Glitter found guilty and gets 3 years
#1
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Disco, Disco!
Posts: 21,825
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Glitter found guilty and gets 3 years
But could be out in a year - Not good!
http://uk.news.yahoo.com/03032006/32...tnam-jail.html
Then deported - back to the UK?
http://uk.news.yahoo.com/03032006/32...tnam-jail.html
Then deported - back to the UK?
Trending Topics
#12
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Weston Super Mare, Somerset.
Posts: 14,102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
And wasn't he allowed to pay off families to lessen charges against him????
Should take ALL his assets and give to those poor kids. Evil ****
Should take ALL his assets and give to those poor kids. Evil ****
#13
Does it not strike anyone as odd that he was the first foreigner tried in post-war Vietnam for sex offences?
Smacks of some kind of setup because there must be huge numbers of pedophiles going to Vietnam. (more now with that lenient sentence)
Smacks of some kind of setup because there must be huge numbers of pedophiles going to Vietnam. (more now with that lenient sentence)
#14
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 15,271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by David Lock
And wasn't he allowed to pay off families to lessen charges against him????
Should take ALL his assets and give to those poor kids. Evil ****
Should take ALL his assets and give to those poor kids. Evil ****
If the original charges had stood he would have been facing a firing squad.
He has paid the families off, allegedly.
#15
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
Paedophiles should face "justice" on the level that witches used to.
Instead of Witchfinder Generals there should be Paedofinders. And instead of getting ducked in water with the options of "Drown and you're innocent don't and we'll kill you. Paedophiles should be taken to a tall building, Have a heavy weight tied to they're tackle and then have it thrown off the building. The guilty/innocent verdict should be made upon the outcome of the "Drop". If your tackle gets torn off you must be innocent if it doesn't you can have it removed by a series of cuts with a blunt cleaver by every member of your victims family, who then reattach it and start all over again.
Instead of Witchfinder Generals there should be Paedofinders. And instead of getting ducked in water with the options of "Drown and you're innocent don't and we'll kill you. Paedophiles should be taken to a tall building, Have a heavy weight tied to they're tackle and then have it thrown off the building. The guilty/innocent verdict should be made upon the outcome of the "Drop". If your tackle gets torn off you must be innocent if it doesn't you can have it removed by a series of cuts with a blunt cleaver by every member of your victims family, who then reattach it and start all over again.
Last edited by magepaster; 03 March 2006 at 09:24 PM.
#18
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Never do names esp. Joey, spaz or Mong
Posts: 39,688
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by pslewis
Like was said a month or two ago for Xmas .................
They shouldn't hang decorations in Vietnam this Easter .... just Glitter!!!!
Pete
They shouldn't hang decorations in Vietnam this Easter .... just Glitter!!!!
Pete
#19
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 12,304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
While his past record puts him in a pretty poor light, I was a little surprised that the court case lasted less than a day. There also seemed to be no mention of a jury. I do wonder if Mr Gadd got a fair trial, even if the final outcome was just.
#20
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Zed Ess Won Hay Tee
Posts: 21,611
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by OllyK
While his past record puts him in a pretty poor light, I was a little surprised that the court case lasted less than a day. There also seemed to be no mention of a jury. I do wonder if Mr Gadd got a fair trial, even if the final outcome was just.
#21
Scooby Regular
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Nott'm Home of the Reds
Posts: 6,431
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by OllyK
While his past record puts him in a pretty poor light, I was a little surprised that the court case lasted less than a day. There also seemed to be no mention of a jury. I do wonder if Mr Gadd got a fair trial, even if the final outcome was just.
The old balding pedo git should have been strung up by his *****. then beaten with a foo kin big stick IMHO
#29
Scooby Senior
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Next door
Posts: 4,560
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by magepaster
Paedophiles should face "justice" on the level that witches used to.
Instead of Witchfinder Generals there should be Paedofinders. And instead of getting ducked in water with the options of "Drown and you're innocent don't and we'll kill you. Paedophiles should be taken to a tall building, Have a heavy weight tied to they're tackle and then have it thrown off the building. The guilty/innocent verdict should be made upon the outcome of the "Drop". If your tackle gets torn off you must be innocent if it doesn't you can have it removed by a series of cuts with a blunt cleaver by every member of your victims family, who then reattach it and start all over again.
Instead of Witchfinder Generals there should be Paedofinders. And instead of getting ducked in water with the options of "Drown and you're innocent don't and we'll kill you. Paedophiles should be taken to a tall building, Have a heavy weight tied to they're tackle and then have it thrown off the building. The guilty/innocent verdict should be made upon the outcome of the "Drop". If your tackle gets torn off you must be innocent if it doesn't you can have it removed by a series of cuts with a blunt cleaver by every member of your victims family, who then reattach it and start all over again.
#30
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Strathclyde
Posts: 2,443
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I laughed when people said that Jonathan King remained in the UK and hardly gets mentioned. Why cant Glitter?
Simple, nobody ever liked King as he was a ****, whereas Glitter you used to sing along to his songs/listen to his 'pleas for help' about drugs and alcohol so you sympathised with him. Then he goes humps a 28 year old...... (made up of collective ages of 3 wee girls!!).
I say he should come back here so we sort him out. And none of that PC-crap either.
Simple, nobody ever liked King as he was a ****, whereas Glitter you used to sing along to his songs/listen to his 'pleas for help' about drugs and alcohol so you sympathised with him. Then he goes humps a 28 year old...... (made up of collective ages of 3 wee girls!!).
I say he should come back here so we sort him out. And none of that PC-crap either.