Notices
Non Scooby Related Anything Non-Scooby related

Trains: Poor rail adhesion

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09 November 2005, 12:28 PM
  #1  
MikT
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
MikT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question Trains: Poor rail adhesion

Being unfortunate enough to commute on the choo choo and listening to their varying excuses for cancellations and delays, the latest one that has cropped up is the "poor rail adhesion".

Does anyone know if this is the latest phrase for "leaves on the track" or does it mean something else?

Thanks
Paul
Old 09 November 2005, 12:45 PM
  #2  
trackman
Scooby Regular
 
trackman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 277
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Yes it is. I work on rail maintenance (hence the obvious username) and at this time of year the leaves are obviously falling.

They land on some areas of the track, get compacted down by trains and form a very greasy film on the rail-head. It's the railway equivalent of black ice.
Old 09 November 2005, 12:53 PM
  #3  
Nigel H
Scooby Regular
 
Nigel H's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Essex
Posts: 1,115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

It's a real problem; it's very slippy and difficult to get rid of. Network Rail spend millions of ponds a year managing the problem, cutting down trees spreading Sandite (wall paper paste and sand) on rails over night to combat

Modern trains can cope with it better than old trains. Some operators produce special timetables where journey times are extended due to the poor adhesion (e.g. Metropolitan Line)

An insider
Old 09 November 2005, 12:58 PM
  #4  
CrisPDuk
Scooby Regular
 
CrisPDuk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: The Cheshire end of the emasculated Cat & Fiddle
Posts: 9,465
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The problem is more prevalent than it used to be for one reason alone, these days because Network Rail get no end of grief from enviromentalists (more concerned with ickle bunnies than commuters) when they cut back the trees, they don't cut them back as far as they used too.

Of course in the 'good old days' if they didn't cut them back, sparks from the exhaust of a steam train soon cured the problem
Old 09 November 2005, 12:59 PM
  #5  
_RIP_
BANNED
 
_RIP_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,675
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Why dont they put some sort of scraper in front of the wheels? Or am I missing something here?
Old 09 November 2005, 01:00 PM
  #6  
NotoriousREV
Scooby Regular
 
NotoriousREV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 11,581
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by _RIP_
Why dont they put some sort or scraper in front of the wheels? Or am I missing something here?
Think of the noise and the drag and the damage to the rail itself.
Old 09 November 2005, 01:01 PM
  #7  
urban
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
urban's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Never you mind
Posts: 12,566
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by _RIP_
Why dont they put some sort of scraper in front of the wheels? Or am I missing something here?
Because of the joints in the tracks I'd imagine.
Old 09 November 2005, 01:01 PM
  #8  
_RIP_
BANNED
 
_RIP_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,675
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Hmm. But trains are noisy anyway and the rails look pretty tough to me.
Old 09 November 2005, 01:02 PM
  #9  
_RIP_
BANNED
 
_RIP_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,675
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by urban
Because of the joints in the tracks I'd imagine.
Yes that's more like it. Forgot about the joints.
Old 09 November 2005, 01:09 PM
  #10  
trackman
Scooby Regular
 
trackman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 277
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Network Rail have introduced a machine that effectively jetwashes the rail-head as it goes along. I think It's being trialled in low adhesion areas at the moment.
Old 09 November 2005, 01:15 PM
  #11  
David Lock
Scooby Regular
 
David Lock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Weston Super Mare, Somerset.
Posts: 14,102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by _RIP_
Why dont they put some sort of scraper in front of the wheels? Or am I missing something here?

I've often wondered that. Something like a wire or bristle brush that is spring loaded and forced down onto the rails. This would ride over any joints. Of course it would wear quickly but easy and cheap to replace regularly I would have thought..........
Old 09 November 2005, 01:17 PM
  #12  
CooperS
Scooby Regular
 
CooperS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,848
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I saw a program the other day about a guy who's invented a 5000 degree celcius laser that burns them off from a specially adapted train, just trying to perfect it before selling it, it was awesome
Old 09 November 2005, 01:19 PM
  #13  
NotoriousREV
Scooby Regular
 
NotoriousREV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 11,581
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by _RIP_
Hmm. But trains are noisy anyway and the rails look pretty tough to me.
Yes, but that doesn't mean adding a the sound of a scraping blade travelling at 125mph (or 12.5mph for most of the country) is acceptable.

