Same sex fostering is OK then?
#301
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: somewhere big, expensive and exclusive
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Peanuts
#302
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: somewhere big, expensive and exclusive
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Peanuts
colloquialism
n : a colloquial expression; characteristic of spoken or written communication that seeks to imitate informal speech
Source: WordNet ® 2.0, © 2003 Princeton University
n : a colloquial expression; characteristic of spoken or written communication that seeks to imitate informal speech
Source: WordNet ® 2.0, © 2003 Princeton University
#303
BANNED
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: In my Austrian hole
Posts: 58,500
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by DCI Gene Hunt
Ya know what.... I'm going to give 'being nice' a go!..... So thanks for the faith, I'm off on a mission of niceness...............
#308
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: somewhere big, expensive and exclusive
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Only in a derogatory sense, Les, as well you know. Lots of men and women will be fudge-packing tonight; God, how disgusting is that..?? And so unnatural too.
#309
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (15)
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Portsmouth
Posts: 8,606
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Anne Robinson
Come on then, Peanuts, let's hear it from a different, hopefully less prejudiced angle. In what sense is an activity that humans *choose* to engage in, homosexual and/or heterosexual, that animals engage in without any comprehension (I think we can assume) of "sexuality", so unnatural. I need it spelt out to me please.
From the above two examples, I think we can safely rule out the theory that: because there was an element of choice involved it is right.
Other than that, natural (meaning of nature) is to procreate, you cannot do so as a practising homosexual, vis a vis its not natural
#310
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: somewhere big, expensive and exclusive
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ok, but in what sense is it "wrong"? Just because YOU say so? Sorry, but that isn't good enough, with respect. It's an opinion, but it isn't what some posters are describing as a "fact". On the point of procreation, well oral sex could obviously be included in the sex act, and that doesn't produce babies as far as I'm aware. So how is that natural and **** sex not? Come on, you're an intelligent guy, don't let yourself be blinkered on this issue too.
#311
Originally Posted by Anne Robinson
Ok, but in what sense is it "wrong"? Just because YOU say so? Sorry, but that isn't good enough, with respect. It's an opinion, but it isn't what some posters are describing as a "fact". On the point of procreation, well oral sex could obviously be included in the sex act, and that doesn't produce babies as far as I'm aware. So how is that natural and **** sex not? Come on, you're an intelligent guy, don't let yourself be blinkered on this issue too.
#312
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: somewhere big, expensive and exclusive
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm saying it's natural. I'm saying that homosexuality is natural for a percentage of the population. "Wrongness" is merely a moral viewpoint that only humans can hold. Nodody at all would argue that the awful incident that this thread was originally about was right, because of course it involved somebody who was not able to make a reasoned judgment about what was going on. That's a billion miles away from a consensual homosexual relationship.
#313
Originally Posted by Anne Robinson
I'm saying it's natural. I'm saying that homosexuality is natural for a percentage of the population. "Wrongness" is merely a moral viewpoint that only humans can hold. Nodody at all would argue that the awful incident that this thread was originally about was right, because of course it involved somebody who was not able to make a reasoned judgment about what was going on. That's a billion miles away from a consensual homosexual relationship.
Arguing that it's natural will not get you anywhere - Rape is Natural - Lions don't seem to ask Lionesses if they fancy some rumpy pumpy .
#314
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: somewhere big, expensive and exclusive
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yep, at the end of the day I know that's what it boils down, you're right. I guess the *real* question is when and why our opinions towards homosexuality are formed. Because in my experience, once they are, they rarely change. C'est la vie.
#315
It's when opinions turn to judgement that the problems start.
Being Gay / Black / English / Cat Lover doesn't really pre-dispose you to being anything else - but stereotyping seems to lead us to believe certain things apply to certain groups.
Now that's Natural !
Shame really .
Do as I do - Assume everone is a ***** until they prove otherwise - it works
Being Gay / Black / English / Cat Lover doesn't really pre-dispose you to being anything else - but stereotyping seems to lead us to believe certain things apply to certain groups.
Now that's Natural !
Shame really .
Do as I do - Assume everone is a ***** until they prove otherwise - it works
#316
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 15,271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Leslie
I have made it quite clear that I do not have any prejudice against...ethnic minorities either for that matter.
Originally Posted by leslie
That is what happens in Africa however in order to practice some type of birth control since they can't be bothered to use condoms, and the Aids problem there is out of control.
Originally Posted by leslie
It also leads to disease and this morning the News was stating that Syphilis is on the increase now due to unsafe homosexual practices.
Originally Posted by leslie
Normal sex is designed for making babies
Originally Posted by leslie
All these high flown essays into semantics or taking my words out of context.
Of course without semantics there would be no meaning so we may as well type random letters jwklqwejr jnkjsfop ndddtgb kgjo ndhapoin webntro0nt as=fijjt.
Originally Posted by leslie
You are entitled to disagree with me for my opinions, but not to vilify me.
