more a 8/10
If you liked the first 2 then I think most will like the 3rd....as for 3 more in the pipeline...... as someone mentioned above I think they'd only work if you have the same cast and so on
Got to agree with alot of what Pete B has said... the "birth" of Sandman was awesome
I don't usually agree with the film critic in the Evening standard who gave it 3/5 stars but I think he was alot closer than the Daily Stars 10/10 - I'd give it more a 8/10
If you liked the first 2 then I think most will like the 3rd....as for 3 more in the pipeline...... as someone mentioned above I think they'd only work if you have the same cast and so on
Scooby Regular
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 809
Likes: 0
I don't understand why anyone would watch cam job version of a CGI based film like this?
Personally, I'd never watch a cam job of any movie, as if it's something I want to watch, I'd rather wait until it was on TV than watch a sh1tty version, but that's just me.
Personally, I'd never watch a cam job of any movie, as if it's something I want to watch, I'd rather wait until it was on TV than watch a sh1tty version, but that's just me.
Twatful
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 9,050
Likes: 0
From: Grew up and don't drive Scoobs anymore!
Scooby Senior
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 16,293
Likes: 0
From: Next door to the WiFi connection
Worth a look although the colours aint as bright as I would have hoped.
Scooby Regular
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 960
Likes: 0
Went to see it on Saturday and thought it was rubbish - the storyline where the black blob stuff flies in on a meteor and just happens to attach itself to him was utter crap.
The only redeeming feature was Ms Dunst.
Also, the acting displayed by Spiderman's newspaper boss was woeful.
The only redeeming feature was Ms Dunst.
Also, the acting displayed by Spiderman's newspaper boss was woeful.
Went to see it on Saturday and thought it was rubbish - the storyline where the black blob stuff flies in on a meteor and just happens to attach itself to him was utter crap.
The only redeeming feature was Ms Dunst.
Also, the acting displayed by Spiderman's newspaper boss was woeful.
The only redeeming feature was Ms Dunst.
Also, the acting displayed by Spiderman's newspaper boss was woeful.
In the comics there is a whole background story to Venom, the goo, and how it gets to earth etc, I really thought it dropping to earth right next to Peter Parker was really lame.
R.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post