Air incident wild speculation required
#1
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: No longer Japan !
Posts: 1,742
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Air incident wild speculation required
For the pilot's on here, can you provide any explanation for the following story from here ?
Pilot didn't know he'd lost half a wing
A pilot flew his plane for two hours without realising he was missing half a wing.
His passengers - two flight engineers on their way to repair a Boeing 767 - also failed to spot it had been ripped off, taking a fuel tank with it.
Their Cessna 210's wing was split in two when it hit a tree on take-off from an airstrip near Shannon in Ireland, reports the Mirror.
The pilot later said he heard a bang but thought he had just hit a small bird.
He only realised what had happened when he spotted his back-up fuel tank gauge was on empty as he flew over the Channel on the way to Portugal.
He put out a Mayday call and landed at Jersey airport.
A spokesman there said last night: "We were amazed it managed to fly as long as it had. It was in a real state.
"The pilot was the most shocked as he had not realised the extent of the damage while he was flying."
Could a pilot of a Cessna 210 seriously not notice they'd lost half a wing? Or is this another example of gross journalistic sloppiness?
Pilot didn't know he'd lost half a wing
A pilot flew his plane for two hours without realising he was missing half a wing.
His passengers - two flight engineers on their way to repair a Boeing 767 - also failed to spot it had been ripped off, taking a fuel tank with it.
Their Cessna 210's wing was split in two when it hit a tree on take-off from an airstrip near Shannon in Ireland, reports the Mirror.
The pilot later said he heard a bang but thought he had just hit a small bird.
He only realised what had happened when he spotted his back-up fuel tank gauge was on empty as he flew over the Channel on the way to Portugal.
He put out a Mayday call and landed at Jersey airport.
A spokesman there said last night: "We were amazed it managed to fly as long as it had. It was in a real state.
"The pilot was the most shocked as he had not realised the extent of the damage while he was flying."
Could a pilot of a Cessna 210 seriously not notice they'd lost half a wing? Or is this another example of gross journalistic sloppiness?
#2
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Jaguar 3.0 sport now bought, Am loving it!!!!!
Posts: 7,653
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm no piolet but I'm damm sure I'd known I'd lost half a wing, the alarm bells in the cockpit must have been going mad, though I maybe wrong, proberly total rubbish fom the press, Cue Leslie
Cheers
Colin
Cheers
Colin
#3
Wouldn't have thought a light aircraft like a little Cessna has much more than a stall warner buzzer in terms of 'alarm bells' in the cockpit, but where it would really manifest itself would be in control of the aircraft - one wing being bigger would generate more lift, so you'd constantly be using the ailerons to keep the wings level. Plus it sounds a bit sloppy if his first fuel check was over the channel. And to be honest it sounds a bit sloppy not to turn your head to see this! ...
Have a look at http://www.pprune.org/forums/showthr...hreadid=185783
Have a look at http://www.pprune.org/forums/showthr...hreadid=185783
Last edited by Dieseldog; 20 August 2005 at 08:47 AM.
#4
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Arborfield, Berkshire
Posts: 12,387
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Dieseldog
Wouldn't have thought a light aircraft like a little Cessna has much more than a stall warner buzzer in terms of 'alarm bells' in the cockpit, but where it would really manifest itself would be in control of the aircraft - one wing being bigger would generate more lift, so you'd constantly be using the ailerons to keep the wings level. Plus it sounds a bit sloppy if his first fuel check was over the channel. And to be honest it sounds a bit sloppy not to turn your head to see this! ...
Have a look at http://www.pprune.org/forums/showthr...hreadid=185783
Have a look at http://www.pprune.org/forums/showthr...hreadid=185783
Simon.
#7
I thought that was a pretty amazing story too!
I was giving an air cadets pilot a check ride once in a Chipmunk out of White Waltham. I asked him to do a loop and he was a bit nervous, about halfway round the loop there was a lurch and I saw that the fabric covering which was on the top rear half of the starboard wing was detached at the front and was trailing back over the flaps and ailerons. I took control and recovered to level flight and when the other bloke saw the damage he was set to jump out on his parachute at first!
