The latest in a long line of "I don't Believe it" News ...
#1
BANNED
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Jasey@Work
Posts: 2,507
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The latest in a long line of "I don't Believe it" News ...
Take a deep breath and relax before you read this
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/4296976.stm
A man who won £7m on Lotto Extra while jailed for rape is to be relocated after being tracked down by the Sun newspaper, the Home Office has said.
Iorworth *****, 52, originally from Leeds, who has reportedly changed his name to Edward Thomas, was spotted walking through Sunderland city centre.
The Sun says a £10,000-a-month Home Office operation has been protecting his identity since his March release.
The Home Office refused to comment on the amount of taxpayers' money spent.
A spokesman told BBC News ***** would continue to be protected from "intrusion" for the foreseeable future.
***** needed protection "for the benefit of society", the spokesman added.
"We are trying to rehabilitate this man into the community. We will have to move him now." But Sun managing editor Graham Dudman told BBC News it was outrageous "the British taxpayer is paying for him to be moved around the country in safe houses... putting somebody up, feeding him... letting him have a television to watch and heating his house while he has got seven million pounds in the bank".
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/4296976.stm
A man who won £7m on Lotto Extra while jailed for rape is to be relocated after being tracked down by the Sun newspaper, the Home Office has said.
Iorworth *****, 52, originally from Leeds, who has reportedly changed his name to Edward Thomas, was spotted walking through Sunderland city centre.
The Sun says a £10,000-a-month Home Office operation has been protecting his identity since his March release.
The Home Office refused to comment on the amount of taxpayers' money spent.
A spokesman told BBC News ***** would continue to be protected from "intrusion" for the foreseeable future.
***** needed protection "for the benefit of society", the spokesman added.
"We are trying to rehabilitate this man into the community. We will have to move him now." But Sun managing editor Graham Dudman told BBC News it was outrageous "the British taxpayer is paying for him to be moved around the country in safe houses... putting somebody up, feeding him... letting him have a television to watch and heating his house while he has got seven million pounds in the bank".
Last edited by Reality; 30 September 2005 at 01:55 PM.
#7
Maxine Carr did not murder anyone. Her crime - for which she has been tried, convicted an punished - was to stuggle to believe the man she loved was a child murderer.
The fact we as taxpayers now need to spend money to protect is her is down soley to the media and the viligante mob rule attitude they encourage in the general public. She herself is NOT a danger to the general public, however it would seem the general public are a real danger to her.
The fact we as taxpayers now need to spend money to protect is her is down soley to the media and the viligante mob rule attitude they encourage in the general public. She herself is NOT a danger to the general public, however it would seem the general public are a real danger to her.
Trending Topics
#8
Scooby Senior
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Passing ...............
Posts: 13,320
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
She was in scotland last year & got recognised, so they moved her again
Living in a 5 Bedroom Detached house & the taxpayer has to foot the bill
Living in a 5 Bedroom Detached house & the taxpayer has to foot the bill
#9
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Please excuse my Spelling - its not the best !!
Posts: 2,538
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Iorworth ***** should be encouraged to pay a percentage of his own protection costs. Not like he can't afford it !
Maxine Carr should be offered and postively encouraged to leave the country and go and live somewhere else for her own safety and protection of course.
5od it Just give them both a free one way ticket to anywhere in the world and tell them the money would be best spent else and this is the end of your protection!
Richard
Maxine Carr should be offered and postively encouraged to leave the country and go and live somewhere else for her own safety and protection of course.
5od it Just give them both a free one way ticket to anywhere in the world and tell them the money would be best spent else and this is the end of your protection!
Richard
#10
Originally Posted by dsmith
Maxine Carr did not murder anyone. Her crime - for which she has been tried, convicted an punished - was to stuggle to believe the man she loved was a child murderer.
The fact we as taxpayers now need to spend money to protect is her is down soley to the media and the viligante mob rule attitude they encourage in the general public. She herself is NOT a danger to the general public, however it would seem the general public are a real danger to her.
The fact we as taxpayers now need to spend money to protect is her is down soley to the media and the viligante mob rule attitude they encourage in the general public. She herself is NOT a danger to the general public, however it would seem the general public are a real danger to her.
She was tried and hanged by the media. She may be a silly, deluded cow but that's not a reason to hang her out to dry.
#11
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Manchester
Posts: 665
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by SJ_Skyline
Spot on!
She was tried and hanged by the media. She may be a silly, deluded cow but that's not a reason to hang her out to dry.
She was tried and hanged by the media. She may be a silly, deluded cow but that's not a reason to hang her out to dry.
#12
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Manchester
Posts: 665
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by davegtt
OMG, so a guy whos got like £7m in the bank and the government are paying to relocate the t\/\/at????
typical.
typical.
#13
Scooby Senior
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Next door to the WiFi connection
Posts: 16,293
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well I think theres a reasonable level, we've relocated him once. DONE!!!! no more our responsibility to keep him nice and safe, the guy is a rapist. not like hes being put in Witness protection is it? If hes unsafe int he public eye then keep him locked up. Im sick of seeing our money being pumped into looking after those who dont deserve it, especially since theyre Millionaires too
#14
BANNED
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Jasey@Work
Posts: 2,507
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Andrew Dixon
So how's this going to work then? Do we means-test funding for Police protection?
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/4296976.stm
"Harry Fletcher, the general secretary of probation union Napo, urged ministers to consider means-testing offenders who need supervision and protection. "
ME -
This Government offers no protection to ordinary people from the pervs / nutters they let loose on the streets - why the **** should we pay to protect them from ordinary people ?
#15
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Manchester
Posts: 665
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Reality
This Government offers no protection to ordinary people from the pervs / nutters they let loose on the streets - why the **** should we pay to protect them from ordinary people ?
What on earth is the point of courts, prison, rehabilitation, etc. if we are simply going to release people into the hands of revenge obsessed vigilantes who can't accept the fact that our modern society has a criminal justice system?
#16
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Talk to the hand....
Posts: 13,331
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The Sun's managing editor Graham Dudman told BBC News it was "outrageous" that the British taxpayer had to pay for ***** to be put up in safe houses and fed when he had £7m in the bank.
I'm in Southern California ATM and looking at Blair's Britain from the outside I'm in no rush to go back there. What a depressing s**thole they have turned the country into.
#17
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Sheffield; Rome of the North
Posts: 17,582
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Andrew Dixon
So how's this going to work then? Do we means-test funding for Police protection?
Simon
#18
Originally Posted by Andrew Dixon
Very well said. The only reason the 'taxpayer' is being forced to pay to protect her anonymity is due to the proportion of 'taxpayers' who want to make her a scapegoat for the evil doings of her former boyfriend.
#19
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Croydon (ish)
Posts: 1,887
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The Irony is that "The Sun" hounding this bloke makes him require protection more.
Theres hundreds of convicted rapists in the country. The difference is the tabloids aren't jealous (or dont know if) a rapist has won the lottery.
Theres hundreds of convicted rapists in the country. The difference is the tabloids aren't jealous (or dont know if) a rapist has won the lottery.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Scott@ScoobySpares
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
55
05 August 2018 07:02 AM
Scott@ScoobySpares
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
7
14 December 2015 08:16 AM