If smoking cost the NHS £1.9bn and cigarette sales generate £9bn then
#1
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Disco, Disco!
Posts: 21,825
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If smoking cost the NHS £1.9bn and cigarette sales generate £9bn then
how is the extra revinue goning to be generated to cover the £7bn shortfall to the treasury?
Health issues aside
Being smokes contribute £7bn
Fuel duty
NI
any thoughts???
Health issues aside
Being smokes contribute £7bn
Fuel duty
NI
any thoughts???
#2
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Swilling coffee at my lab bench
Posts: 9,096
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Don't forget the cost of people taking time off work due to smoking related illnesses, who are claiming benefits instead of paying taxes.
Personally I'd happily pay an extra few quid on income tax, in return for the ability to go out at night and not come back stinking like an ash tray.
Personally I'd happily pay an extra few quid on income tax, in return for the ability to go out at night and not come back stinking like an ash tray.
#3
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 12,304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by AndyC_772
Don't forget the cost of people taking time off work due to smoking related illnesses, who are claiming benefits instead of paying taxes.
Personally I'd happily pay an extra few quid on income tax, in return for the ability to go out at night and not come back stinking like an ash tray.
Personally I'd happily pay an extra few quid on income tax, in return for the ability to go out at night and not come back stinking like an ash tray.
#4
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Lincolnshire
Posts: 15,623
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Smoking is a disgusting habit anyway,forget the money issue.
Why its cool to pay to give yourself cancer,ruin your lungs and give yourself crap skin in old age is beyond me.
Why its cool to pay to give yourself cancer,ruin your lungs and give yourself crap skin in old age is beyond me.
#5
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 12,304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by paulr
Smoking is a disgusting habit anyway,forget the money issue.
Why its cool to pay to give yourself cancer,ruin your lungs and give yourself crap skin in old age is beyond me.
Why its cool to pay to give yourself cancer,ruin your lungs and give yourself crap skin in old age is beyond me.
#6
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Disco, Disco!
Posts: 21,825
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by paulr
Smoking is a disgusting habit anyway,forget the money issue.
Why its cool to pay to give yourself cancer,ruin your lungs and give yourself crap skin in old age is beyond me.
Why its cool to pay to give yourself cancer,ruin your lungs and give yourself crap skin in old age is beyond me.
Perhaps if i had typed a bit slower you would have been able to understand my original post
I am interested in the money side.
I understand the health issues including passive smoking.
I am interested in where the extra ££££'s are coming from to cover ths shortfall of £9bn if all smokers packed it in.
Trending Topics
#8
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Disco, Disco!
Posts: 21,825
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by TelBoy
But they won't, Paul, so why your concern?
I was listening to a debate on smoking on R5 live this morning and was interested. suprised by the amount - £9bn generated!
I recon that we will all have to stump up the cash in one form or another.
Last edited by The Zohan; 31 May 2005 at 10:56 AM.
#9
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 12,304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Paul Habgood
I was listening to a debate on smoking on R5 live this morning and was interested.
I recon that we will all have to stump up the cash in one form or another.
I recon that we will all have to stump up the cash in one form or another.
#10
Scooby Regular
I actually thought the margin was alot lower. I thought it was like £7bn in and £5bn out in NHS costs. Bit shocking if its as much as £7bn.
Can only assume everything else will go up in order to compensate.
Legalise canabis - I watched a program ages ago which ran a marketing exercise on chocolate containing cannabis. Once they added the estimated government taxes I think you got 5 small chocs for £75 !
Can only assume everything else will go up in order to compensate.
Legalise canabis - I watched a program ages ago which ran a marketing exercise on chocolate containing cannabis. Once they added the estimated government taxes I think you got 5 small chocs for £75 !
#11
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Lincolnshire
Posts: 15,623
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Paul Habgood
Perhaps if i had typed a bit slower you would have been able to understand my original post
#12
Bulk buy on cannabis befor they legalise it then. Can just see the scoobynet thread - what sells well on ebay A: cannabis.
This government can't afford the shortfall that would occur if people stopped smoking as they already spend a lot more than we give them anyway.
This government can't afford the shortfall that would occur if people stopped smoking as they already spend a lot more than we give them anyway.
#13
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Here!
Posts: 5,145
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If smokers only generate 1bn of required care, who generates the rest? Non smokers? Old, very young, not medically necessary treatment seekers? The smokers aren't such a big dent. And just because they smoke doesn't mean the treatment they required was because of smoking *shrug*. Just easy to blame those of a minority again?
#14
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: A powerslide near you
Posts: 10,261
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Does the £1.9bn per year saving assume no smoking related effects on the NHS? The point being that if Joe Bloggs with Lung cancer gave up smoking today, he would still cost the NHS money as he still has the disease that requires treatment. The point being, even if everyone stopped smoking today, it would still be costing the NHS money for years to come. Ultimately it comes down to money or the nations health. Governments will take the money every day of the week.
#15
you put your finger on it paul and the £figures explain why tabs are the only inherently dangerous product that are allowed to be sold. political doublethink. you could say the same of booze.
#17
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Hampshire / Val d'Isere / Verbier
Posts: 409
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Paul Habgood
I was listening to a debate on smoking on R5 live this morning and was interested. suprised by the amount - £9bn generated!
I recon that we will all have to stump up the cash in one form or another.
I recon that we will all have to stump up the cash in one form or another.
this year the age limit is 16, next 17 and so on
That way no new entrants into the habit and the current ones pay until they all die
Of course strict enforcement of the age limt will be required - smokers are a dying breed!
#18
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Here!