The track are tough, but how many trains pass a particular stretch of track a day? The increased wear would probably cause more problems than scraping the leaves off as they shut entire sections of track for rail replacement.
Old 09 November 2005, 01:20 PM
  #14  
Dracoro
Scooby Regular
 
Dracoro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: A powerslide near you
Posts: 10,261
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by CooperS
I saw a program the other day about a guy who's invented a 5000 degree celcius laser that burns them off from a specially adapted train, just trying to perfect it before selling it, it was awesome
Fire risk anyone?
Old 09 November 2005, 01:22 PM
  #15  
Brendan Hughes
Scooby Regular
 
Brendan Hughes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: same time, different place
Posts: 11,313
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Thumbs up

Originally Posted by CrisPDuk
The problem is more prevalent than it used to be for one reason alone, these days because Network Rail get no end of grief from enviromentalists (more concerned with ickle bunnies than commuters) when they cut back the trees, they don't cut them back as far as they used too.

Of course in the 'good old days' if they didn't cut them back, sparks from the exhaust of a steam train soon cured the problem
Finally an answer why the same seasonal characteristics we've had for the last 100 years are only affecting us in the last 10-20. Thankyou.
Old 09 November 2005, 01:38 PM
  #16  
ALi-B
Moderator
Support Scoobynet!
iTrader: (1)
 
ALi-B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: The hell where youth and laughter go
Posts: 38,034
Received 301 Likes on 240 Posts
Default

The last greasy rail excuse I heard blamed that the problem only came more apparent when they started using modern braking systems. Older trains and rolling stock had brake shoes that use the wheels as the braking surface. Thus cleaning the wheels that made contact with the track. Personally, I think that is mostly rubbish.

Do newer trains have ABS? And would this make the problem worse? As friction/heat caused by locked wheels would in effect clean the track, if they did use ABS then maybe this wouldn't remove the crap off the track?
Old 09 November 2005, 02:04 PM
  #17  
MikT
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
MikT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

WOW - the wonders of NSR!

Thanks for all the replies - particularly to those in the know.

Paul
Old 09 November 2005, 02:30 PM
  #18  
CooperS
Scooby Regular
 
CooperS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,848
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Dracoro
Fire risk anyone?
Hehe

Honestly, looked quality, you could touch the track immediately after the laser had been past, you could see the mashed on leaves disappearing.
Old 09 November 2005, 03:21 PM
  #19  
Jay m A
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Jay m A's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Class record holder at Pembrey Llandow Goodwood MIRA Hethel Blyton Curborough Lydden and Snetterton
Posts: 8,626
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by trackman
Network Rail have introduced a machine that effectively jetwashes the rail-head as it goes along. I think It's being trialled in low adhesion areas at the moment.
Ah ha! that was the thing that went past the other day. Made a right misty racket!

PPPPPPSSSSSSSSsssssssssshhhhhhhhhhhhh
Old 10 November 2005, 08:06 AM
  #20  
Nigel H
Scooby Regular
 
Nigel H's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Essex
Posts: 1,115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Ali

The 'excuse' about the new systems is correct. The old brake systems conditioned the wheel by removing all the crud thus keeping things nice and clean. Dead leaves are extremely sticky and slippy, removal is difficult.

Trains have had ABS (and 'Traction Control') for many years now, well before it was fitted to cars.
Old 10 November 2005, 09:18 AM
  #21  
Chelspeed
Scooby Regular
 
Chelspeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 1,873
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Steel wheels on steel rails. And then everyone acts all surprised when there are braking and traction problems?

Can you imagine driving a car with steel tyres? Even less grip than with Michelins.....

Surely there must be better solutions with the materials available today? Maglev is one solution but still a bit futuristic. Steel wheels for guidance, long life etc but something a bit less tribologically challenged for traction and braking perhaps?
Old 10 November 2005, 12:13 PM
  #22  
MikT
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
MikT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wink

Originally Posted by Chelspeed
Steel wheels on steel rails. And then everyone acts all surprised when there are braking and traction problems?
I don't think anyone in this thread is surprised by the steel wheels on steel rails issue. The question was to do with what the lack of adhesion related to!

Paul
Old 10 November 2005, 12:26 PM
  #24  
Leslie
Scooby Regular
 
Leslie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 39,877
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Wet leaves are not ever so good on the road either. especially to bikers!

Les
Old 10 November 2005, 12:35 PM
  #25  
ALi-B
Moderator
Support Scoobynet!
iTrader: (1)
 
ALi-B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: The hell where youth and laughter go
Posts: 38,034
Received 301 Likes on 240 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Nigel H
Ali

The 'excuse' about the new systems is correct. The old brake systems conditioned the wheel by removing all the crud thus keeping things nice and clean. Dead leaves are extremely sticky and slippy, removal is difficult.

