Notices
Non Scooby Related Anything Non-Scooby related

Planning question (in-fill)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 13 November 2005, 09:48 PM
  #1  
Scooby96
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
Scooby96's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 6,086
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Planning question (in-fill)

Looking at the possibility of building a self build on some land of a relative but in order to do so we need to know if there is a minimum width for a drive (shared with relative) as we seem to think there is some rule on minimum widths??

Any ideas?

Edited to add:

Any views on the ease of getting in-fill through planning since Prescott changed things (for the better) - anyone with any experience?

The land in question was subject to 7 complaints when the relative put in a planning application years ago (prior to the change Prescott made).

???

Last edited by Scooby96; 13 November 2005 at 09:54 PM.
Old 13 November 2005, 11:48 PM
  #2  
LG John
Scooby Regular
 
LG John's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Bradford
Posts: 13,720
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Whether the applicaiton will be a goer and whether there are minimum widths for driveways will vary from Planning Authority to Planning Authority. Unless there is a development control planner on here from the area in question then nobody on SN can answer this one. You'll just have to call the duty planner tomorrow
Old 14 November 2005, 08:46 AM
  #3  
ronny555
Scooby Regular
 
ronny555's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 415
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wink

Usually 2.7m, can go down to 2.4m
Old 14 November 2005, 09:02 AM
  #4  
LG John
Scooby Regular
 
LG John's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Bradford
Posts: 13,720
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Incidently most authorities are less interested in width and more interested in length If people bash their doors in your development that is their/your problem but if a driveway it too short it can be a road safety hazard.
Old 14 November 2005, 09:07 AM
  #5  
richardg
Scooby Regular
 
richardg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: essex, then chongqing, china and now essex again
Posts: 2,568
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

if it's back-land development you're suggesting, then you'll need to find other info to support that
a friend of mine has been battling with the lpa for something similar in our area for a while now and is on his second appeal. whilst there are a number of sites with a recent consent in the locality following the same principles and at much higher densities, he is struggling.
distance from back edge of highway to proposed dwelling may be an issue (fire appliance access, refuse collection etc). the duty officer is the person to speak to. if you can't fit a formal driveway in, is is practical to put "parking" at the position where the driveway would start and then a "large footpath" to the proposed dwelling position?
Old 14 November 2005, 02:06 PM
  #6  
Scooby96
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
Scooby96's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 6,086
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks - anyone else?
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
KAS35RSTI
Subaru
27
04 November 2021 07:12 PM
Frizzle-Dee
Essex Subaru Owners Club
13
01 December 2015 09:37 AM
Brzoza
Engine Management and ECU Remapping
1
02 October 2015 05:26 PM
Phil3822
General Technical
0
30 September 2015 06:29 PM
WrxSti03
Drivetrain
11
29 September 2015 10:21 AM



Quick Reply: Planning question (in-fill)



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:19 AM.