That'll teach him!!!!!
21 June 2005, 01:40 PM
#1
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
That'll teach him!!!!!
Ha, ****!
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.d...556985749&rd=1
http://www.ananova.com/news/story/sm_1436341.html
Apologies if its SIAL.
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.d...556985749&rd=1
http://www.ananova.com/news/story/sm_1436341.html
Apologies if its SIAL.
Trending Topics
21 June 2005, 02:43 PM
#10
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: New Jack City
Posts: 1,500
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Dracoro
LOL 
Did he cheat or just flirt? If the former then serves him right If the latter, she needs help.
Did he cheat or just flirt? If the former then serves him right
If the latter, she needs help.Maybe it's all a publicity stunt for the DJ and the radio station?
21 June 2005, 02:43 PM
#11
Scooby Regular
I'm sorry, but if the brain dead **** stated live on air that he'd leave his wife & kids for a fukugly Jordan wannabe, I'd say his missus is well and truly within her rights to bin him, on grounds of taste alone
21 June 2005, 03:47 PM
#13
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,486
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by +Doc+
Publicity stunt IMO, how convenient a first time ebayer found the advert and bought it.
21 June 2005, 04:31 PM
#15
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: The Great White North
Posts: 25,080
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I tend to agree with the publicity stunt theory.
This seems to be an ebay version of this popular urban legend.
I thought the registered keeper, as listed on the V5, was indicative of the "owner" of the car, and thus is the person legally responsible for the car.
This seems to be an ebay version of this popular urban legend.
I thought the registered keeper, as listed on the V5, was indicative of the "owner" of the car, and thus is the person legally responsible for the car.
21 June 2005, 04:39 PM
#16
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
According to a lad on overclockers he has mailed the winner and the winner confirms it to be ture and even reckons he offered it back for £15K.
Tend to feel it is a stunt too TBH. While your on ebay check the last thing she bought from her feedback
Tend to feel it is a stunt too TBH. While your on ebay check the last thing she bought from her feedback
21 June 2005, 04:42 PM
#17
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Originally Posted by ajm
Am I right in thinking that the log book is not proof of ownership? The car may be legally his, so she could be guilty of theft!
I'm on the V5 for my GFs car but she insures it in her name. The tax comes on my name.
I bought my Impreza from the guys wife. She owned it and he was a named driver on her insurance.
21 June 2005, 05:29 PM
#20
Moderator
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: The Terry Crews of moderation. P P P P P P POWER!!
Posts: 18,687
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by lightning101
I hope he hunts her down and tortures her, then guts her like pig 
So, an unexpected response from the Labour candidate
NS04
21 June 2005, 05:34 PM
#21
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: New Jack City
Posts: 1,500
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by EddScott
If she is on the V5 is she not the owner?
I'm on the V5 for my GFs car but she insures it in her name. The tax comes on my name.
I'm on the V5 for my GFs car but she insures it in her name. The tax comes on my name.
21 June 2005, 07:05 PM
#22
Scooby Regular
Originally Posted by OllyK
Why has 1 person bought 8 copies of Mr Tickle off her at 10p a time?
PS re: insurance, according to my broker, the person named on the V5 MUST be named on the insurance policy.
21 June 2005, 10:56 PM
#25
Scooby Regular
Originally Posted by Jap2Scrap
My thoughts exactly. How jammy would you have to be to luck on that as a first timer. Not to mention having time to register and work out all the bidding rigmarole before someone else spotted it.
22 June 2005, 08:40 AM
#26
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Stroke it baby!
Posts: 33,828
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
two things
1, you can insure a car even if you are no the registered keeper, in your name, as long as your "partner" owns the car. This used to be spouse but p/cness had to make it fair for gay couples
2, Being the registered keeper is not the same as being the owner. If he can proove he paid for the car, then yes she could be guilty of theft
1, you can insure a car even if you are no the registered keeper, in your name, as long as your "partner" owns the car. This used to be spouse but p/cness had to make it fair for gay couples
2, Being the registered keeper is not the same as being the owner. If he can proove he paid for the car, then yes she could be guilty of theft
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Scoobyebye
Non Scooby Related
6
16 August 2001 11:46 AM