Having said all of that your defamatory comment regarding a whole continent probably deserves vilification.
#317
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (15)
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Portsmouth
Posts: 8,606
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Anne Robinson
Ok, but in what sense is it "wrong"? Just because YOU say so? Sorry, but that isn't good enough, with respect. It's an opinion, but it isn't what some posters are describing as a "fact". On the point of procreation, well oral sex could obviously be included in the sex act, and that doesn't produce babies as far as I'm aware. So how is that natural and **** sex not? Come on, you're an intelligent guy, don't let yourself be blinkered on this issue too.
Nature's way is to survive.
Survival depends on procreation.
Homosexuals cannot procreate between themselves.
Something isnt necessarily wrong because it is unnatural.
How many westerners have naturally black hair?
How many asians have naturally blond hair?
yet people of both cultures can be seen sporting said hair colour.
Is it against natures intention? yes.
Is it wrong? Hardly.
You can't *change* the meaning of a word by utilising asterisks.
#318
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: somewhere big, expensive and exclusive
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Peanuts, look, it's pretty damned simple. It's been proved beyond reasonable doubt that A percentage of the human population (let's leave animals out of it now) ARE homosexual. Naturally. They're the percentage who won't be adding to the future generations of the human race. Please, please attempt to stop convincing yourself that ALL humans HAVE to be heterosexual, it will make things much, much easier for you to accept what science has already proved. No asterisks required.
#319
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (15)
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Portsmouth
Posts: 8,606
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Anne Robinson
Peanuts, look, it's pretty damned simple. It's been proved beyond reasonable doubt that A percentage of the human population (let's leave animals out of it now) ARE homosexual. Naturally. They're the percentage who won't be adding to the future generations of the human race. Please, please attempt to stop convincing yourself that ALL humans HAVE to be heterosexual, it will make things much, much easier for you to accept what science has already proved. No asterisks required.
It's not "pretty damned simple", if it were so then there wouldn't be constant arguements about the topic. In your eyes it is simple, maybe you haven't fully grasped the depth of the subject or the emotion behind it?
A percentage of the population are homosexual, I whole heartedly agree, but why naturally?
All humans dont have to be heterosexual, nowhere in any of my ramblings have I stated that.
What has science proved exactly? Tell me, I feel I must be missing out on fundamental knowledge that comes so easily to you.
#321
Originally Posted by Peanuts
(You have merely changed your method of inflection to be in upper case capital letters rather than asterisks, dont think I haven't noticed )
#322
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: Cardiff. Wales
Posts: 11,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Anne Robinson
I guess the *real* question is when and why our opinions towards homosexuality are formed. Because in my experience, once they are, they rarely change. C'est la vie.
Nowadays things seem to be different in schools etc with the gay lobby and the Government spending so much time and money promoting the fact that to be "gay is OK". My kids of 15 and 17 even go to the Mardi Gras in Cardiff these days which is something I wouldn't have dreamed of doing at their age and nor would I now.
I would imagine most who have posted on this subject who are against are of the older generation who will have different views to the youngsters on a lot more subjects as well.
Times change and peoples views will change with them. Whether they are right or wrong is irrelevant really as it certainly won't change matters.
Chip
#323
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: Cardiff. Wales
Posts: 11,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Peanuts
A percentage of the population are homosexual, I whole heartedly agree, but why naturally?
Chip
#324
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: somewhere big, expensive and exclusive
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Peanuts
Excuse me for a moment.
It's not "pretty damned simple", if it were so then there wouldn't be constant arguements about the topic. In your eyes it is simple, maybe you haven't fully grasped the depth of the subject or the emotion behind it?
A percentage of the population are homosexual, I whole heartedly agree, but why naturally?
All humans dont have to be heterosexual, nowhere in any of my ramblings have I stated that.
What has science proved exactly? Tell me, I feel I must be missing out on fundamental knowledge that comes so easily to you.
It's not "pretty damned simple", if it were so then there wouldn't be constant arguements about the topic. In your eyes it is simple, maybe you haven't fully grasped the depth of the subject or the emotion behind it?
A percentage of the population are homosexual, I whole heartedly agree, but why naturally?
All humans dont have to be heterosexual, nowhere in any of my ramblings have I stated that.
What has science proved exactly? Tell me, I feel I must be missing out on fundamental knowledge that comes so easily to you.
Not sure how to answer your question about "why naturally", since you've already stated that you accept a given percentage ARE homosexual. Unless of course you're saying that each and every one of them has learned homosexuality and decided to turn their backs on the sexuality they were born with or something. If you still believe THAT (last time!), well there's nothing really more I can say, apart from the fact (word chosen carefully) that it's simply incorrect.
#327
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: somewhere big, expensive and exclusive
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Chip
A percentage of the population are murderers as well. Is that natural then??
Chip
Chip
#328
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: somewhere big, expensive and exclusive
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Peanuts
I am asking what has science proved about homosexuality?
You haven't responded.
You haven't responded.