Trains have had ABS (and 'Traction Control') for many years now, well before it was fitted to cars.
I agree the wheels would have been kept clean, but it doesn't really address the problem with the greasy track. Which is why I suspected that story isn't completely true.

Would I still be right in saying locked wheels would have more effect at stopping a train on greasy tracks through heat/friction burning and wearing through the greasy layer on the track as opposed to ABS allowing the wheels to rotate?
Old 10 November 2005, 12:46 PM
  #26  
CrisPDuk
Scooby Regular
 
CrisPDuk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: The Cheshire end of the emasculated Cat & Fiddle
Posts: 9,465
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Chelspeed
Steel wheels on steel rails. And then everyone acts all surprised when there are braking and traction problems?
You're obviously not an engineer, or you would know that steel on steel is an excellent recipe for good traction, it's when you introduce a lubricant that the fun starts

Originally Posted by ALi-B
The last greasy rail excuse I heard blamed that the problem only came more apparent when they started using modern braking systems. Older trains and rolling stock had brake shoes that use the wheels as the braking surface. Thus cleaning the wheels that made contact with the track. Personally, I think that is mostly rubbish.

Do newer trains have ABS? And would this make the problem worse? As friction/heat caused by locked wheels would in effect clean the track, if they did use ABS then maybe this wouldn't remove the crap off the track?
Older trains used a pair of brake blocks clamping the wheel tread, which wore out the wheels as well as the brakes, moder locomotives have each axle individually driven by an electric traction motor, simplified, braking is effected by turning the motor into a generator thereby creating a drag load on the axle, slowing down the train, with no touching parts there is no wear. None powered stock, i.e: coaches and wagons, have had disc brakes since the early seventies.

Incidentally, when electrification was first introduced from London to Manchester & Liverpool, the first generation electric locomotives (before regenerative braking) needed their brake shoes changing once per WEEK
Old 10 November 2005, 01:02 PM
  #27  
vindaloo
Scooby Regular
 
vindaloo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: South Bucks
Posts: 3,213
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Aren't there two problems?

How to keep the line clean and how to keep the trains' wheels clean.

Q1 Line: Does the entire line have to be clean? Surely there are obvious areas where it's better to have enhanced friction such as approaching signals and gradients.

Q2 Train wheels: Fit something to clean them at certain stations (as the wheel passes), preferably as the train slows and enters the station.

I don't see that every train or carraige in service has to scrape, spray or laser the tracks. Surely once or twice a day would do.

J.
Old 10 November 2005, 01:28 PM
  #28  
alcazar
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
alcazar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Rl'yeh
Posts: 40,781
Received 27 Likes on 25 Posts
Default

As regards the reason why it's only recently become a problem, it's due to the growth of trees near the tracks.

The old steam locos effectively cleared the vegetation on a regular basis by firing it. Then diesels/electrics took over at the end of the 60's, and trees began to grow again.

British Rail, yes the much maligned, and now, much mourned, once did a good job of clearing vegetation, mostly before it got to be a problem.

Now, money talks.........no-one wants the job. It no longer gets done. You only have to look at weed growth in station areas etc......something British Rail would NEVER allow. It absolutely KILLS the ballast.

If you look at some of the railway publications, there is a series carrying photos showing trains at the same location, "then and now", (then being 50's 60's mostly). The most noticable thing, in almost every case, (apart from the stock and loco, of course) is the lack of vegetation then, and the massive increase now.

Alcazar
Old 10 November 2005, 04:42 PM
  #29  
trackman
Scooby Regular
 
trackman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 277
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Well this is what I drive and it uses the older brake block mechanism. You just have to be careful with your braking thats all. You get plenty of warning of double yellow, single yellow and red signals. You just have to brake accordingly.

When you sign a particular route, you are made aware of all the low adhesion areas and you drive with extra caution. I don't know if there will ever be a full cure for poor traction but until then I'll drive safely .

(Hope this works)

http://i22.photobucket.com/albums/b3...emplemeads.jpg

Last edited by trackman; 10 November 2005 at 04:47 PM.
Old 10 November 2005, 04:44 PM
  #30  
trackman
Scooby Regular
 
trackman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 277
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Damn it! Knew it wouldn't work.

Last edited by trackman; 10 November 2005 at 04:48 PM. Reason: edited to say it works now, me and t'internet don't get on.


Quick Reply: Trains: Poor rail adhesion



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:28 PM.