It seemed to fly alright so I went back to the airfield and landed a bit fast for extra control with no problem. I was surprised how well it continued to fly even though we could see and count all the ribs in the wing. It turned out there was a right and wrong way to attach the fabric to the aluminium wing and guess which way this one had been done!
Les
I was giving an air cadets pilot a check ride once in a Chipmunk out of White Waltham. I asked him to do a loop and he was a bit nervous, about halfway round the loop there was a lurch and I saw that the fabric covering which was on the top rear half of the starboard wing was detached at the front and was trailing back over the flaps and ailerons. I took control and recovered to level flight and when the other bloke saw the damage he was set to jump out on his parachute at first!
It seemed to fly alright so I went back to the airfield and landed a bit fast for extra control with no problem. I was surprised how well it continued to fly even though we could see and count all the ribs in the wing. It turned out there was a right and wrong way to attach the fabric to the aluminium wing and guess which way this one had been done!
Les
Trending Topics
#8
Originally Posted by Leslie
there was a lurch and I saw that the fabric covering which was on the top rear half of the starboard wing was detached at the front and was trailing back over the flaps and ailerons.
#11
I remember seeing a picture of an F15 eagle which was missing everything outward from the root of his right wing. you could see the vulcan cannon and everything.
Pilot still landed it as the F15 produces a lot of bodylift, so anything is possible.
astraboy.
Pilot still landed it as the F15 produces a lot of bodylift, so anything is possible.
astraboy.
#12
Ah, here you go, the actual page is gone, but google still has the pic on its cache.
astraboy.
http://images.google.co.uk/imgres?im...3Doff%26sa%3DN
astraboy.
http://images.google.co.uk/imgres?im...3Doff%26sa%3DN
#13
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: WYIOC. The Foxglove, Kirkburton, Huddersfield.
Posts: 5,400
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by yoza
I once lost 4 dust caps, never noticed a thing until I washed my wheels, and there they were....gone !
I was really lucky.
I was really lucky.
#14
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: www.tiovicente.com
Posts: 2,006
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So he confuses hitting a tree with a bird strike and then fails to notice the damage to the wing whilst failing to monitor his fuel. Shouldn't be allowed to fly.
#16
They should use this story to help people get over their flying fears.
Look - they don't even need wings to keep up in the air
Although the picture might scare them a little
Look - they don't even need wings to keep up in the air
Although the picture might scare them a little
#17
Scooby Regular
The scary thing was the fact that his passengers, flight engineers on their way to fix a grounded airliner, didn't notice bits of the plane were missing either! Was ANYBODY looking out the fecking windows when, or after, the tree was hit
#19
Originally Posted by Leslie
Might not have been able to see the damage so plainly looking at it from inside the 'plane.
Les
Les
All sounds a little dodgy / scarey to me - When was the pilots last eye / hearing test .
#20
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: www.tiovicente.com
Posts: 2,006
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Leslie
Might not have been able to see the damage so plainly looking at it from inside the 'plane.
Les
Les
This guy failed to carry out even the most rudimentary of scans, didn't manage his fuel situation and given that he was providing an air taxi service (I presume) he must have an ATPL/IR etc so again you'd assume a reasonable level of professionalism which if the reports are accurate - he didn't display.
#21
Yes I meant that looking at the wing from the cockpit angle may not have shown the damage so easily as looking at it from the photo angle as horrific as it seems.
You are quite correct of course about lookout from a high winger, it does block the inside view in a turn. I taught enough ab initio pilots too so I should know.
Did not know the rest of the details as you say, he should do all that as second nature especially with those licences. I have known enough pilots who having reached a few flying hours in the log book without incident, become a bit over familiar with the job and that is when disaster can strike before you know it. The margins are not that wide in flying as you will know very well.
Les
You are quite correct of course about lookout from a high winger, it does block the inside view in a turn. I taught enough ab initio pilots too so I should know.
Did not know the rest of the details as you say, he should do all that as second nature especially with those licences. I have known enough pilots who having reached a few flying hours in the log book without incident, become a bit over familiar with the job and that is when disaster can strike before you know it. The margins are not that wide in flying as you will know very well.
Les
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Pro-Line Motorsport
Car Parts For Sale
2
29 September 2015 07:36 PM