Notices
Non Scooby Related Anything Non-Scooby related

More jaw dropping examples of a Britain going crazy

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 1, 2006 | 07:13 PM
  #1  
Fuzz's Avatar
Fuzz
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 9,173
Likes: 0
From: Under your bonnet
Default More jaw dropping examples of a Britain going crazy

I was actually surfing the daily mail website looking for the "front page heroes" when I happened upon this.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/liv...n_page_id=1770


WTF is going on with this country

Andy
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2006 | 07:36 PM
  #2  
Clarebabes's Avatar
Clarebabes
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 21,366
Likes: 0
From: A big town with sh1t shops: Northampton
Default

Cor blimey. How did any of us not get locked up when we went to school? I'm surprised we haven't all grown up emotionally disturbed or with a prison sentence under our belts!
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2006 | 07:38 PM
  #3  
brumdaisy's Avatar
brumdaisy
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,082
Likes: 0
Default

Ok so maybe its not the best use of a courts time but it quite blatently did have a sexual element (the underwire is under the *****) so the only reason it ended up in court was that the pupil refused to accept the truth.... If someone in the street went to grab the front area of my bra I'd be bloody demanding sexual assault charges - male or female

'bra pinging' refers to the act of pinging the back of a bra strap not groping the front as in this case.... dirty slapper
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2006 | 09:57 PM
  #4  
Suresh's Avatar
Suresh
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 4,625
Likes: 4
Default

Indeed if the filthy chav had left the victim alone none of this would have happened. She won't be bullying anyone again soon I expect.
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2006 | 11:01 PM
  #5  
mart360's Avatar
mart360
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 12,329
Likes: 0
Default

brumsidaisy, read the article in full!!!

it was only becasue the girl who carried out the pinging, disagreed with the sexual wording in the charge, and because she challanged that, she was processed and run before the beak.

For once the beak had the forsight to chuck it out, rather than the pc brigade who want every offence relating to sex/ race/ hate/ crime brought to court.

Ok it wasnt her finest hour, but where is the common sense that should be applied???

lets look who failed.


Her teachers, they could have nipped it in the bud, and stopped it getting out of hand.

the bib, where is common sense, (oops forgot its all by the book now)

the cps, well nuff said, its all about pc and statistics.

and what aboput the other girls parents, no doubt hoping for a large slice of bunce, if it went to court!!


Mart
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2006 | 11:17 PM
  #6  
Chip's Avatar
Chip
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Feb 1999
Posts: 11,758
Likes: 0
From: Cardiff. Wales
Default

Originally Posted by mart360
brumsidaisy, read the article in full!!!

it was only becasue the girl who carried out the pinging, disagreed with the sexual wording in the charge, and because she challanged that, she was processed and run before the beak.

For once the beak had the forsight to chuck it out, rather than the pc brigade who want every offence relating to sex/ race/ hate/ crime brought to court.

Ok it wasnt her finest hour, but where is the common sense that should be applied???

lets look who failed.


Her teachers, they could have nipped it in the bud, and stopped it getting out of hand.

the bib, where is common sense, (oops forgot its all by the book now)

the cps, well nuff said, its all about pc and statistics.

and what aboput the other girls parents, no doubt hoping for a large slice of bunce, if it went to court!!


Mart
Nice to see some commonn sense at last.

Chip
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2006 | 11:59 PM
  #7  
brumdaisy's Avatar
brumdaisy
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,082
Likes: 0
Default

Mart

I did the read the article in its entirety. It was made clear to her that she would face court if she did not accept the warning.

In fairness the police did try to bring it to a sensible conclusion by issuing her with a warning. To the best of my knowledge they had no choice but refer to the sexual nature of the assault in the warning - because the assault WAS of a sexual nature! She refused to accept the warning so there was no choice but to then pursue the matter further.


I cant decide whether this is yet another gross over-reaction or not. It is a sexual assault and teachers do not have the authority to deal with criminal matters... On the other hand if two boys get into a fisty-cuffs bit of action in the playground, do the teachers drag the police in... I dont think so!

I think the head teacher did over react, the police then simply did their job but then the CPS could have thrown it out.

Or is it in response to the violence that is now escalating out of control in schools now? Ok so it wasn’t a stabbing but it seems boundaries are being crossed now that would not have been 'in my day' and I’m only in my 30's. The notion that a girl (or even a boy) would grab at a girls bra cup like that was just unheard of.....

And what if it had been a boy and it was later revealed that he had a history of such behaviour or went on to carry out more depraved assaults?

Zero tolerance or over reaction? I still can’t decide. Bottom line silly boob snatching cow should have accepted the warning.
Reply
Old Jul 2, 2006 | 12:40 AM
  #8  
warrenm2's Avatar
warrenm2
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 5,832
Likes: 0
From: Epsom
Default

What harm was really done!? Grow up FFS
Reply
Old Jul 2, 2006 | 12:10 PM
  #9  
alcazar's Avatar
alcazar
Scooby Regular
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 40,788
Likes: 30
From: Rl'yeh
Thumbs down

The law is an ***. No doubt. Because of archaic, or even badly worded modern, wording, any charge/warning can only have a certain form of words.

If you touch someone's leg, you can be charged with "indecent assault". Nothing else. But how is it indecent?

Similarly, the warning almost certainly had to have "sexual touching" in it, as it was the girl's ***** and bra that were interfered with. Nothing else abvailable.

Don't blame her for refusing to accept it, though. Next thing, she'll be on the sex offender's register.

Alcazar
Reply
Old Jul 2, 2006 | 12:22 PM
  #10  
DCI Gene Hunt's Avatar
DCI Gene Hunt
Scooby Senior
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 14,333
Likes: 0
From: RIP - Tam the bam & Andy the Jock
Default

Feckin bra snapping scumbags...... stone them all.........
Reply
Old Jul 2, 2006 | 12:30 PM
  #11  
Leslie's Avatar
Leslie
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 39,877
Likes: 0
Default

A mindbendingly stupid over reaction!

Les
Reply
Old Jul 2, 2006 | 12:34 PM
  #12  
DCI Gene Hunt's Avatar
DCI Gene Hunt
Scooby Senior
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 14,333
Likes: 0
From: RIP - Tam the bam & Andy the Jock
Default

Originally Posted by Leslie
A mindbendingly stupid over reaction!

Les
That we (the tax payers) have just forked out for............
Reply
Old Jul 2, 2006 | 01:15 PM
  #13  
Simon K's Avatar
Simon K
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 928
Likes: 0
Default

Does this mean you will get two years suspended sentance for a wedgy ??

Brumdaisy - Your reaction to this story is amazing ! Sexual act ! hahaha Lets hope we never cross paths when my local rugby team and I are on a rugby tour / drink !!

I think people need to lighten up and starting using common sense.

SBK
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
fatboy_coach
General Technical
15
Jun 18, 2016 03:48 PM
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
28
Dec 28, 2015 11:07 PM
Frizzle-Dee
Essex Subaru Owners Club
13
Dec 1, 2015 09:37 AM
dpb
Non Scooby Related
46
Oct 3, 2015 11:50 AM
Ganz1983
Subaru
5
Oct 2, 2015 09:22 AM




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:47 PM.