Posts: 5,145
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Kids who start smoking now and before didn't necessarily wait til they were 16. You are right though, it is a dying breed. It's certainly not a cool thing anymore like it used to be.
I agree with the alcahol quote though, this should also be tackled as they too cause a large dent in the nhs purse What next then? Probibition?
I agree with the alcahol quote though, this should also be tackled as they too cause a large dent in the nhs purse What next then? Probibition?
#19
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Notts, UK
Posts: 4,935
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
We had a speaker on this subject when I was going through my cardiac rehabilitation program.
It's very hard for the NHS to put a hard figure on how much smoking costs as there are some conditions like heart disease which may have been caused by smoking and may in some people be genetic.
The NHS figure also doesn't cover the cost of looking after the patient long term. A heart disease patient may have to give up work in their 40's and live off the state for the rest of their lives. This type of cost is not included in the NHS figure but costs the tax payer £Billions.
Most smoking related conditions cause a burden to the NHS but cause a far higher burden on local authorities and the welfare system.
Most people who are experts in this field and are not tied to either side of the argument believe the cost is very even.
IMO the answer is simple, as smoking declines the Government should increase the tax on tabaco even further to offset the loss in tax revenue. This way even more people would be saved from the effects of smoking.
Cheers
Lee
It's very hard for the NHS to put a hard figure on how much smoking costs as there are some conditions like heart disease which may have been caused by smoking and may in some people be genetic.
The NHS figure also doesn't cover the cost of looking after the patient long term. A heart disease patient may have to give up work in their 40's and live off the state for the rest of their lives. This type of cost is not included in the NHS figure but costs the tax payer £Billions.
Most smoking related conditions cause a burden to the NHS but cause a far higher burden on local authorities and the welfare system.
Most people who are experts in this field and are not tied to either side of the argument believe the cost is very even.
IMO the answer is simple, as smoking declines the Government should increase the tax on tabaco even further to offset the loss in tax revenue. This way even more people would be saved from the effects of smoking.
Cheers
Lee
#20
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Here!
Posts: 5,145
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think the unemployed lazy buggers cost the UK more than smokers along with the phoney disabled claiming disability etc etc
In our workplace, the biggest sick offenders don't smoke at all.
In our workplace, the biggest sick offenders don't smoke at all.
#21
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: The biosphere
Posts: 7,824
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The government doesn't want you to stop smoking, that's why. They want you to carry on smoking so they can tax you for it and make a huge profit that they can squander on rubbish. The beauty is that afterwards they can turn round and blame smokers for the underfunded state of the NHS!
Same with "congestion charge".... they don't want people to stop driving they want you to drive AND pay.
Same with "congestion charge".... they don't want people to stop driving they want you to drive AND pay.
#22
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Here!
Posts: 5,145
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I quite agree ajm After all, unprotected sex and it's consequences (ie disease/pregnancy etc) costs the nhs quite a significant sum to treat but I doub't they will ban sex
I know, that was a silly thought
I know, that was a silly thought
#23
I doubt that, even with a ban on smoking in pubs etc, masses of people will simultaneously give up smoking. Smoking is gradually declining, so the revenue from smokers will gradually decline as well. I imagine the decline will be easy to recoup, especially as car ownership is increasing.
Although the cost to the NHS will decline, it will take many years before the reduction is apparent, as has already been mentioned.
It would be interesting to know, at the point in the future when smoking has become rare, how many people still get what are traditionally thought of as smoking related illnesses.
Although the cost to the NHS will decline, it will take many years before the reduction is apparent, as has already been mentioned.
It would be interesting to know, at the point in the future when smoking has become rare, how many people still get what are traditionally thought of as smoking related illnesses.
#24
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Location: Location.
Posts: 3,439
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Soulgirl
Kids who start smoking now and before didn't necessarily wait til they were 16. You are right though, it is a dying breed. It's certainly not a cool thing anymore like it used to be.
Must be what they do to relax after sex
#25
Originally Posted by Alas
Last figures I saw showed that young girl smokers under 16 is at its highest level by %age of population ever.
Must be what they do to relax after sex
Must be what they do to relax after sex
The main reason the number of smokers is dropping overall is, despite the fact that the number of female smokers is increasing, more male smokers are giving up than females are taking it up. IIRC it is because young girls have the mistaken belief that smoking keeps you slim.
So, could the media, with it's obsession with skinny female models, be held partially responsible for smoking related deaths?
There is also evidence that men are becoming more obsessed with their weight - the cases of eating related disorders in men is increasing. Hopefully young boys will not succumb to the smoking keeps you slim myth, or the number of smokers may well start increasing again.
#26
Originally Posted by Holy Ghost
you put your finger on it paul and the £figures explain why tabs are the only inherently dangerous product that are allowed to be sold. political doublethink. you could say the same of booze.
Ban smoking, save 10,000's but where can we plug the £7 billion gap....
#27
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Notts, UK
Posts: 4,935
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Buckrogers
Ban smoking, save 10,000's but where can we plug the £7 billion gap....
We are only looking at the cost to the NHS not the cost of smoking to the tax payer.
Most smoking related conditions are long term conditions not sudden death. Someone who suffers Heart Disease in their 40's may well end up on incapacity benefit, disability living allowance as well as rebated council tax and perhaps a rent paid property. They may well need this support for the next 20-30years.
This cost to the tax payer is not included in the NHS figure.
Experts believe the true cost of smoking related illness to the tax payer is pretty even with the tax revenue generated from tabaco sales.
Cheers
Lee
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
12
18 November 2015 07:03 AM